LEARNING TO TEACH L2 PRONUNCIATION
VIA ONLINE AND BLENDED ON-CAMPUS COURSEWORK
Amanda Bakera.
Michael Burrib ( abaker@uow.
bmburri@uow.
University of Wollongong Northfields Ave.
Wollongong NSW 2522.
Australia Wenzhou-Kean University 88 Daxue Road.
Ouhai.
Wenzhou.
China, 325060 Abstract: This article focuses on the preparation of second language (L.
teachers in a Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) program offered in Australia.
Specifically, it explores the learning development of student teachers in learning how to teach English pronunciation pedagogy to L2 learners, either via online only or blended on-campus.
Thirteen student teachers .
ive asynchronous online-only and eight blended on-campu.
participated in the Data sources included: responses to online quizzes assessing student-teachersAo knowledge of English pronunciation.
their final assignments.
Moodle discussion forum postings.
Moodle participation analytics.
and narrative frames comprising participantsAo accounts of their personal experiences in learning course content.
Overall, findings indicated that the student teachersAo knowledge and understanding of how to teach L2 pronunciation was enhanced regardless of which mode of delivery they took.
Findings further showed that the Moodle books played a particularly important role for both groups of students in learning course content.
Keywords: blended learning, pronunciation pedagogy, qualitative research, second language teacher education, second language teacher knowledge DOI: http://dx.
org/10.
15639/teflinjournal.
v36i1/1-20 Pronunciation is typically viewed as the usage or misuse of segmentals .
onsonant and vowel However, pronunciation is more than this in second language (L.
It also includes the use of suprasegmentals, specifically stress, rhythm, and intonation.
Any one of these features may interfere with successful and intelligible .
communication, necessary in most aspects of everyday society.
Thus, not only may some L2 speakers have the same issues with speaking anxiety (Jee, 2.
that monolingual speakers have (Ledford et al.
, 2.
, but they may also experience issues related to unintelligible speech that may both exacerbate their speaking anxiety and interfere with getting their message across phonologically.
This often results in speakers with foreign accents being perceived as less competent .
Tely et al.
, 2.
and encountering racial discrimination .
McDonough et al.
, 2.
Nonetheless, there is a reluctance of teachers worldwide to teach pronunciation and/or give feedback on their L2 learnersAo pronunciation .
Baker, 2014.
Macdonald, 2.
This may be due to a variety of factors, including lack of training in phonology and/or pronunciation pedagogy .
Couper, 2017.
Murphy, 2.
, lack of confidence to teach pronunciation (Baker, 2 TEFLIN Journal.
Volume 36.
Number 1, 2025 Couper, 2017.
Foote et al.
, 2.
, and fears of imposing on the speakersAo identity (Macdonald, 2.
This is problematic because recent research has demonstrated the importance of intelligible speech to the learners .
Burri, 2023.
Dao, 2.
who value being understood when speaking in front of an audience or in other professional settings.
Many of these speakers desire to obtain a high level of clear pronunciation, even native-speaker pronunciation, despite modern advocacy de-prioritising such goals in L2 English classrooms (Thomson, 2.
Contemporary L2 teaching thus places great importance on intelligibility, seeking to support learners in putting forth their ideas and arguments successfully by focusing on speaking clearly.
These issues highlight a need for teachers who can support their L2 students to address pronunciation challenges they face.
Teachers need to know how to integrate pronunciation instruction into their lessons and understand Auhow English pronunciation is structured, why it is so varied, and how it changes depending on discourse contextAy (Reed & Levis, 2015, p.
Taken together, this constitutes highly technical linguistic knowledge that teachers need to both understand conceptually and apply in practice.
This enables them, first, to identify which specific features of pronunciation L2 learners may be using inappropriately, and then to help learners make the necessary changes to improve their overall intelligibility.
Simply speaking, teachers require both subject matter content knowledge .
and pedagogical content knowledge .
ow to teach pronunciatio.
(Baker & Murphy, 2.
Both areas subsume vast amounts of knowledge, each easily necessitating a standalone course .
, a phonetics course in an English linguistics progra.
Rarely, though, if ever, can TESOL programs devote more than a single course to this overarching topic area.
Despite its importance and the clear need for pronunciation teaching, relatively few L2 teacher education programs have courses devoted to pronunciation (Murphy, 2.
