Jurnal Kearsipan Volume 20 Issue 2 Year 2025
E-ISSN: 2657-1706 / P-ISSN:1978-130X
jurnalkearsipan@anri.
| 126
Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014-2023 Analisis Sitasi Jurnal Archivaria: Tinjauan 2014-2023 Dwi Ridho Aulianto1.
Muhammad Aulia Taufiqi2.
Ika Lutfi Aulianti3.
Wulan Suci Intan Auliani3 Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional1.
Institut Pesantren Babakan Cirebon2.
Universitas PGRI Semarang3.
Universitas Diponegoro4 Gedung B.
Habibie.
Jl.
Thamrin No.
Jakarta Pusat 103401 Jl.
KH.
Masduqi Ali Blok Kasab.
Babakan.
Ciwaringin.
Cirebon.
Jawa Barat 451672 Jl.
Sidodadi Timur Jalan Dokter Cipto 24.
Karangtempel.
Semarang Tim.
Semarang.
Jawa Tengah 502323 Jl.
Prof.
Soedarto No.
Tembalang.
Kec.
Tembalang.
Kota Semarang.
Jawa Tengah 502754 dwir007@brin.
id1, auliataufiqi@ipeba.
id2, ika.
aulianti@upgris.
id3, ws.
a@gmail.
Abstrak Penelitian di bidang kearsipan semakin penting dalam era digital saat ini.
Archivaria, sebuah publikasi ilmiah terkemuka, memberikan kontribusi signifikan pada disiplin kearsipan melalui publikasi karya ilmiah berkualitas tinggi.
Salah satu indikator kualitas jurnal seperti ini adalah jumlah sitasi yang diterima, yang mencerminkan dampak dan kegunaan karya yang dipublikasikan.
Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis sitasi Jurnal Archivaria selama periode 2014-2023 untuk menilai dampak ilmiahnya.
Metode analisis bibliometrik digunakan, dengan mengumpulkan data dari basis data Scopus.
Data diproses, dianalisis, dan divisualisasikan menggunakan aplikasi Publish or Perish (PoP).
Analisis menemukan bahwa Jurnal Archivaria menerbitkan 128 artikel selama periode 2014-2023, menerima total 618 sitasi, dengan rata-rata 4,83 sitasi per artikel.
Jurnal ini mencapai indeks-h 12, indeks-g 20, indeks-hI-norm 10, dan indeks-hA 3.
Selain itu.
Archivaria menduduki peringkat 168 dari 280 jurnal dalam kategori "Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi" di Scopus, dengan CiteScore 0,8.
Jurnal Archivaria telah menunjukkan dampak sitasi yang moderat dalam bidang kearsipan.
Metrik ini memberikan wawasan tentang kontribusi ilmiahnya dan menyoroti perannya dalam kategori AuIlmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi.
Ay Kata Kunci: archivaria, jurnal kearsipan, bibliometrik, analisis sitasi Abstract Research in the field of archiving has become increasingly important in the current digital era.
Archivaria, a reputable scholarly publication, contributes significantly to the archiving discipline through the publication of high-quality scientific works.
One indicator of the quality of such a journal is the number of citations it receives, reflecting the impact and usefulness of the published works.
This study aims to analyze the citations of the Archivaria Journal during the 2014-2023 period to assess its scholarly impact.
bibliometric analysis method was employed, collecting data from the Scopus database.
The data was processed, analyzed, and visualized using the Publish or Perish (PoP) application.
The analysis found that the Archivaria Journal published 128 articles over the 2014-2023 period, receiving a total of 618 citations, 83 citations per article.
The journal attained an h-index of 12, a g-index of 20, an hI-norm of 10, and an hA-index of 3.
Furthermore.
Archivaria ranks 168 out of 280 journals in the "Library and Information Science" category on Scopus, with a CiteScore of 0.
The Archivaria Journal has demonstrated https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 moderate citation impact within the archiving field.
These metrics provide insights into its scholarly contribution and highlight its role within the "Library and Information Science" category.
Keywords: archivaria, archival journal, bibliometrics, citation analysis INTRODUCTION The publications in archival journals published by knowledge can be traced and evaluated institutions or international associations.
One through bibliometric analysis, a discipline of the reputable international journals focused that objectively examines the patterns of use on archival science is Archivaria, published and dissemination of scientific information.
by the Association of Canadian Archivists Bibliometric methods are valuable for (Millar, 2.
