al Journal of Australia, 145, 657-658.
The impact of health status A (Wahyun.
Holman.
Armstrong.
Arias.
Martin, et al.
The quantification of drug caused morbidity and mortality in Australia.
Commonwealth Department of Community Services and Health.
Canberra.
Jackle.
R, and O.
Himmler.
AuHealth and Wages Ae Panel Data Estimates Considering Selection and Endogeneity,Ay Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
MPRA Paper No.
11578/08,
http://mpra.
de/11578/, accessed 18 June 2009, 13.
30 west Indonesian Jha.
J Chaloupka.
C Gupta.
Peck, et al.
, 2006.
Tobacco addiction.
Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries, 2nd Edition, 869-886.
Oxford University Press.
New York.
Lee.
AuHealth and Wages: A Simultaneous Equation Model with Multiple Discrete Indicators,Ay International Economic Review, 23.
Levine.
Gustafson.
and Velenchik A.
AuMore bad news for smokers? The effects of cigarette smoking on wages,Ay Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 50.
Loh.
AuProductivity Differences and the Marriage Wage Premium for White Males,Ay Journal of Human Resources, 31, 566-589.
Lye.
N, and Hirschberg.
AuAlcohol Consumption.
Smoking and Wages,Ay Applied Economics.
Taylor and Francis Journals, 36.
,18071817, http://w.
au/downloads/wpapers-0001/764.
pdf, accessed 18 June 2009, 50 west Indonesian time.
Manning.
Keeler.
and Newhouse.
The Costs of Poor Health Behaviours.
Harvard University Press.
Cambridge.
Mattsom.
Pollack.
and Cullen .
AuWhat are the odds that smoking will kill you?Ay American Journal of Public Health, 77.
Mullins.
, and Borland R.
AuHow bothered are people by environmental smoke?Ay Medical Journal of Australia, 160 .
, 585-6.
Nugrahani.
Radjiman.
Adawiyah, and Tabrany H.
AuThe Impact of Smoking to Annual Economic Consequences in Indonesia:
Cost of Treatment of Tobacco Related Diseases in Indonesia,Ay paper presented at 9th iHEA World Congress on Health Economics, 7th Ae 10th July 2013.
Sydney.
Peto.
Lopez.
Boreham.
Thun, and Heath Jr.
AuMortality from tobacco in developed countries: indirect estimation from national vital statistics,Ay Lancet, 339, 1268-1278.
Peto.
Lopez.
Boreham.
Thun, and Heath Jr.
AuMortality from smoking in developed countries 1950-2000: indirect estimation from national vital statistics,Ay Oxford University Press.
Oxford.
RAND Corporation .
Indonesian Family Life Survey .
ata fil.
, http://w.
org/labor/FLS/IFL html, accessed 20 January 2010, 00 west Indonesian time.
RAND Corporation .
Indonesian Family Life Survey .
ata fil.
, http://w.
org/labor/FLS/IFL html, accessed 20 January 2010, 00 west Indonesian time.
ECONOMIC JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 8.
April 2016, 1-12 Rivera.
, and Currais L.
AuEconomic Growth and Health: Direct Impact or Reverse Causation?Ay Applied Economics Letters, 6, 761764.
Ryan.
Zwerling.
and Orav O.
AuOccupational Risks associated with cigarette smoking: a prospective study,Ay American Journal of Public Health, 82, 29-32.
Shaw.
Yen.
and Yuan Y.
AuSelf-Assessed Health and Cigarette Smoking in China,Ay Far East and South Asia Meeting of the Econometric Society, https://editorialexpress.
com/cgibin/c onference/download.
cgi?db_name=FEM ES09&paper_id=774, accessed 18 June 2009, 14.
10 west Indonesian Stern.
AuMeasuring the Effect of Disability on Labour Force Partici- pation,Ay Journal of Human Resources, 24, 361-395.
Strauss.
, and Thomas.
AuHealth.
Nutrition, and Economic Development,Ay Journal of Economic Literature, xVI, 766-817 Witoelar.
Rukumnuaykit P.
and Strauss, .