As a result, there is a notable dearth of research into pronunciation pedagogy training within L2 teacher education programs, even though emerging research has clearly demonstrated that pronunciation teacher preparation can be adequate (Burri, 2015.
Burri.
Baker, et al.
, 2017.
Burri.
Chen, et al.
Golombek & Jordan, 2.
How to provide such training to a wide variety of different types of L2 educators .
English as a second language.
English as a foreign language.
English as an international language, etc.
) is a key question to consider in todayAos globalized world.
Given the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and uncertainties in providing quality education, it has become necessary for training to be provided flexibly in both online and faceto-face formats to address the needs of teachers and/or students who may need to teach and/or study from home, from afar, or in person as per their individual situations.
Blended learning can address these needs.
Blended learning involves the innovative integration of both online and face-to-face educational experiences.
Garrison and Kanuka .
explain that:
Blended learning is both simple and complex.
At its simplest, blended learning is the thoughtful integration of classroom face-to-face learning experiences with online learning experiences.
There is considerable intuitive appeal to the concept of integrating the strengths of synchronous .
ace-tofac.
and asynchronous .
ext-based Interne.
learning activities.
At the same time, there is considerable complexity in its implementation, with the challenge of virtually limitless design possibilities and applicability to so many contexts.
Baker & Burri.
Learning to Teach L2 Pronunciation Such learning is deemed potentially more powerful as the mixed learning environment can offer additional opportunities to engage students, or in the case of the present studyAos student teachers, in their learning endeavours (Delialioglu, 2.
Self-discipline and effective time management skills are essential in online and blended learning situations (Tang & Chaw, 2.
however, as students become more experienced in online environments, their potential for success increases substantially (Napier et al.
, 2.
Furthermore, positive interactions with the teacher are important in both online and blended learning environments (Hong, 2002.
Hung & Chou, 2.
, with access to the teacher signifying an important predictor of student satisfaction in blended learning (Martynez-Caro & Campuzano-Bolaryn, 2011.
te Pas et al.
, 2.
Students also appreciate how additional online learning opportunities can reinforce face-to-face classroom learning (Banditvilai, 2.
Research by Wang et al.
has further shown that videos provided with the instructorAos image are more likely to enhance studentsAo learning of course content for declarative knowledge .
nowledge of a particular topi.
, but not for procedural knowledge .
nowledge of how to teach somethin.
Their study found that adding the instructorAos image to the latter significantly increases the learner's cognitive load .
, the amount of mental effort require.
In English language teaching (ELT), blended learning has been a hot topic for at least two decades (Sharma, 2.
While many of the advantages and issues discussed in the previous section also apply to ELT, research has revealed challenges and drawbacks that are particularly relevant to English language teachers working in blended learning contexts and, hence, to the focus of this study.
StudentsAo cultural background, for example, can impact their learning.
is, students from collective cultures, such as, for example.
Japan or China, may find independent learning that is required before coming to class challenging (Gayatri et al.
, 2.
Some may be reluctant to engage in online discussions due to fear of making mistakes (Zhu et al, 2.
, whereas others may feel isolated and thus lack motivation to engage in their studies (Fu, 2.
Constant accessibility of social media sites can also be a source of considerable distraction to some students in blended learning environments (Hamdan et al.
, 2.
Research has further shown that unreliable internet connections, technical problems, perceived increases in workload for both teachers and students, teachersAo and studentsAo limited computer literacy, perceived difficulties in following instructions, and teachersAo lack of training, knowledge, and skills in the design and delivery of blended learning courses can all shape and even limit the effectiveness of teaching and learning in a blended environment (Fu, 2022.
Gayatri et al, 2022.
Majeed & Dar.
Maintaining an appropriate balance between face-to-face and asynchronous online activities is essential in maximising the effectiveness of blended learning (Gayatri et al.
, 2022.
Sheerah, 2.
While these are important issues for L2 teacher educators to consider, explorations into blended learning offered to prepare teachers to teach pronunciation are essentially non-existent.
Only one study has focused on online and blended learning in L2 oral communication teacher Baker .
, in an investigation of a graduate-level course she taught on L2 oral communication and pedagogy, explored her reflective practices as a teacher educator as she redeveloped the course.