Archivaria serves as an mapping the intellectual structure of a essential platform for disseminating research research field (Zupic & Cater, 2.
Citation and contemporary thinking in archival analysis, one of the bibliometric methods, practices and theory, aiming to advance provides insight into the trends, structure, and dynamics of a field.
This analysis can publishes articles covering various archival determine the number of citations a scientific work receives, reflecting its contribution and preservation, acquisition, description, and impact within the research community Archivaria is indexed in prominent (Garfield, databases and indexing services such as scientific journals can assess a journal's Library and Information Science Abstracts quality, visibility, and influence using (LISA).
Scopus, and Web of Science.
Since indicators such as total citation count, impact its establishment in 1975.
Archivaria has factor, citation index, and citation network become one of the world's most prestigious analysis (Belter, 2.
This approach helps archival journals.
It is indexed in Scopus identify leading journals in specific fields and under the "Social Science" subject area in the "Library and Information Sciences" category, with a Quartile-3 (Q.
ranking, indicating its Citation strategies (Van Eck & Waltman, 2.
The significant status and influence in this field.
Archival science is essential for The journal enforces a rigorous peer-review organizational sustainability.
Developments process to maintain content quality and https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
| 127
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 provides open access to most articles on its measures the linkage between scientific and official website.
Furthermore.
Archivaria plays an essential role in supporting and citations, identifies interaction communities, promoting archival research and professional and tracks their evolution.
This framework provides insights into the consolidation and accessible articles and discussions, which can rapid changes in scientific and technological knowledge, especially in rapidly advancing https://archivaria.
ca/index.
php/archivaria.
fields like genetic engineering.
The insights The Q1.
Q2.
Q3, and Q4 rankings gained are invaluable for academics and indicate the influence of a Scopus-indexed practitioners in anticipating future trends and journal within a specific scientific field (Aulianto.
Archivaria biannually, aiming to be a communication HuwangAos study .
uses the Web of forum for archivists and archive users.
The Science to analyze trends in Academia journal also serves as a medium for SinicaAos research output, revealing patterns translating and disseminating critical archival such as saturation in publication counts, an articles in non-English languages, such as increase in citations, journal diversification.
German.
French, and Dutch, to the English- shifts in research focus, and evolving speaking community.
Archivaria covers Specific findings related to central issues in archival science, including the Institute of Physics and comparisons with appraisal, preservation, and accessibility, other research institutes are also explored.
adopting interdisciplinary approaches such as Then.
Aulianto.
Yusup & Setianti .
analyzed citations in Jurnal Kajian Informasi & anthropology, art history, geography, and Perpustakaan (JKIP).
The study found that communication and media studies.
JKIP, published biannually, released 111 Research on citation analysis in articles between 2013 and 2019, with scientific journals has long been of interest to collaborative articles .
2%) outnumbering researchers in Indonesia.
One study by Chen, single-author articles .
8%).
JKIP issues Mao, and Li .
present a framework that averaged over 101 pages per issue, with a https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 total of 190 citations, and the most cited .
analyzed Jurnal Pendidikan article received nine citations.
Visualization Geografi (JPG) for 2019-2021, noting 40 can highlight collaboration frequency and articles with nine citations.
JPGAos annual average citations were three, with an average .
23 citations per article.
The average Archival Science during 2012-2021 using authors per article were 2.
Although JPG bibliometric analysis on Scopus data.
The has published numerous articles, the analysis study found that Archival Science published showed a need for quality improvements to 208 documents, including articles, editorials, boost citations.
Journal managers should errata, notes, and reviews, and was cited in design development plans to increase JPG's various document types, totaling 1,985 contribution to the field.
Additionally.
Aulianto citations, with 1,227 sourced from Scopus- Based on this background, this study indexed documents.
The average citations per aims to analyze citation patterns in Archivaria article were 198.
5, with an h-index of 23, g- based on publication year, authorsAo country of index of 33, hI,norm of 18, hla of 1.
8, and hA- origin, productive authors, document types index of 6.
cited, and citation metrics, such as citation Furthermore.
Rahayu & Idhani .
count and Archivaria as a reference source.
conducted a citation analysis of Jurnal Ilmu This analysis is expected to provide a Perpustakaan.
Informasi, dan Kearsipan:
comprehensive view of citation trends and Khizanah Al Hikmah for 2013Ae2018, finding patterns in Archivaria, a leading journal in that the journal published 101 articles with a archival science.