AuSmoking Behaviour among Youth in a Developing Country: The Case of Indonesia,Ay Population Association of America 2006 Annual Meeting Program, http://paa2006.
edu/downl aspx? submissionId=60756, accessed 18 June 2009, 14.
30 west Indonesian time.
World Health Organization .
Global Adult Tobacco Survey: Indonesia Report http://w.
int/tobacco/surveill ance/survey/gats/indonesia_report.
df, accessed 21 January 2016.
vinces on Sumatra (North Sumatra.
West Sumatra.
South Sumatra, and Lampun.
, all provinces in Java (DKI Jakarta.
West Java.
Central Java.
DI Yogyakarta, and East Jav.
, and four provinces within the remaining main island groups (Bali.
West Nusa Tenggara.
South Kalimantan, and South Sulawes.
Data from IFLS that used in this study give information relating to health status .
sing both subjective and objective measuremen.
, wage rate, and other socioeconomic and demographic variables such as education level, age, type of main employment, work experience, total working hours in a week, marital status, smoking behaviour, and urban or rural residency.
This research will use panel data obtained from IFLS2 .
and IFLS3 .
and for individual level.
Econometric model The model that will be used is a modified human capital health model where an individualAos wage may be influenced by education level, type of employment, working experience, marital status, and several measures of health status and behaviours related to smoking.
Concerning the possibility of endogeneity in smoking behaviour, the two-step Heckman correction will be used to treat for sample selection bias.
This method involves a first stage probit equation estimate that explains the difference between smokers and non-smokers:
Smosd1ij = Zij vij = Aij vij Where Smosd1ij = 1 means that the individual is a smoker, and Smosd1ij = 0 means that the individual is a non-smoker.
Zij is a list of variables that explain an individualAos decision to smoke, which are marital status, gender, education, age, and region.
and vij is a normally distributed error From probit model estimation, the density function and cumulative density function of a standard normally distributed variable.
A(A) and AI(A), are able to be calculated.
The next step is to calculate HeckmanAos correction terms .
r invers Mills rati.
as follows IMR smoke A A (A ) / AI(A ) and IMR nonsmoke A A (A ) /.
A AI(A )} .
from the density function and distribution In the second step, the following wage equation is estimated by including the IMR .
nvers Mills rati.
separately for smokers and non-smokers:
Witj A X itjA A Z i j A A AIMRitj A uit where i indicates the individual being observed, t is the time period, and j is the individualAos choice of whether to smoke or not .
moker or non-smoke.
Wit is the natural log of average weekly wage.
Xit is a vector of health and socioeconomic variables such as health, education, type of employment, working experience, marital The impact of health status A (Wahyun.
status, and region .
rban or rura.
This vector is time-varying, while Zi is timeinvariant such as gender.
IMRit is the invers Mills ratio.
uit is the error term that satisfies the assumption of iid N.
, sAu.
Results and Discussion Descriptive statistics All data is obtained from the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS).
IFLS2 and IFLS3.
IFLS2 is based on survey done in 1997 and IFLS3 is based on survey done in Data is at the individual level, covering adults that reside in 13 different provinces in Indonesia.
The sample is taken using Stratified Random Sampling method.
The following paragraphs will explain each variable in detail .
ee Table .
Wage is obtained from the question AuApproximately what was your salary/wage during the last month?Ay.
The number is then divided by four to obtain average weekly Only individuals above 15 years of age are included.
The average wage is Rp 73,956.
92, while the minimum and maximum value are Rp 88,323.
93 and Rp 1,625,000 respectively.
Using a sample of 5463 individuals, the average total working hour per week is 92 hours, with the maximum value being 100 hours per week.
Data for this variable is obtained from the question AuNormally, what is the aproxymate total number of hours you work per week?Ay.
The average working hour in the sample is quite high, which is that each individual worked an average of between 8 to 9 hours per day.
The average work experience of individuals that are used in the sample is also high at 21 years.
Work experience variable is obtained from the survey by subtracting the individualAos birth year from the starting year of their first job.
The average length of schooling was 7.
56 years with a maximum of 24 years.
This may imply that all individuals in the sample have completed at least primary education, which is normally completed in 6 years.
The average age is 31 years with a minimum value of 15 years and a maximum value of 94 years.