Drawing on student survey data and peer observations of her practice, several suggestions for enhancing both course delivery and student engagement were determined, especially in further developing studentsAo capacity for achieving higher levels of 4 TEFLIN Journal.
Volume 36.
Number 1, 2025 critical thinking.
While these findings are promising, research is needed to investigate teacher preparation more closely concerning pronunciation.
Insights from such inquiry would enhance our understanding of learning dynamics in a blended L2 teacher education context.
This is particularly relevant given that, with the pandemic, teacher training has increasingly moved to an online and asynchronous format, making adequate preparation of L2 teachers challenging.
The present study, therefore, addresses a significant problem and makes an important contribution by providing novel insights into the process of student teachersAo learning how to teach L2 English pronunciation (HTEP) via either online or blended on-campus modes of Specifically, it examines the case of a group of graduate-level .
MasterAo.
student teachers enrolled in either the on-campus or distance TESOL program at an Australian This study examines the development of student teachersAo knowledge and skills of HTEP as supported, partly or entirely, via a Moodle delivery system.
As part of the investigation, this study looks at the student teachersAo learning of HTEP to better help L2 learners achieve intelligible speech, in relation to studying solely online or via blended on-campus delivery.
The research questions thus posed are:
To what extent does a course on L2 pronunciation pedagogy, whether conducted solely online or via blended on-campus delivery, enhance student teachersAo learning of HTEP? What are student teachersAo perceptions of their learning of HTEP through taking the course? METHOD The objective of this study was to obtain an in-depth understanding of student teachersAo learning, including their knowledge and understanding of HTEP through asynchronous onlineonly and blended on-campus coursework in a course on L2 English pronunciation pedagogy.
achieve this aim, online quizzes, final assignments, student teachersAo Moodle postings.
Moodle analytics, and narrative frames were collected and triangulated.
Participants All students enrolled in the L2 English pronunciation pedagogy course at the graduate level Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) program offered at the researchersAo university in Australia were approached via email to request their participation in this study.
They were provided with a Participant Information Sheet and an Informed Consent form.
Volunteers to participate in the study were recruited at the end of the course, following the release of the studentsAo final grades.
The reason for this timing was considered to be in the best interest of the students.
As explained in our research ethics application to the universityAos Human Research Ethics Committee, students may feel that participation or non-participation in the research study could adversely affect their grades.
thus, to mitigate this potential concern, we asked students to participate only after they had already received their final grades for the course.
Students who volunteered to participate returned their signed informed consent form via email.
In total, 13 students volunteered to participate in the study: five students in the distance (DIS) and eight in the on-campus (OC) program.
Table 1 provides demographic information on students in each program, including their gender, first language (L.
, years of experience Baker & Burri.
Learning to Teach L2 Pronunciation teaching English as a Second (ESL) or Foreign (EFL) language, years of experience teaching pronunciation specifically, and the type of program in which they taught prior to their graduate studies, including location.
All names are pseudonyms.
The second author taught the DIS students in an asynchronous online-only format .
Moodle books, asynchronous online discussion forums, and, when needed, via emai.
The OC students were taught by the first author in a blended on-campus format which primarily involved weekly three-hour face-to-face lectures/workshops.
however, the OC students also had access to the same asynchronous Moodle content/forum utilised by the DIS students and were welcome to interact and participate with the content/forum as well.
As such, both cohorts accessed the same asynchronous Moodle resources over 11 weeks.
The Moodle content was the primary mode of course delivery for DIS students, whereas for OC students it served as a supplement to their face-to-face classes .
lecture/workshop.
taught on campus.
Table 1.
Participants Program
Name
Gender
Years of Teaching ESL/ EFL
Years of Teaching Pronunciation Diego Spanish
Jose
Spanish
Lili
Mongolian Katie English
Sophie English
Mai
Vietnamese AuLittleAy Risa
Japanese Shota
Japanese DIS
DIS
DIS
DIS
Jessica
Zoe
Jason
Adele
English
English
English
Hebrew
DIS
Tanya English Almost none Program Type Program Location N/A Colombia (Army office.
N/A Colombia (Army office.
N/A (University China
N/A
Australia (Paren.
English for Australia Education Vietnam Counsellor English School Japan Teacher Junior High English Japan Teacher ESL teacher Australia ESL teacher Australia EFL teacher Japan ESL teacher Australia Primary school Australia 6 TEFLIN Journal.