The findings of this study total of 1,512 citations.
The most cited can enhance understanding of scholarly sources were books .
23%), followed by publishing practices in archival science and journals .
71%) and websites .
33%).
Domestic sources were more frequently cited Archivaria, .
than international ones .
publishing strategies.
The most cited recent sources were published between 2011-2015, totaling 145
METODE
books, journals, papers, and proceedings.
This study employs bibliometric along with 110 websites.
Lastly.
Masruroh et methods to analyze archival research trends https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
| 129
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 in Archivaria journal from 2013 to 2023.
The emphasize that bibliometrics helps identify selection of the 2014Ae2023 publication period emerging scientific trends, popular research was based on the timing of the data collection topics, and the influence of globalization on carried out in 2024.
The ten-year range is scientific productivity.
Mou et al.
add commonly used in bibliometric studies to that bibliometrics has become essential in capture longitudinal trends while maintaining management and academia, driving the relevancy to current research developments.
development of specialized analysis software.
This period also reflects a significant shift in Dhillon archival scholarship, marked by increased bibliometrics not only measures scientific productivity but also organizes information initiatives, and methodological evolution in for easy retrieval and use.
One of its archival research.
The selection of a ten-year techniques, citation analysis, assesses the publication window aligns with established impact and influence of scientific works bibliometric practices, where five-to-ten-year through citation patterns across publications, ranges are commonly used to observe revealing the knowledge structure, research trends, and impact of articles or authors within a field through indicators like impact developments (Merigy & Yang, 2017.
Zupic factor, h-index, and cocitation analysis (Aria & Uater, 2.
& Cuccurullo, 2017.
Ellegaard & Wallin.
Bibliometrics, a quantitative analysis Gill of scientific publications, was chosen for its Data for Archivaria was collected ability to provide an overview of a research from Scopus and accessed on July 27, 2024.
field that can be tracked through journals Information was sourced by searching with (Merigo & Yang, 2.
This approach uses mathematical and statistical methods to publications from 2014 to 2023.
The RIS- describe, evaluate, and predict advancements format data from Scopus was analyzed using in science and technology (Zhang.
Liu, & Liu, the Publish or Perish (PoP) application.
PoP Bibliometric analysis enables both accommodates multiple data sources, such as quantitative and qualitative explanations of Google Mokhnacheva and Tsvetkova .
Microsoft Academic.
Scopus, and Web of ISSN Scholar.
Crossref.
PubMed, https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 Science, and can also import data from other 2023 shows a fluctuating trend, with varying platforms (Aulianto.
Annisa, & Taufiqi.
A comprehensive PoP analysis can According to data recorded in the Scopus evaluate the quality of each author's articles database, a total of 128 documents were and the overall quality of the journal published during this period.
The number of (Aulianto.
Yusup, & Setianti, 2.
documents published annually varied, with Data visualization was processed and VOSviewer.
the lowest number in 2017 at six documents This and the highest in 2014 with 20 documents.
visualization includes detailed information The average publication rate per year was about publications in the research field, such 8 documents.
The fluctuation in the as author bibliographic pairs, countries, number of documents published may be institutions, journals, and co-occurrence of influenced by several factors, such as the author keywords (Orduya-Malea & Costas, volume of manuscripts received, the selection Oyewola & Dada, 2022.
Perianes- and editing process, and the journal's editorial Rodriguez et al.
, 2.
Nevertheless.
Archivaria generally maintained consistency in releasing RESULT AND DISCUSSION two issues per volume annually.
Information regarding the document distribution in Document Distribution The Archivaria from 2014 to 2023 is shown in Figure 1, which displays the number of published in Archivaria Journal from 2014 to documents published per year.
Doc
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Figure 1.
Archivaria Journal Publications from 2013 to 2023 https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
| 131
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 Document Types highlights that scientific articles are the most Archivaria Journal publishes five types of documents: articles, notes, reviews, dominant document type in Archivaria Journal.
editorials, and letters.
Each document type has distinct characteristics.
The "Article" type presenting research findings, theoretical studies, or critical analyses on specific topics.
These researchers, academics, or practitioners, undergo a peer review process prior to Figure 2.
Document Types "Note" refers to brief records or short information on a topic.
"Review" contains critical evaluations or assessments of books, articles, or other relevant works.
