Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake
Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business
September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 409–441

THE IMPLEMENTATION
OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
(CSR) IN CENTRAL JAVA EARTHQUAKE
A Preliminary Study on Consumer Belief, Attitude, and
Purchase Intention
Kresno Agus Hendarto
Forestry Research Institute of Mataram
Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia

In Indonesia, Law No. 40/2007 paragraph 74 on Limited
Liability Corporation regulates corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Although CSR is mandatory for Indonesian resource-based firms,
only four months after its enactment, six parties have asked for a
judicial review to the Constitution Court as to the mandatory
implementation of CSR. They argue that the mandatory implementation of CSR might result in legal uncertainty, render businesses
inefficient, decrease competitiveness, and trigger discriminative
treatments. Using the cases of CSR after the earthquake in Yogyakarta,
this paper aims at answering the question of whether the implementation of CSR will lead to a decrease in competitiveness. Harnessing
a mixed method of qualitative and quantitative approaches, this
paper examines the models of beliefs, attitudes, and purchase
intentions of consumers toward a company implementing CSR. The
first phase of this study used a focus group discussion (FGD) to
collect data from those who had benefited from CSR, and was
analyzed using the content analysis. The results of the first phase
then became the basis for the second phase. In the second phase, data
were collected by surveying parents of school children whose school
buildings were reconstructed by CSR programs, and answers were

409

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

analyzed using the partial least squares analysis. Results show that
the conjecture that the implementation of CSR will result in a
decrease in competitiveness is not true. It is evident that CSR
program affects the attitudes of consumers toward the firm, and that
attitude fully mediates the relation between beliefs and purchase
intentions toward the products of the firm implementing CSR.
Keywords: attitude; belief; corporate social responsibility; Law No. 40/2007;
purchase intention; Yogyakarta earthquake

Introduction
In Indonesia, Law No. 40/2007
paragraph 74 on Limited Liability
Corporation regulates the corporate
social responsibility (CSR). This law
has undergone a long process since its
proposal in the form of government
draft on October 12, 2005 until its
passage on July 20, 2007. Although
CSR is mandatory for Indonesian resource-based firms, four months after
the enactment, six parties (Chamber of
Commerce and Industry, Young Indonesian Entrepreneurs Association,
Women Indonesian Entrepreneurs
Association, Lili Panma Ltd., Apac
Centra Centertex Ltd., and Kreasi Tiga
Pilar Ltd.) asked for a judicial review
to the Constitution Court about the
mandatory implementation of CSR.
They argued that paragraph 74 of the
Law of Limited Liability Corporate
was contradictory to paragraphs 28D
Article 1, 28I Article 2, and 33 Article
4 of Constitution 1945, in the phrase of
“justified efficiency.” Furthermore, the
mandatory implementation of CSR
might result in legal uncertainty and
cause inefficient businesses, decrease
410

competitiveness, and trigger discriminative treatments. However, on April
16, 2009, the Constitution Court declined the request for judicial review.
Using the cases of CSR during the
earthquake in Jogjakarta, which was
before the enactment of the Law, the
objective of this paper is to investigate
whether CSR leads to a decrease in
competitiveness. In this paper, the objective is achieved by examining the
models of beliefs, attitudes, and purchase intentions of consumers toward
a company implementing CSR.
On May 27, 2006, at approximately 05:59 a.m., an earthquake of
5.6 Richter scale damaged Yogyakarta
and the surrounding areas. The results
of the preliminary assessment on the
damages and losses of an early morning earthquake in the provinces of DIY
and Central Java revealed that the earthquake killed more than 5,716 people,
injured 37,927 people, destroyed
240,396 houses, as well as resulted in
disruption of local economic activities. The damage and loss assessment
performed in the early of June 2006
indicated that there had been damages
and losses of Rp29.1 trillion (US$3.1

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

million). The earthquake was one of
the worst disasters in Indonesia and
the world for the last 10 years. Two
regencies, Kabupaten Bantul in
Yogyakarta and Kabupaten Klaten in
Central Java, were the two regions
suffering the worst. Two sectors that
suffered the most were housing (52%
of the total damage and loss values)
and production (31% of the total damage and loss values). Therefore, the
main strategy and policy of recovery
and rehabilitation are focused on three
program components: (1) housing and
settlement recovery, (2) public infrastructure recovery, and (3) public and
regional
economy
recovery
(BAPPENAS 2006). At that time, some
foreign countries, foreign and domestic firms have extended charity in the
program of CSR.
As mentioned above, the objective of this study is to test the models of
beliefs, attitudes, and purchase intentions of consumers toward the firms
and the products of the firms that implement CSR. Mixed methods are utilized in this study. The use of mixed
methods in case study research usually
contributes to increasing accuracy and
complexity/coverage in a study more
than generality (Woodside 2010).
Beurden and Gossling (2008),
Frederick (1994), and Griffin (2000)
inform that there has not been any
consensus as to what activities could
be categorized as CSR. Most firms in
Indonesia implement CSR in the form
of donation (Hendarto 2008). Abidin
et al. (2003) suggest that the habit of
firms to give donation is basically not

as popular as the habit of individuals
who are owners or hold the positions
executives to give donation. This sometimes makes it difficult to differentiate
whether the given donation is intentional and planned in firm policies or it
is because of the motivation of the
individuals holding the positions of
owners or executives. Hence, to answer the research questions, it is necessary that mixed methods be used.
Bryman (1988) suggests three main
approaches to the mixed methods: (1)
qualitative method which facilitates
quantitative method, (2) quantitative
method which facilitates qualitative
method, and (3) qualitative and quantitative methods that share an equal
emphasis. In accordance with
Bryman’s (1988) suggestion, this study
finds it necessary to use a mixed method
in which qualitative method (phase 1)
facilitates quantitative method (phase
2). In the phase 1 of this study, data are
collected using Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and analyzed using the
content analysis (qualitative). The results are then used to develop the items
of questions and develop hypotheses
for phase 2.

Literature Review
Pro-social and Attribution
Theory
To identify the motivation of altruism, whether it is selfless or selfish,
to a particular extent is difficult since
most human beings misjudge why
people have such behavior (Mashoedi
411

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

2009). Altruism is an attitude of helping without any pretentive motivation
for own profits or benefits. Sears et al.
(1985) define altruism as a voluntary
action performed by an individual or a
group to help other people without any
expectation of rewards (except the feeling of having done goodness).
Faturochman (2006) argues that such
a condition is difficult to be found in
the real world. Even if it exists, the
possibility and frequency will be very
low. Most people want to earn benefits
for their own, even if the amount is
small and immaterial. Therefore, when
talking about helping others, pro-social attitude is more appropriate than
altruism. Baron and Byrne (2003) studied the steps of giving help. There are
five stages that an individual goes
through before making a decision to
give help: (1) realizing the existence of
emergency condition since people will
not give any help unless there is nobody who needs help; (2) interpreting
a condition as the emergency condition; (3) assuming that the condition is
personal responsibility or the responsibility of observer; (4) knowing what
has to be done (for instance, we can
help someone drowning only when we
know how to swim and how to pull the
drowning person out); and (5) making
a decision to help.
However, someone who gets help
gives either negative or positive responses. Baron and Byrne (2003) show
that some studies find that a negative
response may result from the feeling
that the help decreases self-esteem,
and that he or she (the helpee) lacks
412

competency (see also DePaulo et al.
1981; Fisher et al. 1982). On the other
hand, when a person feels that the help
he or she gets is sincere, there will be
an ego support (Sears et al. 1985). In
the same study, it is shown that previous research (Fisher et al. 1982; Tessler
and Schwartz 1972) concludes that
people tend to ask for help when they
can relate the problem to a difficult
condition and not because of incompetency. It is also concluded that the help
is more easily accepted when the person in need does not have to explicitly
request for it.
Roediger et al. (1984) and Hervey
et al. (1976) reveal that the attribution
theory was initially introduced by Fritz
Heider in 1958. Heider assumes that in
principal everybody is a naive scientist, meaning that when faced with a
difficult situation or event, he or she
tends to analyze the causalities although his or her knowledge of the
event is inadequate. Sears et al. (1985)
writes that according to Heider, everybody, and not only the psychologists,
seeks an explanation for other people’s
behavior. He names it naive psychology, which is a general theory about
human behavior adopted by a lay person. The basic assumption of the theory
is that humans as social beings always
make attributes to evaluate other people
and events related with interpersonal
matters. Shaw and Custanzo (1982)
say that attribution process is the process in which a person undergoes an
event related with his or her interests,
thoughts, and comprehension and understanding. The event or something

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

being the attribution object can be
other people’s actions, or his or her
own actions, or impacts resulting from
the event.