Volume 36.
Number 1, 2025 Instructional Design The Moodle platform consisted of a series of weekly AuMoodle booksAy.
A AuMoodle bookAy, as designated by the course management system known as Moodle, is a type of e-book that provides a set of learning materials organised in a series of online AupagesAy.
In this course, these Moodle books integrate both text-based and audio/video material, along with, depending on the focus of the module, video analyses of learner speech.
The following weekly modules/Moodle books included:
Historical & Current Perspectives .
n teaching pronunciatio.
Consonants Vowels Ae Part 1 Vowels Ae Part 2 Syllables & Word Stress Thought Groups.
Sentence Stress & Rhythm Intonation Connected Speech & Identifying Priorities Taxonomy of Techniques Fluency Development & Integrating Pronunciation Pronunciation & Spelling The general format of most Moodle books above included the following information:
C Introduction C Main Content .
eries of pages with videos, audio mini-lectures, text-based discussion of content, and images such as face diagrams for consonantal sound production.
C Knowledge about the target feature.
of pronunciation .
, syllables and word stres.
C Knowledge about how to teach the target feature of pronunciation .
, using an elastic band to teach syllables and word stres.
C Speech Analysis .
ncluding video demos of the second author conducting a live analysis of L2 learner speec.
, practice listening to L2 speech and identifying issues related to word or sentence stres.
For most modules .
n the Moodle books and in the OC lectures/workshop.
, the HTEP content focused on a practical approach to teaching pronunciation that included an introduction to a wide variety of multi-sensory techniques .
Acton.
Baker, et al.
, 2013.
Baker, 2014.
Burri et al.
, 2019.
Celce-Murcia et al.
, 2010.
Gilbert, 2.
deemed appropriate for teaching specific features of English pronunciation.
Students could post questions and reflective thoughts at any time on any content presented in the Moodle books on the main discussion forum on the Moodle site throughout the semester.
In weeks 1-8 of the course semester, the students completed a series of four online Moodle quizzes to assess their knowledge of targeted pronunciation features.
Every fortnight, students completed one of these open-book quizzes to evaluate their learning of two weeks of course content.
Each quiz consisted of multiple-choice items and two open-ended Throughout the semester, students also participated in an optional asynchronous online discussion forum where they could ask questions and provide helpful tips and other Baker & Burri.
Learning to Teach L2 Pronunciation discoveries/information to their peers.
Finally, students had to complete a final 4,000-word assignment where they interviewed an L2 learner of English who had noticeable issues with their English pronunciation which had a negative impact on their intelligibility .
s deemed by the interviewer-student but double-checked by one of the researchers via online submission to the Moodle platform before the students commenced their analysis of the learnerAos speec.
Their interview involved .
read speech Ae a diagnostic story provided by the authors, and .
free speech Ae an unrehearsed story or recount of an event from the intervieweeAos past.
The students then analysed this speech for segmental and suprasegmental features of pronunciation deemed difficult to understand based on the target features from weeks 2-8 of the course.
They completed a diagnostic chart indicating problematic features of examples from the transcripts they analysed.
Following the analysis, the student teachers had to make pedagogical recommendations for improving the learnersAo pronunciation to enhance their intelligibility.
Data Sources In line with typical ways of determining student teachersAo learning of course content and eliciting feedback on their learning process (Baker, 2.
, the following data were collected: .
results/responses to four online quizzes assessing their knowledge of English pronunciation plus their grades on these quizzes.
the studentsAo final assignment.
Moodle discussion forum postings .
he contributions of each participant were downloaded into a single Word file from the Moodle sit.
Moodle participation analytics.
narrative frames (Barkhuizen, 2.
comprising participantsAo accounts of their personal experiences in learning course content.
Following previous research on learning to teach English pronunciation (Burri & Baker, 2.
, narrative frames were used to elicit the student teachersAo perceptions of the course content in developing their learning of HTEP.
Narrative frames are Auwritten story template.
consisting of a series of incomplete sentences and blank spaces of varying lengthsAy.
they are Au.
tructured as a story in skeletal formAy with the Au.
imA to produce a coherent story by filling in the spaces according to writersAo experiences and reflections on theseAy (Barkhuizen, 2015, p.