"Editorial" is a summary or editorial opinion on published articles or significant issues, usually written by the editorial board and featured at the beginning of the journal issue.
Meanwhile, "Letter" correspondence or reader feedback addressed to the journal editor, often containing input, critiques, or discussions on the journalAos Out of the total 128 published accounting for 115 documents .
8%).
The remainder comprises six notes .
7%), three reviews .
3%), two editorials .
6%), and .
6%).
This Document Distribution by Country and Author The analysis of document distribution by authors' countries reveals valuable insights into geographical contributions.
Canada stands out as the leading contributor with 70 publications, accounting for approximately 7% of the total.
The United States follows Australia contributed 9, the United Kingdom 4, and Italy 2.
Figure 3 visually represents this geographical distribution of contributions to Archivaria Journal.
Although Canada is the predominant source of contributions, the range of author origins illustrates the journal's international engagement, reflecting the global significance of the topics covered.
This https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 diversity enriches the perspectives within the across the globe, thereby enhancing the journal, underscoring one of Archivaria quality and depth of discussions in archival JournalAos strengths: a multidisciplinary forum that draws professionals and researchers from Canada United States Australia United Kingdom Italy Figure 3.
AuthorsAo Countries of Origin Through a detailed identification and Caswell.
Foscarini, and MacNeil each analysis of data, additional insights were contributed 3 articles, making up about 4.
per author.
Table 1 provides a comprehensive documents by author.
Notably, ten authors breakdown of the top 10 most productive authors, giving a clear perspective on the Archivaria, with Douglas and Dryden leading distribution of contributions within the as the most prolific, each with 5 publications.
Archivaria Journal.
This table allows readers accounting for approximately 7.
8% of total patterns of publication more effectively.
Following Alisauskas.
Table 1.
Top Ten Productive Authors Authors Countries Total Douglas.
Jennifer Canada Dryden.
Jean E.
Peru Alisauskas.
Alexandra Canada Caswell.
Michelle United States https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
| 133
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 Citation Authors Countries Total Foscarini.
Fiorella Canada MacNeil.
Heather Canada Byk.
Greg Canada Ballin.
Mya Australia Belovari.
Susanne United States Brilmyer.
Gracen Canada Metrics Archivaria Journal Citations in scholarly works play a contributions of previous research.
The scientific impact of a journal is assessed by dividing the number of citations by the number of articles published within a specific timeframe, typically over two years.
The more frequently a work is cited by other authors, the greater its utility and impact (Gunawan, 2.
Citation analysis measures how often a scholarly work is cited by others (Erwina & Sodikin, 2.
The quality of scientific work is reflected in various indicators, including the relevance of the research for program evaluation, the ability to map scientific progress across disciplines, the contribution to science and technology development, and the impact factor of the publishing journal (Ahmad el al, 2.
the quality, productivity, and impact of scholarly work in academia and research.
The citation metrics for Archivaria from 2014 to 2023 are shown in Table 2.
This citation analysis was performed using the Publish or Perish (PoP) application, with data sourced from the Scopus database based on ISSN and publication year.
The metrics include several key data points: publication years refers to the period under review, 2014Ae Citation years is the period established for counting citations, set at ten years from 2014 to 2023.
A total of 128 documents from Archivaria published during this period have been indexed in Scopus, with a total of 618 Cites/year represents the average annual citation rate for Archivaria, calculated 80 by dividing the total citations by 10 .
ublication year.
Cites/paper indicates the average citation per article/document in Archivaria, which is 4.
83, while author/paper Citation analysis is a key metric for assessing https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 represents the average number of authors per produced by an author and the number of article/document, standing at 1.
citations received from other authors or Citation analysis serves as a vital tool (Aulianto Nashihuddin, in evaluating the quality, productivity, and A journal achieves an h-index when impact of scholarly work in academia and each published article receives at least h The h-index is an index used to The h-index reflects both the measure both the productivity and impact of quantity of publications and the number of published articles by authors.
This index is citations per publication.
based on the number of scholarly works Table 2.
Citation Metrics of Archivaria Journal Authors Countries Publication years Citation years Papers Citations Cites/year Cites/paper Cites/author Papers/author Authors/paper h-index g-index hI,norm hI,annual hA-index Paper with ACC>= 1,2,5,10,20: 28,10,2,1,0 10 .
https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
| 135
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 The cumulative number of citations from referenced articles affects other articles and can be used to calculate the g-index.