Value-Expectancy and
Hierarchy of Effect Models
The relationships among thought,
feeling, and action have become the
subject of study since Aristotle,
Descrates, and Plato (Copley 1988).
Every researcher proposes different
models to elaborate on why people
behave in a particular way and what
they will do. One of the dominant
models is Fishbein and Ajzen’s model.
Fishbein and Ajzen (1980) propose a
“value expectancy model” of attitude
formation, postulating that the sum of
strength of our beliefs and their concurrent and affective evaluations of
the beliefs combine to determine the
attitude toward performance of an action. The attitude then influences our
intention to perform the act, and the
intention has a direct influence on our
behavior. This model has three steps.
First, the model begins from predicting one’s behavior from the intention.
When an employee of tax office says
that he or she has a purely dedicative
and “clean” intention to work, he or
she is more likely to do it than the
situation where the employee does not
have such an intention. Second, intention can be predicted by two main
variables of attitude toward behavior:
(1) does the employee think that becoming a “clean” employee is good
and expected? and (2) what are other
people’s (for instances, superiors, reli-

gious leaders, or relatives) perceptions
on what should be done? Third, the
attitude toward behavior is predicted
by value-expectancy theory. In Sears
et al. (1985), this theory suggests that
decision is made on the basis of: (1) the
value of possibly made decisions and
(2) the degree of expectation about the
results of the decision. This theory is
frequently harnessed to examine persuasion. Persuasion is defined as an
explicit attempt to influence belief,
attitude, and behavior (Mowen and
Minor 2001). Peter and Olson (1996)
suggest that persuasion is the changes
in belief, attitude, and behavior resulting from marketing communications.
The concepts of belief, attitude,
and behavior are closely related to the
general knowledge of consumer attitude formation, which is usually used
to define the study of relations among
belief, attitude, and behavior (Mowen
and Minor 2001). The hierarchy of
effect model (HOE) was popularized
in 1961 by Lavidge and Steiner although according to Barry (1987), this
theory had existed since the beginning
of the 20th century. Barry (1987) informs that the history of HOE model
development can be classified into
three phases: (1) early development,
which started from the latest years
before the 20th century to 1960s; (2)
modern development, which began in
1960s until mid-1970s; and (3) challenges and defenses, which started from
mid-1970s to present time and is characterized by the development of involvement concept.

413

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

This model suggests that
someone’s behavior, since receiving
marketing communications until making a purchase decision and consuming a product, undergoes a series of
processes or phases. Shimp (2000)
provides evidence that in order for
marketing information to be successful, it has to move consumers from one
goal to another, just like stepping up
the staircases toward the top. Barry
(1987) says that there are some models
of HOE that have been formulated. All
of them are based on the idea that
marketing communications move
people from the phase in which people
are not aware of a particular brand to
the phase where they finally buy the
brand.

Phase I
In line with the purposes of the
study, the research objective for phase
1 is to understand whether the donated
fund given during the recovery after
earthquake is a part of CSR. This is
performed by identifying the motivation of the firm in implementing CSR
through the participants of FGD. The
sub-questions in the phase 1 are: (1)
the knowledge and perception of CSR
program recipients of the firms; (2) the
evaluation made by CSR program recipients of the firms; and (3) the tendency of CSR program recipients to
behave in the firms. The results of subquestion analysis are then used to select (either add or reduce) question
items asked to the respondents in phase
2.
414

Method
At this phase, qualitative approach
is utilized. Data are collected using
Focus Group Discussion (FGD).
Malhotra (2004) reveals that FGD is
an interview made by a moderator in a
natural and unstructured way to a limited group of respondents. Some scholars support the use of FGD. According
to Churchill (2001), FGD in marketing
research is known to be productive
because: (1) it results in hypotheses
that can further be tested qualitatively,
(2) it results in information useful to
develop questionnaires, (3) it gives
basic information about product category, and (4) it secures impressions
about the concepts of new products.
Meanwhile, Steward and Shamdasani
(1990) write that FGD gives data closer
to the emic side of the continuum.
Furthermore, Krueger (1994) argues
that FGD is a procedure useful when
we want to identify people’s perceptions toward an experience, idea,
thought, or event. FGD is more natural
since the informant both influences
and is influenced by one another, just
like the real life setting.
Malhotra (2004) also suggests
some advantages of FGD: (1) synergy,
meaning that it unifies a group of people
to provide information, perspectives,
and ideas in a larger spectrum than
individual responses in a personal interview; (2) snowball effect, meaning
that the effect works in a group interview in which the answer of a participant will trigger a series of reactions
from other participants; (3) stimula-

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

tion, meaning that after the period of
introduction, respondents are willing
to express their ideas and feelings in
line with the feelings of the group
similar to the topic discussed; (4) security, meaning that participants’ feelings are similar to the feelings of other
members in the group such that they
feel comfortable and are thus willing
to express their feelings and ideas; (5)
spontaneity, meaning that since the
participants are not required to answer
questions specifically, their responses
may be spontaneous and unusual, and
therefore we have to obtain the appropriate ideas from their perspectives;
(6) coincidence, implying that it is
likely that unexpected ideas may be
expressed in a group interview than in
a personal interview; (7) structure,
meaning that FGD gives flexibility of
topic and depth of treatment; (8) speed,
meaning that because people are interviewed at the same time, the collection
and analysis of data may be relatively
fast.

Population and Sample
The population of this study is
those benefited by the CSR program.
Churchill (2001) reveals that the main
focus of exploratory research, such as
FGD, is to identify ideas and inputs.
Moreover, an exploratory study seldom uses detailed questionnaires or
probability sampling plans. Therefore,
the sampling technique used in this
study is judgmental/ purposive sampling. Judgmental sampling is a form
of convenience sampling whose elements are selected on the basis of judg-

ment of the researcher or based on
particular criteria. The criteria in this
study are: (1) they have directly benefited from a firm’s CSR program and
(2) they are willing to be involved in
the study.

Elaboration of Required Data
In FGD, the size of participants is
an important factor to be considered.
Dawson et al. in Irwanto (2006) suggest that the ideal number of participants is 7-11 persons. When it is too
small, there will be no interesting variation, but if it is too large it will reduce
the opportunity of each participant to
contribute in-depth thoughts and ideas.
Meanwhile, Malhotra (2004) and
Churchill (2001) suggest that the ideal
size is 8 to12 people. When the group
is too small, it may be easily dominated by one or two members, but
when it is too large, some members
may get frustrated and bored because
it will take much time for them to get
a turn to be involved. Krueger (1994)
argues that the optimal size is 7 to10
people whereas Stewart and
Shamdasani (1990) find that the optimal size of participants in FGD is 6
to12 people. According to Wicaksono
(2005), there are two models in FGD:
(1) partial model and (2) confrontative
model. In the partial model, the participants of FGD are people who have
similar ideas, thoughts, and interests.
It means that there is no confrontative
or contrast interests among the participants. The objective of this model is to
avoid severe conflicts of interest among
the participants, and shun the tendency
415

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

of blaming each other or reciprocal
defense, that may obscure or obstruct
the objective of the FGD. On the contrary, in the confrontative model, emotional character, idea, material mastery, cultural and social background
deserve careful attention in selecting
participants. In the confrontative
model, the facilitator plays the role of
a coach and referee when the discussion becomes ‘heated’ as the participants reciprocally blaming each other
in the discussion.
In line with the objective, the study
uses partial FGD. The sample (informants) involved in the FGD is presented in Appendix 1.