This is consistent with the definition of Auadult individualsAy used in the sample.
Body Mass Index (BMI) represents health measurement.
It is calculated by dividing individual bodyweight in kilograms by height in squared meters.
The average BMI is 21.
BMI is generally divided into four categories.
fewer than18.
5 is low, 5 to 25 is normal, 25 up to 30 is above normal, and above 30 means that the individual is obese.
This study uses dummy variables for marital status, .
arried and unmarrie.
, gender .
ale and femal.
, job type .
ublic/government or private secto.
, and region .
rban or rura.
Smoking behaviour is also a dummy variable divided into those who have and have never smoked.
This variable is taken from the question "Have you had the behaviour of chewing tobacco,A?Ay.
Table 1: Descriptive Statistics of Sample Observation: 5463 individuals Variable Mean Average weekly wage 73,956.
Average weekly work44.
ing hours Working experience 17 .
Length of schooling 56 .
Age 67 .
Body Mass Index (BMI) Source: IFLS2 and IFLS3 Standard Deviation 88,323.
Minimum Maximum Value Value 500 .
13,28 92 .
43,47 ECONOMIC JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 8.
April 2016, 1-12 Estimation results The estimation is done in two steps.
The first step is estimating the probit model .
to obtain the density function and the distribution function, which are then used to calculate Heckman 's correction model .
nverse Mills rati.
The second step, after calculating the inverse Mills ratio (IMR), is to estimate the wage equation .
that includes the IMR Wage equation estimation is done separately between IMR of individuals who smoke and IMR of individuals who do not smoke to see the impact of each of the explanatory variables, namely health status and socioeconomic variables, on wage.
In Table 2, it is shown that marital status was not significant.
Hence the IMR is calculated using the estimation results of the probit equation in table 3.
Based on the IMR, the following tables (Table 4 and Table .
show the results from the wage equation estimation.
Wage equation estimation results indicate that the explanatory variables in the model have a significant relationship with wage, except for bmi1 and bmi4.
Bmi variables are divided into four categories, namely bmi1 for low, bmi2 for normal, bmi3 for high, and bmi4 for obese.
All relationships have the expected sign.
Average weekly working hours shows a significant positive correlation with wages at the 1 percent level for both smokers and non-smokers.
This means that an increase in average weekly working hour will increase average weekly wage for Indonesian workers.
For both smokers and nonsmokers, a 1-hour increase in weekly working hour will increase wage by about 1 percent, and the actual figure is smaller for smokers.
Likewise, work experience is also positively and significantly correlated with wage, but at a decreasing rate .
egative sign for workexps.
, as explained in the literature.
It is also similar with age, which is positively and significantly correlated with wage but at a decreasing rate.
This means that as age and work experience increase, so does wages.
However, after reaching a certain age .
, labor productivity decreases and consequently wage decreases too.
This is consistent with what is stated in Grossman's health production theory (Grossman, 1.
Individuals who work in the government/public sector have higher wages compared to individuals who work in the private sector.
For both smokers and nonsmokers, the difference according to the estimate above is about 50 percent.
This is possibly because individuals working in the government sector have a steadier stream of income.
Table 2: Probit Estimation Results Including All Explanatory Variables Dependent variable: Smoking behaviour Variable Coefficient Constant Marital status .
Gender .
Length of education .
Age .
Age2 .
Region .
Prob > chi2 Pseudo R2 Log likelihood Source: IFLS2 and IFLS3 *significant at 5 percent level.
**significant at 1 percent level Standard Error The impact of health status A (Wahyun.
Table 3: Probit Estimation Results Excluding Marital Status Dependent Variable: Smoking behaviour Variable Constant Gender .
Length of education .
Age .
Age2 .
Region .
Prob > chi2 Pseudo R2 Log likelihood Source: IFLS2 and IFLS 3 **significant at 1 percent level As for individuals who are married, they have a wage rate of approximately 10.
per cent higher compared with individuals who are not married, for both smokers and non-smokers.
A possible cause may be that companies tend to provide family benefits for employees that have spouses.
This relationship is in accordance with previous studies, namely Gray .
Loh .
, and Breush and Gray .