Data Analysis The data analysis was conducted using a multi-pronged approach, which included: Moodle analysis of assessment task marks and final course grades.
and a thematic analysis of qualitative data .
arrative frame questionnaire data.
Moodle posts by students, and qualitative responses on online quizze.
First.
Moodle analytics were employed to determine to what extent OC and DIS students accessed the Moodle book content.
Details were provided for: .
Number of Moodle discussion forum posts made by each student.
number of times students accessed pages in the Moodle books .
otal page view.
number of weekly Moodle books they accessed throughout the semester .
otal book view.
These were subsequently compared with diverse factors .
, studentsAo teaching experience/teaching contex.
to gain insights into the student teachersAo learning of HTEP.
Second, the studentsAo final grades for the course, the marks for the segmental and suprasegmental components of their final assignments, and the marks for the four quizzes were all examined.
These were also compared with diverse factors .
, studentsAo teaching 8 TEFLIN Journal.
Volume 36.
Number 1, 2025 experience/teaching contex.
that might impact the student teachersAo knowledge and understanding of HTEP.
Finally, qualitative data analysis included an inductive thematic analysis of the narrative frames, discussion forum postings .
ee Appendi.
, responses to open-ended quiz items, and the reflective section of the studentsAo final assignments.
This analysis was done to explore further the student teachersAo understanding of pronunciation features and HTEP.
Here, the data were examined to determine which aspects of the course content and/or delivery students required additional clarifications and advice, or, in the case of the Moodle forums, where they shared their personal experiences/understanding of content to support their peers in learning content.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
Findings This section will first examine the overall professional learning of the 13 DIS and OC students based on the analysis of assignment marks, final course grades, and Moodle analytics.
Then it will explore the study participantsAo perceptions of their professional learning.
Student TeachersAo Learning of HTEP The analysis of the studentsAo performance in the four quizzes in the first half of the semester indicates that the students achieved a strong overall level of knowledge of pronunciation and understanding of HTEP.
Each quiz was scored out of 15 marks, with the average score of each cohort (OC and DIS) being provided in Table 2.
The table shows that the eight OC students achieved marks only slightly higher than the five in the DIS group.
Notably, both groups struggled the most with Quiz 4, which focused on intonation and connected speech for L2 Table 2.
Knowledge of Pronunciation: OC vs DIS Participant Group (# of OC .
DIS .
Combined .
Quiz 1: Historical/ Current Perspectives & Consonants .
Quiz 2:
Vowels .
Quiz 3:
Syllables.
Stress.
Thought Groups & Rhythm .
Quiz 4: Intonation.
Connected Speech & Identifying Priorities .
Total Quiz Score .
(Note: Average Student Marks on Quizzes Scored out of 15 & Percentage of Overall Accurac.
Student responses to the open-ended item on Quiz 4 revealed additional insights into what content the student teachers found most challenging to learn from Modules 7 and 8.
Specifically, they indicated the following features to be the most challenging: Intonation .
ll 13 student.
Baker & Burri.
Learning to Teach L2 Pronunciation Connected speech .
DIS student.
and Relative functional load .
DIS studen.
Shota One of the most challenging things to learn is intonation because I lack knowledge.
In the class.
I could not differentiate between varieties of tones, such as fall and rise.
However, thanks to practicing it.
I am getting used to it.
And Jason added that:
Identifying pitch contour and intonation patterns is definitely the most difficult thing for me.
I really like connected speech, but some of the terminology is difficult for me.
But determining rising or falling intonation has always been difficult for me.
I guess I am good at using it because I like to think I express my feelings well in English, but I am not good at labelling it.
I need to go over my project 1000 times I think! In the second part of the semester, students completed their 4000-word final assignment .
ee description abov.
Each of the segmental and suprasegmental analyses was marked holistically on a four-point scale: Not achieved = 0 marks.
Achieved = 1 point.
Achieved quite well = 2 points.
Achieved to a high degree = 3 points.
The theoretical discussion and pedagogical plan to discuss what instructional techniques they would employ to support the speaker in enhancing their production of the problematic features was scored out of 100 points.
As demonstrated in Table 3, student teachers in both the OC and DIS cohorts performed similarly in their analyses, with both cohorts achieving an average score of 2 out of 3 for their segmental analyses and 2.
34 (OC) and 2.