Data Analysis
The dialogue was recorded in an
audiovisual instrument. It was then
transcribed and analyzed using the
content analysis. Berelson (1952) finds
that in most cases validity does not
seem to be a major problem in the
content analysis. With careful operational definition and accurate and correct indicator selection, the coding
sheet is assumed to measure what it
should measure. Kassarjian (1977)
adds that in the content analysis it is
enough to use content validity or face
validity.
Malhotra (2004) suggests that one
of the weaknesses of FGD is misjudgment since FGD is prone to client and
researcher bias. To avoid this problem, reliability analysis is employed.
Reliability testing in this study is conducted using the method of inter-coder
416

reliability. This testing purports to
ensure the objectivity of the data to be
analyzed and the reliability of analysis
techniques in drawing conclusions
from the FGD. In this study, the reliability is examined using Holsti’s coefficient of reliability (1963).
R=

2(C1,2)
C1 + C2

where,
C 1,2 = the number of category assignments on which all coders agree
C1, C2 = the sum of all category assignments by all coders
After the validity and reliability
tests, the transcribed data were descriptively analyzed. Descriptive
analysis was performed by
contextualizing the transcribed data
while contextualization was conducted
by coding the consensus and differences among the informants, and presenting the statements of the informants involved in the FGD to
strengthen arguments.

Results
The development of coding sheet
had been consulted in advance with a
researcher at the Center for Cultural
and Popular Media Research. The objective of the consultation was to have
a validity test in the coding sheet. In
order to assess the face validity of the
coding sheet, I submitted the coding
sheet and a letter introducing my re-

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

search objectives to researchers at the
Center for Cultural and Popular Media
Research. These respondents then provided feedback and qualitative comments on the coding sheet in general.
As a result of this procedure, we reworded some operational definitions
and indicators to integrate terminologies currently used by professionals
(see Appendices 1 and 2). Afterwards,
with the assistance of a researcher at
the Institute of Research and Community Services, Gadjah Mada University, the reliability was tested.
There is a difference in determining the cutoff of reliability coefficient
acceptance. Krippendoff (1980) reports that the lower limit of acceptance
of reliability coefficient is 0.8, Scott
(1955) puts it over 0.75, while Berelson
(1952) argues that the coefficient
should be between 0.79 and 0.96. The
reliability at this phase is 0.88 or above
the scores proposed by Krippendoff
and Scott, and in the range suggested
by Barelson (see Appendix 6).
As discussed above, this study
uses partial FGD as the appropriate
approach. During the session of approximately 90 minutes, there were
six participants who gave opinions.
The results of the FGD analysis, after
being coded, are presented in quoted
statements containing similarities (consensus) and differences.
From the question “whether the
firm’s CSR program is beneficial”
“From SGM. Supports for my kindergarten are in the form of facilities and
infrastructure. My kindergarten was

built by SGM. Most employees of SGM
in Kemudo are the local people of
Kemudo. When they have to attend
tests, and two applicants have an equal
score (let’s suppose that the applicant
from the Kemudo village has the score
of 90 and so does the applicant from
another village), the firm gives a priority to the person from Kemudo. Furthermore, when the houses of employees are damaged or destroyed, SGM
reconstruct them. Then the roads from
Sari Husada to the village hall of
Kemudo have been asphalted by SGM.
Subsequently, the local ‘posyandu’ (integrated maternity service) receives
milk every month. SGM provides milk
to schools too, and even this is extended to other schools beyond
Kemudo, especially those located in
the valley of SGM. Of equal importance, on the anniversary of SGM they
give special attention to poor people
by distributing staple goods.”
”.. I tell you what, when there was an
earthquake, the supports and supplies
from the government came late. If there
were no firm reconstructing the buildings, when would it be reconstructed,
Sir?”
“The benefit is the establishment of
belief to the PUSKESMAS (primary
health care); the belief is represented
by an increase in visit.”
”... especially related to employment
opportunity. About the employment,
there are about 1,500 employees, with
the basic wage of Rp20,200 daily.”

417

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

”... sometimes my neighbors come to
me when they have school assignments,
for examples on literature, or economics, or other fields. They usually get
articles from me…”
”... since 2004 the price of rice has
been Rp3,000 and soybean ketchup
Rp3,500, and we have enjoyed convenience. Therefore, we were very happy
at that time. Why? We were given
explanations, and more interestingly,
we were recorded in a video and accordingly became more enthusiastic.
We were in a video shot, ate tempe with
soybean ketchup, and used banana
leaves as the plate; we indeed were
very glad. Then we were presented
with gifts. The presents were ketchup
Bango, toothpaste, and soap (as products from Unilever).”
From the question ‘whether they
request for CSR’
“… initially it commenced from the
socialization made by Professor
Widiastudi of UGM to cooperate with
ketchup Bango. Then we agreed, and
thus recommended this program to my
members...”
“… when the earthquake happened,
when the school buildings were totally
damaged and no shelter was available, children had to study under trees.
Then came the firm to help. If no firm
had helped reconstruct the schools
and education, I could not imagine
what it would have been like ...”

418

“… (SGM) had an idle building, someone wanted to rent it for more than
Rp150 million, but the request was
declined. If the PKK could be gathered, perhaps this building could be
used for other purposes. Then SGM
contacted us, and wondered about establishing a playgroup. It needed much
money, but he said, “no problem…”
From the question ‘whether the
firm’s CSR has an impact on the informant’
“Indeed, when I was on TV advertising ketchup Bango, I felt so nervous.”
“… unless there is attention, the mischievous people, particularly the
youths who consume liquor, may go on
protesting, right Sir? But with the program (CSR), the people are grateful.”
“If we go to a supermarket to buy
daily needs and I see the products of
Sari Husada being displayed there, I
feel happy because the company is my
sponsor”
“If I watch TV and see the advertisements of Honda, I will presume that
the brand is superior since when the
earthquake stroke I got charity from
the firm. I still remember that the firm
reconstructed my school building.”
From the question ‘whether the
informant has a tendency to use the
products of the firm that has helped
him’

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

“… The vehicles of the teachers are
Honda, and the transportation means
of our family, by chance, are all
Honda.”
”... To me, I just want ketchup Bango.
So if I buy a product, the ketchup must
be ketchup Bango. If you go to my
house, you will find ketchup Bango. I
buy in the form of plastic container,
and then I refill it into a bottle. The
quantity is the same, but the ketchup in
plastic container is cheaper. And if I
want to make peyek, remember, the
ketchup is ketchup Bango as it is tightly
attached to my heart.”
From the question ‘whether CSR
is a firm strategy’
”... in my opinion, it is not only for
social motivation.”
”... They (Honda) gave pictures to
schools and to the rooms too. It is
renowned as the school of Honda,
that’s it, Sir... and based on our experiences in the past, in a new academic
year, some students living in distant
locations would go to that school. When
I asked why they went to the (distant)
school, they cried and said that they
just wanted to go to the school of
Honda…”
From the aforementioned testimonies of respondents, there are several important facts: (1) CSR program
beneficiaries believe that the CSR program benefits them and the society, (2)
CSR beneficiaries have good attitudes
toward the firm, (3) since it is initiated
by the firm, the program beneficiaries

do not think that the CSR is a threat to
their self-esteem and competencies,
and (4) they also think that the firm’s
CSR is a strategy and not merely social
motivation.