Coefficient Standard Error A higher level of education increases an individualAos wage.
This is indicated by the positive and significant relationship between length of education and wage at the 1 percent level.
Increasing one's level of education by 1 year will increase wage by 6 percent up to 6.
8 percent.
That is, the higher the person's level of education the higher the level of wage (Grossman and Kaestner, 1.
Table 4: Wage Equation Estimate for Smokers Dependent Variable: lnweeklywage Variable Coefficient Constant Total weekly working hours .
Working experience .
Working experience2 .
Job type .
Marital status .
Gender .
Length of education .
Age .
Age2 .
Region .
BMI1
BMI2
BMI3
BMI4
Smoker IMR (IMRsmoke.
Total observations R-squared Adj R-squared F( 15, 5.
Source: IFLS2 and IFLS 3 **significant at 1 percent level.
* signifikan pada tingkat 5 persen Standard Error ECONOMIC JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 8.
April 2016, 1-12 Table 5: Wage Equation Estimate for Non-Smokers Dependent Variable: lnweeklywage Variable Coefficient Constant Total weekly working hours .
Working experience .
Working experience2 .
Job type .
Marital status .
Gender .
Length of education .
Age .
Age2 .
Region .
BMI1
BMI2
BMI3
BMI4
Non-Smoker IMR (IMRnonsmoke.
Total observations R-squared Adj R-squared F( 15, 5.
Source: IFLS2 and IFLS 3 **significant at 1 percent level.
* signifikan pada tingkat 5 persen If we look at the differences in wage levels by region, then individuals who work in urban areas have a higher wage rate of about 27 percent compared to individuals who work in rural areas, smokers and nonsmokers alike.
The explanation for this finding is that generally jobs in urban areas are of a skilled nature, thus wages are higher compared to unskilled jobs that are normally found in rural areas.
The last explanation is for the health status variables.
These are the variables that are of particular concern in this Health status is represented by body mass index, which is one measure of anthropometrics.
Body Mass Index is calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by the person's height in squared meters.
Here.
BMI is divided into 4 categories.
Good health status is indicated by bmi2, which has a value between 18.
5 and 25 and is considered normal.
A BMI under this value is taken as poor health, however so is bmi4 which indicates obesity.
Based on the esti- Standard Error mates above, it is found that bmi2 .
and bmi3 .
bove norma.
is significantly positively related to wage levels.
This shows that good health status can improve productivity and ultimately lead to increased wage.
As for bmi4, which are individuals with obesity, the relationship with wage is negative.
Poor health will reduce productivity and consequently lower wage.
However, the results find no significant association.
Conclusion Using data from the Indonesian Family Life Survey, this study tried to look at the relationship between the level of wages in Indonesia with health status, socioeconomic variables, and smoking behavior by modifying the standard model of human capital of health where individual characteristics may affect earnings through the differences in the level of education, type of employment, work experience, marital status, and The impact of health status A (Wahyun.
several measures of health and behaviours relating to smoking.
With regard to problems with endogeneity in smoking choice, the two-step Heckman correction is used to overcome the problem of sample selection bias.
This involves a first stage probit estimation equation that shows the differences between individual smokers and nonsmokers, which is then followed by estimation of wage equation.
Based on the estimates, health status and all socioeconomic variables affect wages significantly and with the expected signs, for both smokers and nonsmokers.
Results of this study confirm the results of previous studies.
For example, health status variables are significantly and positively correlated with wage.
The second important thing found in this study is that the positive impact of health status variables and other socioeconomic factors on wages was lower for smokers than nonsmokers.
That is, wage increases are higher for individuals who are not smokers compared to those who are It is confirmed by health status that non-smokers have better productivity than smokers.
This is a note for individuals, the society and policy makers to be more concerned about health and smoking behavior, for example by promoting reduction in cigarette consumption in Indonesia.
However, we need to realize that wages are only one aspect of economic prosperity that can be affected by health Impact on total economic welfare may be higher if labor force participation is also in fact influenced by health status and economic well-being derived from a combination of wages and labor supply.
Thus, research on the relationship between health status and labor supply is an appealing future opportunity.