4 (DIS) for their suprasegmental analyses.
Yet, the DIS students performed better on their overall final assignments, achieving an average of 82.
overall, whereas the OC cohort achieved 73.
Looking across all the assessment tasks, it is important to note, however, that both groups received higher marks in their suprasegmental analyses, thus indicating that they had enhanced their understanding and knowledge of these features since taking Quiz 4 in the first half of the semester.
Nonetheless, in the reflection section of the final assignment, two students commented on their ongoing difficulties with intonation.
Adele explained that AuIt has been a challenging unit.
I was particularly confused by the concept of pitch and intonation.
I found it difficult to analyse .
y intervieweeAo.
speech items.
They sounded different every time I listened to them!Ay Jose also noted that:
This project involved a challenging topic: intonation.
This theme was confusing because different patterns made it difficult to understand.
However, the in-depth analysis of the intonation of the target individual speaking, the reading of extensive scholarly literature, and the explanations given by the course lecturers facilitated a clear understanding of this topic.
Table 3.
Pedagogical Assignment: OC vs DIS Participant Group (# of participant.
OC .
DIS .
Segmental Analysis (Average Scor.
Suprasegmental Analysis (Average Scor.
Note: some DIS students indicated more than one feature.
Final Assignment Mark (Average Scor.
10 TEFLIN Journal.
Volume 36.
Number 1, 2025 Participant Group Segmental Analysis Suprasegmental Analysis Final Assignment Mark (# of participant.
(Average Scor.
(Average Scor.
(Average Scor.
Combined .
(Note: Average Student Marks on Segmental and Suprasegmental analyses, each scored holistically out plus final assignment mark scored out of .
While the data derived from the four quizzes and final assignments showed that the student teachersAo learning of HTEP progressed during the graduate pronunciation pedagogy course, the results also support previous research that intonation often poses difficulties for student teachers, irrespective of their teaching, linguistic, and cultural background (Burri.
Baker, & Chen, 2.
Interestingly, however, the thematic analysis of the studentsAo posts in the Moodle forum .
ee Appendi.
rarely involved clarifications about intonation-related content or analysis .
nly one most requests for clarification focused instead on issues related to sentence-level stress .
In addition to the quiz scores and final assignment marks.
Moodle analytics and student teachersAo final grades provided further insights into participantsAo learning.
Results obtained from the Moodle analytics are presented alongside their final grade for the course in Table 4.
depicted in the table.
OC students who accessed the Moodle books the least .
otably Lili and Kati.
, in conjunction with their weekly OC .
ace-to-fac.
classes, achieved the lowest final grades in the graduate course.
However, in the case of the DIS students, the lowest achieving student.
Zoe, accessed all the Moodle books and viewed their pages more times than, for example.
Jason and Jessica, but still received a lower result than those two DIS student teachers.
Table 4.
Moodle Participation Analytics vs Final Mark
Program
DIS
DIS
DIS
DIS
DIS
Participant Lili Katie Diego Jose Risa Sophie Shota Mai Zoe Adele Jason Tanya Jessica Forum Posts Total Page Views Total Book Views Final Grade A closer examination of ZoeAos final assignment revealed greater insight into why she received a lower grade than others despite what appeared to be a reasonably high level of Baker & Burri.
Learning to Teach L2 Pronunciation 11 engagement with the Moodle content.
In Zoe's feedback, the second author highlighted the lack of adherence to the model provided in the speech analysis videos, leading to missed pronunciation issues.
Thus, despite what appeared to be enhanced engagement with the Moodle material.
ZoeAos engagement was superficial, failing to watch the video demonstrations of the analyses closely and following the model provided.
Overall, the Moodle analytics and the analysis of the studentsAo task marks and final grades revealed that the online and blended on-campus course effectively supported both DIS and OC students in enhancing their knowledge and understanding of HTEP.
Most students .
t least those who chose to participate in the stud.
received final grades of 81% or higher.
Those who received lower marks engaged with less than half the Moodle book content (Lili & Kati.
or failed to engage deeply with the material (Zo.
Student TeachersAo Perception of Learning of HTEP Thematic analyses of the narrative frames revealed that both the OC and DIS student teachers felt that the Moodle books played an important role in supporting their learning of HTEP.
These findings align with the results of our analysis of the Moodle analytics, task marks, and final grades above.