Phase II
After a long intensive debate, there
is an agreement that attitude can be
conceptualized as the total evaluation
of an object (Ajzen 2001; Ajzen and
Fishbein 2000). The expectancy-value
model remains the most popular model
to conceptualize attitude. In this model,
one’s attitude toward an object is determined by the subjective value of the
attributes that interact with the power
of belief. This model assumes that
evaluation decision is formed on the
basis of cognitive process that relates
the object of attitude to important attributes (Maholtra 2005). In other
words, consumers usually and naturally like the brands that they believe
to have the desired characteristics, and
vice versa (Schiffman and Kanuk
1999). However, Assael (2001) find
that there are cases where belief is not
related to attitude, which is when consumers purchase products based on
hedonism such that belief is not relevant anymore with consumer decisions.
Previous studies have indicated
that consumers’ negative perceptions
on a company will affect the consumers’ attitudes toward its CSR activities. Shimp (2000) quoted the study of
Cone/Roper’s Cause-Related Marketing Report in 1999, suggesting that 83
419

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

percent of Americans have a more
positive attitude toward companies that
support activities that they are concerned about. On the other hand, almost half of the sample of research
carried out by Webb and Mohr (1998)
revealed a negative attitude toward
companies, and this was mostly caused
by consumers’ cynicism on the motivation of the companies. Yoon et al.
(2006) studied CSR activities in the
cigarette industry. Although the companies implemented CSR program (donating to the study of cancer), the
companies were perceived negatively
by consumers. Wagner et al. (2009)
show that companies which do not
consistently and seriously implement
CSR activities (hypocrisy) are perceived negatively as counter-productive. Likewise, in their study on reactive and low-fit CSR activities,
Simmons and Becker-Olsen (2004)
find that the low fit between companies’ core products and CSR activities
will result in consumers’ lower responses than the case of high fit between core products and CSR activities. Becker-Olsen et al. (2006) reveal
that although there is high fit, but if it
is considered reactive rather than proactive, this may still result in a negative reaction from consumers. Accordingly, predicated on the aforementioned studies and using the results of
this study in phase 1, the hypothesis
proposed in phase 2 is:
H1 : Consumer belief in a firm implementing CSR influences the
consumer’s attitude toward the
firm.
420

The theory of attribution suggests
that attribution influences attitude and
behavior. According to Takwin (2009),
“Heider’s naïve theory of action” is a
conceptual framework used to interpret, explain, and forecast other
people’s behavior. In this framework,
the concept of intention plays an important role. Dharmmesta (1998) describes intention as: (1) the captor or
intermediary of motivational factors
that have effects on behavior, (2) an
indicator of how hard a person has
attempted to do something, (3) an indicator of the planned attempt, and (4)
something closely related to the real
behavior. Brown and Dacin (1997),
Creyer and Ross (1997), Ellen et al.
(2000), and Lee et al. (2008) find that
there is a correlation between a company implementing CSR and consumers’ attitudes toward the firm’s products. Barone et al. (2000) argue that
CSR activities will affect consumers’
preferences for trademarks. Almost
similarly, the study by Smith and
Alcorn (1991) suggests that consumers wish to switch to another brand and
even are willing to pay more expensive products of companies performing CSR activities (for typical goods).
Therefore, it is hypothesized that:
H2 : Consumer’s attitude toward the
firm that implements CSR influences the consumer’s purchase
intention toward the products
of the firm.
The conceptual model of this hypothesis is presented in Figure 1.

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

X

Figure 1. Model of CSR Belief, Attitude and Purchase Intention
X1 W

X3 W

Beliefs toward
Corporation’s
CSR

H1
X

Attitudes
toward
Corporation

H2
X

X

X

X

X4

X5

X6

Method
Population and Sample
The population of this study is
those who have benefited from CSR
programs after the earthquake of May
27, 2006 in the form of school building. The scope of the study is parents
whose children are studying at schools
receiving charity from CSR programs.
The sample of this study is collected
using the purposive sampling method.
Purposive sampling is a non-probabilistic sample taking that meets particular criteria (Cooper and Schindler
2006). Bailey (1994) says that the advantage of the purposive sampling technique is that researchers can use their
previous capabilities and experiences
to select respondents. In line with the
objective, the criteria used in the selection of respondents are: (1) the respondents are adult, (2) the respondents are
able to read and write (literate), and (3)
the respondents are willing to get involved in the study.
The steps in the sample generation are as follows: (1) observing
schools, whose developments after the
earthquake of May 27, 2006 were sup-

Purchase
Intentions

X X8
X

X9

X

X2 W

X7

X10

ported by a particular firm through the
CSR program, (2) determining the
schools that will be selected as objects
of this study, and (3) determining students’ parents to be included in the
sample.

Data Collection
Of the schools supported by firms,
only the schools known to have been
supported by firms that offer products
(in line with the question items) were
selected. Appendix 2 presents the profiles of elementary schools selected as
the objects of this study.
After determining the study objects, the next step was to select classes
to which the questionnaires would be
handed out. The questionnaires asked
students about their experiences at a
school. Those who had been studying
at the school which the earthquake
destroyed were selected as the sample.
To these students, questionnaires were
handed out to their parents to be filled
out. Being completed by their parents,
the questionnaires were returned to
the classroom teacher. When the questionnaires were distributed to the parents, we expounded to them in details
on how to complete the questionnaires.
421

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

X

Figure 1. Model of CSR Belief, Attitude and Purchase Intention
X1 W

X3 W

Beliefs toward
Corporation’s
CSR

H1
X

Attitudes
toward
Corporation

H2
X

X

X

X

X4

X5

X6

Purchase
Intentions

X X8
X

X9

X

X2 W

X7

X10

Measurements

Instrument Analysis

The questionnaires comprised two
major sections. The first component
asked about beliefs and attitudes of
respondents toward firms that implement CSR, and respondents’ purchase
intentions toward the products of the
firms. The second part contained the
profiles of respondents. The question
items were modified from the previous studies of Irwin et al. (2003) and
Pomering and Dolcinar (2008) by considering the results obtained in phase
1. Mustakini (2008) suggests that when
the question items are translated from
English into Indonesian, it is necessary to make sure that the translation
has been correct and accurate. We
consulted with a linguistic expert from
the Faculty of Cultural Sciences of
Gadjah Mada University to translate
the question items from English into
Indonesian. The translated version was
then re-translated into English by a
colleague who has studied overseas.
The objective was to identify possible
significant differences in translation
works between the original question
items and the final question items to be
used in this study.

Field test was made to measure
social desirability and construct validity (reliability and validity). Social
desirability is defined as respondents’
tendencies to present themselves in a
favorable position with regard to social norm (Nunnaly in Jo et al. 1997).
It is usually perceived as a personal
tendency that becomes the part of someone, putting him or her in a place that
he or she likes although it may be
different from the real feeling. Cooper
and Schindler (2006) postulate that
there is a tendency for respondents to
be dishonest in answering the questions in a social study as they refuse or
feel ashamed of the topic of study,
dislike the topic, and feel afraid of the
consequences (of the answers). To
anticipate this social desirability bias,
Junaedi (2006) made a comparison
between the answers from direct questioning and those from indirect questioning.
Validity in this study was tested
by calculating the values of convergent validity and discriminate validity. Fornell and Larcker (1981) mention that the criteria of convergent va-

422

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

lidity are as follows: (1) loading factor
of more than 0.7 and significant and
(2) value of AVE (Average Variance
Extracted) of higher than 0.5. Meanwhile, for discriminate validity the
value of AVE is higher than the value
of squared correlation of the construct
pairs. Ghozali (2008) argues that the
loading value of 0.5 to 0.6 is acceptable. Subsequently, reliability was
examined by calculating the value of
Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability. Nunnaly in Ghozali (2005) used
the cut-off point of 0.7 for composite
reliability.