The g-index calculation represents the average total citations after articles are sorted in descending order up to the g position.
This metric considers the weight of citations each document receives, and for a particular author, the g-index is not limited by the total number of publications.
Both the h-index and g-index rank documents based on citation According to Harzing.
com, the hI,norm is an individual h-index obtained by normalizing the citations for each article, dividing the total citations by the number of authors, and then calculating the h-index from the normalized citation count.
The hI-annual .
is derived by dividing the hl-norm by the academic age .
he number of years since the first publicatio.
, while the hA-index is a new researcherAos impact, calculated as the average h-index.
Archivaria has an h-index of 12, a gindex of 20, an hI-norm of 10, an hI-annual of 00, and an hA-index of 3.
The high citation count for Archivaria indicates that its published articles serve as references for other authors, supporting a trend of research aligned with the existing publications in Archivaria.
Citation Counts of Articles The impact of a journal or article is often gauged by its citation count, as frequently cited articles typically indicate broader usage and reference by other authors.
A higher citation count reflects greater academic and scientific influence, suggesting that more researchers are relying on these articles as foundational references in their own work (Aulianto, 2.
Table 3 presents the top ten most-cited articles in Archivaria Journal from 2014 to 2023, showcasing citation counts accumulated from articles published between 2013 and 2022, with citations recorded through 2024.
As shown in Table 3, the article with the highest citation count, at 142 citations, was authored by M.
Caswell and M.
Cifor and published in 2016.
This article stands out as a significant reference in the field, highlighting its enduring influence.
Following this, an article by J.
Ghaddar ranks second with 42 citations, while a 2014 article by A.
Acker and J.
Brubaker holds third place with 33 The fourth- through tenth-ranked articles have citation counts ranging between 14 and 21.
These citation figures illustrate the https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 articles within the academic community but Archivaria, with contributions that span also signifies the journal's role as a key multiple years and address evolving issues in resource in advancing archival research and archival science.
This high citation frequency not only underscores the importance of these Table 3.
Top Ten Most Cited Articles Authors Title Year Cites/ Year Cites Caswell.
From human rights to feminist ethics: Radical Cifor empathy in the archives Ghaddar The spectre in the archive: Truth, reconciliation.
The Reconfiguration of the Archive as data to be Mined Toward a AuThird orderAy archival interface:
and indigenous archival memory Acker.
Death, memorialization, and social media: A Brubaker platform perspective for personal archives Pell Radicalizing the politics of the archive: An ethnographic reading of an activist archive Moss.
Thomas.
Gollins Lemieux Research notes on some theoretical and practical implications of visual explorations in the Canadian context of financial electronic records Carbone Artists in the archive: An exploratory study of the artist-in-residence program at the city of portland archives & records center Niu Linked data for archives Douglas.
AuTreat Them with the Reverence of ArchivistsAy Alisauskas.
Records Work.
Grief Work, and Relationship Mordell Work in the Archives Nathan.
Stewarding collections of trauma responsibility, and questions of action Shaffer.
Castor https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
| 137
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 Archivaria CiteScore in Archivaria Journal Citation analysis is an essential tool for assessing the quality, productivity, and impact of scholarly works in academia and Indicators such as Impact Factor (IF).
CiteScore, and h-index are used to evaluate academic performance and the impact of scientific publications.
The Impact Factor, calculated by Thomson Reuters, serves as a reference indicator of high citation indexes for reputable international journals.
However, in Scopus, the reputational level of a journal can be assessed using the CiteScore.
The higher the CiteScore, the more reputable the journal is considered.
CiteScore is a journal-level metric published by Scopus that Journal CiteScore of 0.
8, calculated on May 5, 2024, and ranks 168th out of 280 journals in the AuLibrary and Information ScienceAy category.
The most recent CiteScore trends and rankings for 2023 in the Scopus database list the top journal as the International Journal of Information Management with a score of 1, followed by the European Journal of Information Systems with a score of 23.
The International Journal of Information Management Data Insights holds third place with a score of 19.
Information Processing and Management ranks fourth with a score of 0, and Government Information Quarterly is fifth with a score of 15.
measures the average number of citations received per document published in the In Predicting the Citation Count and CiteScore of Journals One Year in Advance.
Croft Sack importance of forecasting these indicators.
Figure 4.