In this vein, the most prominent points the student teachers made .
long with the number of participants who raised these point.
useful/helpful .
comprehensive/excellent source of knowledge .
engaging/stimulating .
well-organised/designed .
good for reviewing .
made content easy to understand .
supported learning .
Participants expanded on these points and provided several illustrative examples in their narrative frames.
Zoe, for instance, wrote .
rompts from the narrative frames in italic.
I felt the weekly Moodle books were very comprehensive, useful and well organised.
As it is very challenging to study online without face-to-face interaction we need good online resources which the Moodle books provided.
The variety of images, clips, videos etc was excellent.
I also liked the little comics.
The advantage.
of the Moodle books .
ith their written content, images/diagrams, brief audio lecture clips, various video and/or youtube clips and videos of speech analyse.
was visually pleasing and the audio clips of the assignment requirements was very helpful because the assignment was so massive, we needed all the examples, templates and support we could get.
Similarly.
Jessica expressed that:
I felt the weekly Moodle books were always stimulating to read, never boring and they made learning a joy.
I looked forward to reading them each week and I particularly liked the addition of humour into the lessons .
ot a common thing in tertiary stud.
and the connection to the everyday Ae movies, comics, etc.
Learning .
t any tim.
needs to have a AofunAo element and I think this is underestimated by many lecturers.
The advantage.
of the Moodle books .
ith their written content, 12 TEFLIN Journal.
Volume 36.
Number 1, 2025 images/diagrams, brief audio lecture clips, various video and/or youtube clips and videos of speech analyse.
was that they provided a limited amount of content that could be absorbed without getting Furthermore.
Sohpie explained that:
I felt the weekly Moodle books were an excellent source of knowledge and referral, especially the audio files, which were especially beneficial due to the fact, that I could listen to them many times at my convenience, was a huge help.
The advantage.
of the Moodle books .
ith their written content, images/diagrams, brief audio lecture clips, various video and/or YouTube clips and videos of speech analyse.
was brilliant! As noted previously.
I was able to access them as often as required to reaffirm new knowledge.
Using Moodle for this subject proved to be absolutely essential and itAos really the only subject thus far where I accessed Moodle regularly as an on-campus student.
Although the opinions expressed by student teachers were largely positive, they also raised a few concerns.
For the most part, however, these concerns were individualised, with only one student commenting on any point.
Perceived drawbacks of the Moodle books named by participants included:
Too much information and new technical language .
DIS) Desire for more self-testing instruments .
DIS) Difficulty understanding some of the practical techniques without demonstration .
DIS) Automatic logouts .
OC) Difficult to print out due to formatting .
OC) Issues with downloading the whole Moodle book .
oesnAot include video/audio conten.
OC) Regarding the first point about the Moodle books containing too much information.
Zoe explained that:
The disadvantage.
of the Moodle books was too much information for me.
I printed all the Moodle books to study and it was very stressful to try and read and comprehend and keep up with everything.
There was a lot of new terminology and technical language.
I found it very hard doing it online in this sense.
Despite these perceived disadvantages, most student teachers appeared to be satisfied with the content provided, irrespective of whether they were in the OC or DIS group.
When asked what they felt were the disadvantages of the Moodle books, six of the 13 student teachers stated.
AuNone.
Ay Tanya mentioned.
AuI found no disadvantage of the Moodle books as they were well planned out and supported by my lecturer.
Ay Discussion Overall, the results of this study demonstrated that the participantsAo knowledge and understanding of HTEP developed notably during the pronunciation pedagogy course, irrespective of whether the student teachers were enrolled in the blended on-campus (OC) or online-only (DIS) version.
The combined results taken from comparative analyses of the student teachersAo quiz scores throughout the semester, performance in the suprasegmental and segmental Baker & Burri.
Learning to Teach L2 Pronunciation 13 analyses, final assignment marks.
Moodle analytics, complete with final grades coupled with the thematic analyses of the narrative frames eliciting the viewpoints of the students clearly showed the success of the course in developing the student teachersAo HTEP.
Specifically designed to develop student teachersAo knowledge of English pronunciation and how to teach it to L2 learners, the Moodle books played a significant role in their learning.