Furthermore, the problems of endogeneity and measurement error are a challenge on its own in the issue of health status and wages.
Therefore, research can be developed by using better methodology, for example by using panel method and including instrument variables to better control the problem of unobserved Another dimension is to test the impact of health status on the variance of wages or income, where a large variance in wages is associated with great uncertainty that has a negative impact on the welfare of individuals.
References Bloom.
, and Canning.
AuThe Health and Wealth of Nations.
Science,Ay 287.
, 1207-1209.
Badan Pusat Statistik, 2015.
Monthly Average Spending per Capita in Urban and Rural Areas by Goods Type .
ata http://bps.
id/linkTabelStatis/vie w/id/942, accessed 27th January 2016, 9.
00 west Indonesian time.
Bloom.
, and Mahal.
AuDoes the AIDS Epidemic Threaten Economic Growth in Africa,Ay Journal of Econometrics, 77, 105-124.
Bloom.
, and Sachs.
AuGeography.
Demography, and Economic Growth in Africa,Ay Brookings Papers on Economic Activities, 2, 207-295.
Bloom.
Canning.
and Sevilla.
AuEffect of Health on Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence,Ay NBER Working Paper No.
November.
Borland.
Chapman.
Owen.
Hill.
AuEffects of workplace bans on cigarette consumption,Ay American Journal of Public Health, 80, 178-180.
Bound.
Schoenbaum.
Stinebrickner, and T.
Waidmann .
AuThe Dynamic Effects of Health on the Labor Force Transitions of Old- ECONOMIC JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 8.
April 2016, 1-12 er Workers,Ay Labour Economics, 6.
Breusch.
and E.
Gray .
AuDoes Marriage Improve the Wages of Men and Women in Australia?Ay, paper presented at 12th Biennial Conference of the Australian Population Association.
September.
Canberra.
Australia.
Bush R.
, and Wooden.
AuSmoking and absence from work: Australian evidence,Ay Social Sciences and Medicine, 41, 437-46.
Cai.
AuEffect of Health on Wages of Australia Men,Ay Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series No.
2/07,
http://w.
wp/wp2007n02.
pdf, accessed 18 June 2009, 13.
00 west Indonesian Cai.
, and Kalb G.
AuHealth Status and Labour Force Participation:
Evidence from Australia,Ay Health Economics, 15, 241-261.
Campolieti.
AuDisability and the Labor Force Participation of Older Men in Canada,Ay Labour Economics, 9, 405-432.
Curry.
Grothaus.
McAfee.
Pabiniak.
AuUser and Cost Effectiveness of Smoking-Cessation Services under Four Insurance Plans in a Health Maintenance Organization,Ay The New England Journal of Medical, 339.
, 673-679.
Currie.
, and Madrian.
AuHealth.
Health Insurance and the Labor Market,Ay in O.
Ashenfelter and D.
Card .
Handbook of Labor Economics Vol.
3, 3310-3415.
Doll.
AuTobacco: an overview of health effects,Ay IARC Scientific Publications, 74, 11-22.
Evans.
Farrelly.
and Montgomery.
AuDo Workplace Smoking Bans Reduce Smoking,Ay American Economic Review.
Paper and Proceedings, 89.
, 729-747.
Gambin.
AuGender differences in the effect of health on wages in Britain,Ay ECuity i Working Paper No.
Gray.
AuThe Fall in MenAos Returns to Marriage: Declining Productivity Effect or Changing Selection,Ay Journal of Human Resources, 32 .
, 485-504.
Grossman.
, and Benham.
AuHealth.
Hours and Wages,Ay in Perlman.
M .
The Economics of Health and Medical Care, 205233.
Macmillan.
London.
Grossman.
, and Kaestner.
AuEffects of Education on Health,Ay in Brehman and N.
Stacey .
The Social Benefits of Education, 69-122.
University of Michigan Press.
Michigan.
Gruber.
AuYouth Smoking in the 1990Aos: Why Did It Rise and What Are the Long-run Implications?,Ay American Economic Review.
Papers and Proceedings, 91.
, 85Ae Hanaoka.
AuSmoking Participation among Japanese Men and Women,Ay PIE/CIS Discussion