CiteScore of Archivaria Journal explaining predictive tasks that estimate future citations and CiteScore to project a journalAos performance and influence.
Using neural networks.
Croft gathered historical data through Scopus APIs, compiling citation and CiteScore data, among other metrics, to improve citation prediction and assessment.
Archivaria as a Reference Source The significance of a journal can be assessed by examining its presence within the Citations in academic work not only offer supplemental information related https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 to the topic under study but also serve to writing highlights its role as an authoritative resource, contributing to the quality and attribution to original sources, and honor the scholarly value of research across the field of contributions of previous authors.
Such archival science.
Furthermore, the frequency references are vital, as they enhance the with which a journal is cited can serve as an indicator of its utilization and influence providing a foundation that supports the within the scientific community (Aulianto, academic rigor and integrity of the work.
The frequent citation of Archivaria in scholarly Docs 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Figure 5.
Documents Citing Archivaria .
As of July 30, 2024.
Archivaria has highlights Archivaria's rising influence and been cited in 618 documents according to relevance within the academic community, data from the Scopus database, reflecting its underlining its role as a crucial reference extensive utilization by scholars in their source for ongoing research.
The upward year-by-year Archivaria's Archivaria citations shows a clear upward expanding impact, as more researchers draw Starting with only 2 citations in 2014, on its contributions to support and inform the number grew consistently, reaching 5 in their own scholarly work, underscoring its 2015, 25 in 2016, 28 in 2017, 43 in 2018, 51 value as a reputable and authoritative in 2019, 63 in 2020, 91 in 2021, 122 in 2022, resource in archival science.
and 111 in 2023.
This steady increase https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
| 139
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023 chapters, conference papers, reviews, books, editorials, and notes.
This indicates that Archivaria is a popular and frequently cited source of information within the scholarly The quality of a work can be assessed by the impact it generates, one measure of Figure 6.
Types of Documents Citing which is the number of citations it receives.
Archivaria The more frequently a work is cited, the more Published journal articles are used as its information is utilized by others.
Table 4 references or additional information sources shows that the most common sources citing by various parties according to their Archivaria are scholarly journal articles.
The respective needs.
Data analysis from Scopus top five scholarly journals that frequently cite shows that Archivaria is utilized as a Archivaria are listed in Table 4.
reference not only for article writing but also for other document types, including book Table 4.
List of Journals Citing Archivaria Reference Source Cites Archival Science Archivaria Journal of Documentation Archives and Records Records Management Journal The scope of reference sources used Archivaria.
Journal encompasses the fields of archival science Archives and documentation.
Archival Science is the Management Journal.
Records.
Documentation.
Records most frequently cited journal, with 54 In addition to Archival Science, other commonly cited sources include https://doi.
org/ 10.
46836/jk.
Copyright A 2025 Author.
Published by Direktorat Sistem Kearsipan.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
0 International License.
Aulianto et al.
Ae Citation Analysis of the Archivaria Journal: A Review of 2014Ae2023
CONLUSION
influence within specific archival research This study analyzed the citation performance of Archivaria based on Scopus- These indexed publications during 2014Ae2023 using Archivaria remains an important reference bibliometric indicators.
The findings show source in archival scholarship, particularly in that Archivaria published 128 documents emerging topics such as digital archiving, across various types, including articles, archival ethics, memory studies, and socio- reviews, editorials, notes, and letters.
The citation analysis indicates that Archivaria has Although its quantitative visibility remains received 618 citations, with an average of moderate in global bibliometric metrics, its 83 citations per article and an h-index of 12.
qualitative influence and thematic relevance While the journal's CiteScore .
and Scopus ranking .
out of 280 journals in the Archivaria as a valuable venue for advancing Library and Information Science categor.
archival discourse.
place it in the moderate category, the steady scholarly attention.
The RECOMMENDATION Future studies may expand the analysis to earlier publication periods or compare Archivaria with other archival journal ranking and increasing citation trends journals to explore broader shifts in archival suggests that Archivaria plays a significant scholarship and global citation patterns.
role as a subject-specialized journal that Overall, the findings reaffirm the journalAos contributes deeply to archival theory and enduring contribution to the evolution of practice rather than competing broadly across archival science and highlight the ongoing importance of bibliometric assessment in Citation patterns also highlight the understanding scholarly impact.
dominance of Canadian contributions and the recurring presence of key authors, indicating REFERENCES