Data Analysis
This study uses descriptive analysis and component-based structural
equation model/ partial least squares
(Smart PLS version 2.0). PLS is a
technique that generalizes and combines principal component analysis and
multiple regression. Barclay et al. in
Chwelos (2001) note that PLS is better
when the focus is on theory development, whereas LISREL is preferred
for confirmatory testing of the fit of a
theoretical model to observed data,
thereby requiring stronger theory than
PLS. Citing some research, Lu et al.
(2007) suggest that PLS is a commonly used statistical analysis for latent variables, and it can be used to
confirm the validity of the constructs
of an instrument and assess the structural relationships among constructs.
The use of PLS, in accordance with the
objective of this study, is to confirm
the validity of the constructs of an
instrument and identify the predictive

linear relations among variables. In
PLS, optimal linear relations among
latent variables are calculated and interpreted as the best predictive relations despite their limitations (Ghozali
2008).
There are several additional advantages of the use of PLS. First, it
does not require a large sample. Nijssen
and Douglas (2008) find that PLS is
effective at formative and reflective
latent constructs, freely distributed (not
necessarily normal), and very strong
to analyze small-sized sample. According to Pinto et al. (2008) and Lee
(2001), PLS only requires small
sample. Mahmood et al. (2004) reveal
that the analysis techniques in PLS
require minimum scale, sample size,
and residual distribution. In addition,
Birkinshaw et al. (1995) suggest that
PLS is used when only small-sized
sample could be collected, assumptions of multivariate normality and
interval scale could not be proved, and
the focus of study is on predicting
dependent variables. Graham et al.
(1994) confirm the aforementioned
opinions and add that PLS is more
robust with a small sample. Second, it
is not affected by multi-collinearity
problem. In the study of Inkpen and
Birkenshaw (1994), all relations were
modeled simultaneously to avoid
multicollinearity, so they used PLS.
Third, it does not require normal distributions of data and error term. Pirouz
(2006) suggests some advantages of
PLS: (1) it can be used in the model
with many dependent and independent variables, (2) it is a robust testing
423

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

Table 1. Resume of Comparative Difference between Covariant-based and
Variant-based
No

Criteria

Covariant-based

1.

Assumption

Multivariate normal
distribution.

Not necessarily normally
distributed.

Requiring absence of
multicolinearity.

Able to manage multicollinear
problems.

2.

Data

Variant-based

Unable to handle missing Able to handle (robust) to
data and noise data.
analyze missing data and noise
data.
Only able to handle
continuous data.

Able to handle (robust)
nominal, ordinal, and
continuous data.

3.

Number of
Analysis Unit

Large.

Small.

4.

Complexity of
model

Little to medium
complexity (less than
100 indicators).

Large complexity
(100 constructs and 1000
indicators).

5.

Relation
Only able to handle
between latent reflective indicator.
variable and
the indicators

for missing and noise data, (3) it can be
used for reflective and formative latent data, and (4) it can handle nominal, ordinal, and continuous scales.
In brief, the differences between
variance-based and covariance-based
analyses are presented in Table 1.

Results
Answers to the questions obtained
in phase 1 were then tested to 30 undergraduate students of Gadjah Mada

424

Able to handle both reflective
and formative indicators.

University. The testing was conducted
to identify whether there was social
desirability. There were 11 direct questions and 11 indirect questions tested.
Since the direct and the indirect questions were given to the same students
consecutively, the social desirability
could be examined using the pairedsample test. The results of this analysis
suggest that there is no difference between answers acquired from direct
questioning and those gathered through
indirect questioning (Table 2).

Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 3
Pair 4
Pair 5
Pair 6
Pair 7
Pair 8
Pair 9
Pair 10
Pair 11

Bel_1 - Bel_1b
Bel_2 - Bel_2b
Bel_3 - Bel_3b
Bel_4 - Bel_4b
Bel_5 - Bel_5b
Bel_6 - Bel_6b
Bel_7 - Bel_7b
Bel_8 - Bel_8b
Bel_9 - Bel_9b
Bel_1 0- Bel_10b
Bel_11 - Bel_11b

0.233
-0.167
0.067
0.200
0.667
-0.133
0.067
0.033
-0.133
-0.167
0.000

Mean
0.728
0.747
0.521
0.847
0.828
0.681
1.229
1.273
1.137
0.874
0.743

Std. Dev.

Table 2. Output of Social Desirability Test

0.133
0.136
0.095
0.154
0.151
0.124
0.225
0.232
0.208
0.160
0.136

Std. Error
Mean
-0.038
0.445
-0.128
-0.116
-0.242
-0.388
-0.393
-0.441
-0.557
-0.493
-0.277

Lower
0.505
0.112
0.261
0.516
0.376
0.121
0.526
0.508
0.291
0.160
0.277

Upper

95% Confidence
Interval of
the Difference

Paired Differences

Paired Samples Test

1.756
-1.223
0.701
1.293
0.441
-1.072
0.297
0.143
-0.643
-1.044
0.000

t

29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29

df

0.090
0.231
0.490
0.206
0.662
0.293
0.769
0.887
0.526
0.305
1.000

Sig. (2-tailed)

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

425

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

Table 3. Output of Validity Test
Attitude
Att_1
Att_2
Att_3
Bel_1
Bel_1
Bel_1
BI_1
BI_2
BI_3
BI_4
BI_5

B_Intention

Belief

0.888
0.656
0.848
0.835
0.753
0.798
0.511
0.217
0.856
0.832
0.903

Table 4. Output of Validity Test After Item BI_2 Dropped
Attitude
Att_1
Att_2
Att_3
Bel_1
Bel_1
Bel_1
BI_1
BI_3
BI_4
BI_5

426

B_Intention

Belief

0.888
0.658
0.847
0.835
0.753
0.799
0.511
0.855
0.834
0.903

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

Table 5. Output of Validity and Realibility Test
Constructs

AVE

Composite
Reliability

Cronbachs
Alpha

R2

Communality

Redundancy

Attitude
B_Intention

0.646
0.626

0.844
0.866

0.728
0.794

0.483
0.317

0.646
0.626

0.311
0.191

Belief

0.634

0.838

0.717

Since there was no difference between items of direct and those of
indirect questions, in the next step
only the direct questions were utilized
(because the indirect questions needed
a different method for validity and
reliability tests). The 11 items of direct
question were then examined for their
validities by seeking the scores of convergent validity and concurrent validity. Validity testing was done to 64
respondents (students’ parents) at
Sawit Elementary School, Kecamatan
Gantiwarno, Klaten. The initial questions were filter questions. Cooper and
Schindler (2006) postulate that filter
questions are used to qualify respondents’ knowledge. In this questionnaire, the filter questions are questions
as to whether they know that their
children’s schools were reconstructed
with supports from a specific firm with
specific products and brands.
The results of the validity test
conclude that a question must be
dropped as it does not reach the required cut-off score (Table 3).
After the question was excluded
from the survey instrument, the validity of question items was retested. The
results suggest that the question items

0.634

are valid as they have met the required
conditions (Table 4).
In the wake of the validity testing
(from which valid questions were obtained), the testing was followed up by
the reliability test. The results of the
reliability testing provide evidence that
question items have also met the required reliability criteria (Table 5).

Profiles of Respondents
To the filter questions, all students’ parents answer that they know
the reconstruction of their children’s
schools were sponsored by a particular
firm. This supports the interview answers by the headmaster who says that
the information on the reconstruction
sponsorship has been informed to the
students’ parents in meetings. Of the
total 166 questionnaires delivered to
the students of Sanggrahan Elementary School, Pesu Elementary School,
and Dahromo Elementary School, all
questionnaires returned. The high response rate was due to the cooperations with classroom teachers and the
incentives offered to those returning
the questionnaires. Of the total questionnaires returned, nine questionnaires are not fully completed such
427

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

Table 6. Respondent Demographic Profile (N = 157)
Variable

Variable

Gender

Monthly Earning

Male
Female

46.50
53.50

< UMR
1UMR - 2UMR
2UMR - 3UMR
> 3UMR

63.00
54.00
26.00
14.00

Min
Max
Mean

17.00
66.00
42.60

Occupation
Civil Servant
Household Wife
Farmer
Trader
Private Company
Other

32.00
38.00
22.00
16.00
10.00
44.00

Age

Education
Elementary School
Junior High School
Senior High School
Academy
University
Graduated Program
*)

56.00
33.00
40.00
13.00
15.00
0.00

UMR = Regional Minimum Subsistance Wage

Table 7. Respondents’ Belief, Attitude, and Purchase Intention Related to
CSR Program in Bantul and Klaten
Level of Agreement (%)
Survey Item

Strongly
Disagree

Strongly
Agree

1. CSR creates positive image to the
company

1.30

4.50

0.00 25.50 68.80

2. CSR should be the standard
component of corporate activity

3.20

2.50

9.60 29.30 55.40

3. CSR is positive in modern business 3.20

2.50

4.50 29.30 60.50

4. I like the company that implements
CSR
1.30

0.60

3.20 20.40 74.50

428

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

Continued from Table 7
Level of Agreement (%)
Survey Item

Strongly
Disagree

5. I am glad to see the company that
implements CSR more than once in 2.50
a year (frequent)

Strongly
Agree

3.20

9.60 24.80 59.90

3.80 35.70 56.70

6. I have better impression to the
company that implements CSR

2.50

1.30

7. I prefer the products of the
company that implements CSR

1.90

5.10 13.40 27.40 52.20

5.70

7.60

9.60 35.70

41.4

3.80

3.80

10.2

36.3

45.9

1.90

1.30

7.60

24.2 65.00

8. Information that the company
implements CSR becomes a
consideration for me to purchase
a product
9. I will recommend to purchase
a product of the company that
implements CSR
10. If there are two products at the
same price and quality,
I prefer buying the product of the
company that implements CSR
that only 157 can be analyzed further.
The demographic profiles of respondents are presented in the following
Table 6.
Table 6 depicts that the average
age of respondents is 42.6 years. The
percentage of female respondents is
53.5 percent of which 24.2 percent are
housewives. Most respondents graduated from elementary school (35.7%),
and have incomes of less than or equal
to the regional minimum wage (40.1%).

Table 7 describes the distribution
of respondents’ answers to the questions. The table shows that most respondents answer “totally agree” to
the questions of the questionnaires.
No respondent answers “not sure” to
the question on whether CSR creates a
positive image for the firm (question
item 1). Although there are respondents saying “totally disagree” and
“disagree” to the question, most respondents say that they “totally agree”
(68.8%).
429

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

Table 8. The Cooeficient of Regression Beta and T-Value

Attitude ->
Purchase
Intention
Belief ->
Attitude

Original
Sample
(O)

Sample
Mean
(M)

Standard
Deviation
(STDEV)

Standard
Error
(STERR)

TStatistics
(|O/STERR|)

0.611

0.645

0.083

0.083

7.395

0.442

0.488

0.099

0.099

4.482

Structural Model for the Total
Sample
The analysis results show accordance with the existing data. As hypothesized in H1, belief positively and
significantly influences attitude toward
the firm. Similarly, as hypothesized in
H2, attitude positively and significantly
affects purchase intentions (Table 8).
Charity activities began immediately after the earthquake on May 27,
2006. In pro-social behavior, these
activities (phenomena) are categorized
as having different motivations and
objectives. The beneficiaries of school
reconstructions do not feel that their
self-esteem is endangered or disgraced
with respect to their competencies,
such that their reactions are emotionally positive and less likely to refuse
the supports. According to the attribution theory, people are motivated to
understand why they need help and
why other people offer help. If they
can relate their needs to external power
that is uncontrollable or beyond their

430

competencies, they could maintain
their self-esteem positively.
This study finds that people tend
to reciprocate the received supports.
With regard to the firm that has helped
them in the form of CSR, it seems that
the consumers have a positive attitude
toward the firm. This attitude toward
the firm fully mediates between belief
and purchase intention toward the products of the firm.

Conclusions, Limitations,
and Suggestions
The objective of this paper is to
investigate whether CSR leads to a
decrease in competitiveness by identifying beliefs, attitudes, and purchase
intentions of the consumers of the CSR
program toward the products of the
firm. The findings do not support the
CSR activities, especially CSR-philanthropy, thereby resulting in a decrease in competitiveness. This is
clearly seen in the testing of belief,
attitude, and purchase intention, where

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

attitude fully mediates the relation
between belief and purchase intention.
This research has contributed to
improving our understanding of the
effect of CSR activities on consumers.
From the pro-social theory perspective, CSR activities performed by firms
indicate how the firms pro-socially
respond to a particular condition. When
the firms are faced with an emergency
situation, they take five important steps,
which include the decision making to
inhibit or to give a chance to pro-social
responses. The firms have to realize
the emergency situation, appropriately
interpret the ongoing moment, take a
responsibility and capacity to help,
and make a decision to help. These
steps are particularly performed when
the firms are interested in an event and
attribute it as an uncontrollable moment. From the attribution theory perspective, CSR activities are based on
the expectation that the program recipients can make correspondent inferences that the firms have performed
positive activities, which in turn may
improve the firms’ (and their products’) images.
From the perspective of valueexpectancy and hierarchy of effect
models, the decision to have a particular behavior is a result of rational processes directed to a particular goal,
and it follows a logical sequence. Behavioral preference is considered, consequences and results of the behavior
are evaluated, and a decision on
whether to take actions is then made.
CSR activities result in the formation

of beliefs and attitudes of the recipients toward the firms. Positive attitude
toward a firm will in turn generate the
intention to buy the products of the
firm.
In principal, CSR communications
are similar to product/service marketing communications, which are to create a positive perception of the targeted public. The involvement of the
targeted public in CSR communications is an advantage when compared
to other marketing communications.
On the other hand, the disadvantage is
that the results of CSR communications may be capitalized on only in the
long run. In some cases in Indonesia
and other countries, CSR communication is a crisis communication, meaning that when firms are challenged by
crisis circumstances, they will implement CSR communications. One of
the rationales is that those firms fear
for a vast array of donation proposals
and also prejudice in the society. This
study suggests that it is not necessary
for a firm to wait until the crisis occurs
to implement CSR communications.
This is in line with the results of study
carried out by Fombrun et al. (2000),
which finds that CSR communications
could be justified as a strategy in which
the company can decrease or limit the
potential negative consequences of a
crisis.
There are some limitations of this
study that deserve adequate attention
in future studies. In the data collection
in phase 1 through FGD, only six participants were recruited, and they came
from different CSR activities. How431

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

ever, in phase 2, this study uses a
survey to consumers (those benefited
by CSR program in the form of school
reconstruction). In the future, this survey can be extended to other consumers, including partnerships with farm-

ers and health services. It is also necessary to test if other forms of CSR
programs, other than philanthropy, also
affect the correlation between consumers and the firm’s products.

References
Abidin, H., A. Prihatna., Z. Saidi., R. A. Suprapto., S. Supomo and Kurniawati. 2003.
Sumbangan Sosial Perusahaan. Jakarta: Piramedia.
Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. 2000. Attitude and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and
automatic processes. In Strobe, W., and Hewstone, M. (Eds.), European Review
Social Psychology. Chichester England: Wiley: 1-33.
Ajzen, I. 2001. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review Psychology 52 (1): 2758.
Assael, H. 2001. Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action (6th ed.). Singapore: Thompson Learning.
Baron, R. A., and D. Byrne. 2003. Social Psychology (10th ed.). New York: Pearson
Education.
Bailey, K. D. 1994. Methods of Social Research (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
BAPPENAS. The Provincial and Local Governments of D.I.Yogyakarta, the Provincial
and Local Governments of Central Java and International Partners. 2006. Preliminary Damage and Loss Assessment: Yogyakarta and Central Java Natural Disaster.
Jakarta: World Bank and Asian Development Bank.
Barone, M. J., A. D. Miyazaki., and K. A. Taylor. 2000. The Influence of Caused-Related
Marketing on Consumer Choice: Does One Good Turn Deserve Another? Academy
of Marketing Science 28 (2): 248-262.
Barry, T. E. 1987. The Development of the Hierarchy of Effects: An Historical Perspective. In Leigh, J.H., and Martin, C.R. (Eds.), Current Issues and Research in
Advertising 10. Ann Arbor: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business
Administration, University of Michigan, 251-296.
Becker-Olsen, K. L., B. A. Cudmore., and R. P. Hill. 2006. The Impact of Perceived
Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Research 59: 46-53.
Berelson, B. 1952. Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Hafner
Press.
Beurden, P., and T. Gossling. 2008. The Worth of Values-A Literature Review on the
Relation between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Journal of Business
Ethics 82: 407-24.

432

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake
Birkinshaw, J., A. Morrison., and J. Hulland. 1995. Structural and Competitive Determinants of A Global Integration Strategy. Strategic Management Journal 16 (8): 637655.
Brown, T. J. and P. A. Dacin. 1997. The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. Journal of Marketing 16: 68-84.
Bryman, A. 1988. Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman.
Churchill, G. A. 2001. Basic Marketing Research (4th ed.). Chicago: The Dryden Press.
Chwelos, P., I. Benbasat., and A. Dexter. 2001. Research report: Empirical test of an EDI
adoption model. Information Systems Research 12 (3): 304-321.
Cooper, D. R. and P. S. Schindler. 2006. Business Research Methods (9th ed.). Boston:
McGraw-Hill International Edition.
Copley, J. W. 1988. Relationships Between Beliefs, Attitudes, Intentions and Perception
in An Hypnotic Induction: An Examination of Two Models of Estimating Future
Behavior. Texas: Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University. Dissertation, Not
Published.
Creyer, E. H., and W. T. Ross. 1997. The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention:
Do consumer really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing 14
(6): 419-432.
DePaulo, B. M., P. L. Brown., S. Ishii., and J. D. Fisher. 1981. Help that works: The effects
of aid on subsequent task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41: 478-487.
Dharmmesta, B. S. 1998. Theory of planned behavior dalam penelitian sikap, niat dan
perilaku konsumen. Kelola 18 (VII): 85-103.
Ellen, P. S., L. A. Mohr., and D. J. Webb. 2000. Charitable programs and retailer: Do they
mix? Journal of Retailing 76 (3): 393-406.
Faturochman. 2006. Pengantar Psikologi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka.
Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. New Jersey: Prentiss-Hall, Inc.
Fisher, D. J., A. Nadler., and S. Whitcher-Alagna. 1982. Recipient reactions to aid.
Psychological Bulletin 91: 27-54.
Fombrum, C. J., N. A. Gardberg., and M. L. Barnett. 2000. Opportunity platforms and
safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputation risk. Business and Society Review
105 (1): 85-106.
Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation model with unobservable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research XVIII: 39 - 50.
Frederick, W. C. 1994. From CSR1 to CSR2. Business and Society 33 (2): 150-164.
Ghozali, I. 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan
Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
——————. 2008. Structural Equation Modeling: Metode Alternatif dengan Partial
Least Square (2nd ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

433

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3
Graham, J. L., A. T. Mintu., and W. Rodgers. 1994. Explorations of negotiation behaviors
in ten foreign cultures using a model developed in the United States. Management
Science 40 (1): 72-95.
Griffin, J. J. 2000. Corporate Social Performance: Research Directions for the 21st
Century. Business and Society 39 (4): 479-491.
Hendarto, K. A. 2008. Tanggung jawab sosial dan lingkungan perusahaan (CSR) di
Indonesia dalam wacana pers nasional. Proceeding, Konferensi Nasional Forum
Manajemen Up 2 Date. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.
Hervey, J. H., W. J. Ickes., and R. F. Kidd. 1976. New Directions of Attribution Research
(Vol. 1). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.
Holsti, O. R. 1963. The quantitative analysis of content. In Robinson, J. A., ed., Content
Analysis: A Handbook With Application for the Study of International Crisis.
Northwestern: Northwestern University Press: 37-53.
Inkpen, A. C., and J. Birkinshaw. 1994. International joint ventures and performance: An
interorganizational perspective. Business Review 3 (3): 201-217.
Irwanto. 2006. Focused Group Discussion: Sebuah Pengantar Praktis. Jakarta: Yayasan
Obor Indonesia.
Irwin, R. L., T. Lachowetz., T. B. Cornwell., and J. S. Clark. 2003. Cause-related sport
sponsorship: An assessment of spectator beliefs, attitudes, and behavioral intentions.
Sport Marketing Quarterly 12 (3): 131 - 139.
Jo, M. S., J. E. Nelson., and P. Kiecker. 1997. A model for controlling social responsibility
bias by direct and indirect questioning. Marketing Letter 8 (4): 429-437.
Jogiyanto, H. M. 2008. Pedoman Survei Kuisioner: Mengembangkan Kuesioner, Mengatasi
Bias dan Meningkatkan Respon. Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomika
dan Bisnis UGM dan Majelis Guru Besar UGM.
Junaedi, S. 2006. Pengaruh orientasi nilai, afek dan pengetahuan ekologikal pada komitmen
pembelian produk yang berwawasan lingkungan: Studi perilaku konsumen pangan
organik. Dissertation (Not Published). Yogyakarta: Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM.
Kassarjian, H.H. 1977. Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer
Research 4: 8-18.
Krippendoff, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Baverly Hill
CA: Sage.
Krueger, R. A. 1994. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (2nd ed.).
Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Lee, D. Y. 2001. Power, conflict and satisfaction in IJV supplier-Chinese distributor
channels. Business Research 53 (2): 149-160.
Lee, H., T. Park., H. K. Moon., Y. Yang., and C. Kim. 2008. Corporate philanthropy,
attitude toward corporations, and purchase intention: A South Korea atudy. Journal
of Business Ethics. DOI 10.1016/j.busres.2008.08.007.
Lu, E. Y., H. Ma., S. Turner., and W. Huang. 2007. Wireless internet and student-centered
learning: A partial least-squares model. Computer and Education 49: 530-544.
434

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake
Mahmood, M. A., K. Bagchi., and T. C. Ford. 2004. On-line shopping behavior: Crosscountry empirical research. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 9 (1): 930.
Malhotra, N. K. 2004. Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (4th ed.). Upper
Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
——————. 2005. Attitude and affect: New frontiers of research in the 21st Century.
Journal of Business Research 58: 477-482.
Mashoedi, S. F. 2009. Tingkah laku menolong. In Sarwono, S. W., and E. A. Meinanrno.
(Eds.), Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika: 121-144.
Mowen, J. C., and M. Minor. 2001. Consumer Behavior (5th ed.). New York: Harcout, Inc.
Nijssen, E. J., and S. P. Douglas. 2008. Consumer world-mindedness, social-mindedness
and store image. Journal of International Marketing 16 (3): 84-107.
Peter, J. P., and J. C. Olson. 1996. Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy (4th ed.).
New York: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
Pinto, J. R., A. I. R. Escudero., and J. G. Cillian. 2008. Order, positioning, scope, and
outcomes of market entry. Industrial Marketing Management 37 (2): 154-166.
Pirouz, D. M. 2006. An Overview of Partial Least Square. Accessible from: http://
www.merage.uci.edu/%7Edipirouz04/. [Accessed 6th October 2009].
Pomering, A., and S. Dolcinar. 2008. Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR
implementation: Are consumers aware of CSR initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1007/S10551-008-9729-9.
Roediger, H. L., J. P. Rushto., E. D. Capaldi., and S. G. Paris. 1984. Psychology (9th ed.).
Boston: Little Brown and Company.
Sciffman, L. G., and L. L. Kanuk. 1999. Consumer Behavior (7th ed.). New Jersey: Upper
Saddle River.
Sears, D. O., J. L. Freedman., and L. A. Peplau. 1985. Social Psychology (5th ed.). Boston:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Scott, W. 1955. Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public
Opinion Quarterly 17: 321-325.
Shaw, M. and P. H. Curtanzo. 1982. Theories of Social Psychology. New York: McGrawHill.
Shimp, T. A. 2000. Advertising Promotion and Supplemental Aspect of Integrated
Marketing Communications (5th ed.). Ohio: South-Western College Publication.
Simmons, C. S., and K. L. Becker-Olsen. 2004. Achieving marketing objectives through
social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing 70: 154-169.
Smith, S. M., and D. S. Alcorn. 1991. Cause marketing: A new direction in the marketing
of corporate responsibility. The Journal of Consumer Marketing 8 (3): 19-35.
Steward, D. W. and Shandasani. 1990. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Thousand
Oaks CA: Sage.
Takwin, B. 2009. Persepsi sosial mengenali dan mengerti orang lain. In Sarwono, S. W.,

435

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3
and E. A. Meinanrno. (Eds.), Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika: 21-49.
Tessler, R. C., and S. H. Schwartz. 1972. Help-seeking, self-esteem, and achievement
motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21: 318-326.
Wagner T., R. J. Lutz., and B. A. Witz. 2009. Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat
of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing 73:
77-91.
Webb, D. J., and L. A. Mohr. 1998. A typology of consumer responses to cause-related
marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy and
Marketing 17 (2): 226-238.
Wicaksono, B. 2005. Diskusi kelompok terarah. In Dwiyanto, A., (ed.), Mewujudkan
Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University
Press: 278-301.
Woodside, A. G. 2010. Bridging the chasm between survey and case study research:
Research methods for achieving generalization, accuracy, and complexity. Industrial
Marketing Management 39: 64-75.
Yoon, Y., Z. Gurhan-Canli., and N. Schwarz. 2006. The effect of corporate social
responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of
Consumer Psychology 16 (4): 377-390.

436

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

APPENDIX 1. Informants Involved in FGD
No

Name

1

Indarti

Forms of CSR
Development of Pertiwi
Kindergaten Building,
Kemudo

Companies
PT Sari Husada

2

Siti Subiati

Development of Schoolbuilding of Dahromo
Elementary School, Pleret

PT Astra Honda
Motor

3

Sutanto

Development of Building of
PUSKESMAS II Berbah

PT Media Group

4

Aris Daryono

“Bagimu Guru”, newspaper
subscription at special rate

PT Gramedia

5

Slamet

Partnership with black soybean
farmers

PT Unilever

6

Gunarso

Tobacco farming partnership

PT Perkebunan
Nusantara IX

7

Widiantoro

Moderator

Indonesia
Consumer Watch
Foundation (YLKI)

APPENDIX 2. Profile of Elementary Schools
School
Name

Address

CSR’s Company

Respondent

Sawit

Sawit, Gantiwarno,
Klaten

PT Astra Honda Motor

62
(validity and
realibility)

Dahromo

Dahromo, Pleret,
Bantul

PT Astra Honda Motor

58

Sanggrahan

Kemudo, Prambanan,
Klaten

PT Sari Husada

46

Pesu

Pesu, Wedi, Klaten

Eka Tjipta Foundation
(Sinar Mas Grup)

62

437

†

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

APPENDIX 4. Coding Sheet
1. Title of Program

:

2. Day

:

3. Date

:

4. Moderator
5. Topic

:
:

6. Number of Participants :
7. Language(s) spoken

:

8. Format of Program

:

† Indonesian
† Interactive

† Javanish
† Interview

† Both
† Both

8. Participants of discussion (informan) are the persons who
have felt the benefit of corporate CSR
9. Moderator asks informan’s perception on the companies implementing CSR
10. Moderator is in neutral position to what is said by informant
11. Informans state that CSR has positive impact on them
12. Informans state that CSR also has positive impact on community
13. Informans have favour (good) feeling to companies implementing CSR

† Yes
† Yes
† Yes
† Yes
† Yes
† Yes

† No
† No
† No
† No
† No
† No

† Yes

† No

† Yes

† No

† Yes
† Yes

† No
† No

† Yes
† Yes
† Yes
† Yes

† No
† No
† No
† No

† Yes

† No

† Yes

† No

† Yes

† No

14. Informans state that they have close relation with the companies
implementing CSR
15. Informans state that CSR improve corporate image
16. Informans state that corporate CSR can be information to introduce
the company’s products
17. Informans correlate the companies implementing CSR and the products
18. Informans are likely to prefer the products from the companies
that give aid to them (loyal)
19. Informans state that CSR is a corporate strategy (marketing)
20. Informans state that CSR has to be regulated by the government
21. Some informans state that CSR is obligatory for corporates
22. Some informans state that CSR is implemented only when
corporates get profits
23. Some informans state that for particular matters, CSR
is implemented after the community request for it
24. Informans state that corporate CSR can be in nonmaterial aid. (such as waste and groundwater treatment, etc.)

438

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

APPENDIX 5. Explanation for Coding Sheet
1.

Title of Program

: write the title of program

2.

Day

: write the-day of program

3.

Date

: write the date of program

4.

Moderator

: write the name of the moderator

5.

Topic

: write the topic

6.

Number of Participants

: write the number of participants

7.

Language(s) spoken

Clear enough

8.

Format of Program

Interactive:multilateral
Interview: unilateral

8.

Participants of discussion (informan) are the

†1
†1
†1
†1
†1
†1
†1
†1
†0

†0
†0
†0
†0
†0
†0
†0

†1

†0

Perception: cognitive process
in everybody in understanding
the information of environment,
eitherby seeing, listening,
smelling, or comprehending

†1

†0

10. Moderator is in neutral position to what is said
by informant

Neutral: impartial

†1

†0

11. Informans state that CSR has positive impact
on them

Clear enough

†1

†0

12. Informans state that CSR also has positive impact
on community

Clear enough

†1

†0

13. Informans have favour (good) feeling to
companies implementing CSR.

Clear enough

†1

†0

14. Informans state that they have close relation with
the companies implementing CSR.

Clear enough

15. Informans state that CSR improve corporate image

Clear enough

†1
†1

†0
†0

16. Informans state that corporate CSR can be
information to introduce the company’s products

Clear enough

†1

†0

17. Informans correlate the companies implementing
CSR and the products.

Clear enough

†1

†0

Loyal: no change of mind
towards something

†1

†0

19. Informans state that CSR is a corporate strategy
(marketing).

Clear enough

†1

†0

20. Informans state that CSR has to be regulated
by the government.

Clear enough

†1

†0

persons who have felt the benefit of corporate CSR Clear enough
9.

Moderator asks informan’s perception on
the companies implementing CSR

18. Informans are likely to prefer the products from
the companies that give aid to them (loyal).

439

Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, September-December 2009, Vol. 11, No. 3

Continued from APPENDIX 5
21. Some informans state that CSR is obligatory for
corporates.

Clear enough

†1

†0

22. Some informans state that CSR is implemented
only when corporates get profits.

Clear enough

†1

†0

23. Some informans state that for particular matters,
CSR is implemented after the community
request for it.

Clear enough

†1

†0

24. Informans state that corporate CSR can be in nonmaterial aid. (such as waste and groundwater
treatment, etc.).

Clear enough

†1

†0

APPENDIX 6. Reliability Test on Phase 1
No

Coder-1

Coder-2

Value
Coder-1 = Coder-2 J1
Coder-1 ≠ Coder-2 J1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

440

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1

Hendarto—The Implementation of CSR in Central Java Earthquake

Continued from APPENDIX 6
No

Coder-1

Coder-2

Value
Coder-1 = Coder-2 J1
Coder-1 ≠ Coder-2 J1

22
23
24

1
1
1

R=

1
1
1

1
1
1

2 (C1,2)
C1 + C2
2 (21)

=

24 + 24

= 0.875
APPENDIX 7. Validity and Reliability Test on Phase 2
Alt_3
W

W

Alt_2
W

Alt_1

0.888 0.656 0.848
Belief

B_Intention
0.561

Attitude
W

W

W

Bel_3

W

W

W

Bel_2

W

0.903
0.512
0.217 0.050 0.832

0.835 0.753 0.798
Bel_1

0.315

W

W

0.000

0.483

W

0.695

Inten_1 Inten_2 Inten_3 Inten_4 Inten_5

APPENDIX 8. Validity and Reliability Re-test on Phase 2
Alt_3
W

W

Alt_2
W

Alt_1

0.888 0.658 0.848
Belief
0.563

Attitude
W

Inten_1

Inten_3

W

W

Bel_3

0.855 0.835
W

W

W

Bel_2

0.903

0.511

0.835 0.753 0.799
Bel_1

0.317

Inten_4

W

W

0.000

B_Intention
0.483

W

0.695

Inten_5

441