Whether OC students used the Moodle books to supplement or revise the content of their weekly three-hour face-to-face classes, or DIS students who learned solely from these materials, the Moodle books supported studentsAo learning of course content.
As noted earlier, aside from a single study focusing on online and blended learning in more general L2 oral communication (Baker, 2.
, this is the first study to examine L2 pronunciation teacher learning in this particular setting.
Such an exploration is needed given the important role of pronunciation in achieving successful oral communication (Baker, 2021.
Celce-Murcia et al.
, 2010.
Darcy, 2.
and the prevalence of online teaching since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
As the present study showed, the development of comprehensive Moodle books supports the learning of HTEP for both DIS and OC students.
Student teachersAo academic achievements further evidenced their learning of HTEP.
revealed by the final assignment scores and final course marks, both DIS and OC student teachersAo learning, regardless of years of teaching experience or language background, enhanced their knowledge and understanding of HTEP during the blended course.
Individual assignment and quiz marks, plus final course grades for both groups, were similar, although the OC cohort had a slightly lower average overall.
Nonetheless, the analysis of the narrative frames revealed that both OC and DIS student teachers felt sufficiently supported to succeed in their studies, and neither group felt disadvantaged.
Furthermore, their final grades suggested that most student teachers understood HTEP well.
however, quiz marks showed slightly lower results for Quiz 4 (Intonation and Connected Speec.
, especially for the DIS student teachers.
This aligns with the participantsAo reported perceptions about the difficulty of learning intonation.
For L2 teacher educators, the participantsAo challenges with intonation might be concerning given not only the substantial communicative value that intonation and other suprasegmentals features have in speech (Brazil, 1997.
Kang et al.
, 2.
, but that previous research has also reported similar difficulties teachers have with teaching intonation (Baker, 2011.
Couper, 2.
However, this concern might not be warranted, as by the end of the semester, both OC and DIS groups achieved higher average scores in the suprasegmental analysis than in the segmental analysis in the final This demonstrated improved performance since their quiz four scores, and thus an enhanced understanding of English intonation and how to apply that newly gained understanding to identify problematic intonation use in L2 learner speech.
All of the combined data, consisting of both student teacher-generated products .
plus their perceptions of how well they understood course content .
nline Moodle forums and narrative frame.
, helped us determine the effectiveness of the blended on-campus and online course for both the OC and DIS students in learning HTEP.
Two comments by students in their final assignment reflections represent their thoughts about the value of their learning in a blended on-campus and online graduate course.
Tanya from the DIS cohort wrote:
AuThis .
nd this project in particula.
has been immensely challenging but also one of 14 TEFLIN Journal.
Volume 36.
Number 1, 2025 the most enlightening .
in the entire .
Ay.
Similarly.
Sophie from the OC cohort I have been fascinated and surprised by how much there is to know about this discipline and canAot help but wonder why this is not a compulsory .
[A] The fact that I can speak with a AodevelopingAo confidence and experiment with techniques and explanations, has been a highly beneficial and extremely worthwhile subject area to undertake.
CONCLUSION
This study has demonstrated the effectiveness of a dual model of online only and on-campus blended learning to enhance student teachersAo knowledge and understanding of how to teach pronunciation, especially at the postgraduate level.
As research has shown, teachers may be reluctant to teach pronunciation due to insufficient pedagogical training or confidence .
Baker, 2014.
Couper, 2.
and therefore online Moodle books, used as a supplement to oncampus learning or to serve as the backbone of online-only learning, may help to address the Moodle books may be invaluable to students, especially when they incorporate, for example, video footage of the application of pronunciation teaching techniques and the course instructor conducting segmental and suprasegmental analyses of L2 learner speech and explaining these analyses.
Students can subsequently watch and re-watch as needed.
The more practice student teachers have with analysing L2 learner speech, the more confident and less reluctant they will be to address pronunciation in the L2 classroom.
Another advantage of the Moodle books is they help L2 teacher education programs to address the need to deliver courses in multiple formats, including on-campus only, blended on-campus, asynchronous online only .
ith a discussion forum such as that used in the current stud.
and even synchronous online only .
ncorporating live tutorials via Zoom of similar technology as we now use in subsequent offerings of this cours.
Multiple delivery modes provide greater access to an increasingly more diverse student teacher population who may need enhanced support with their studies or cannot always commit to study using more traditional face-to-face methods.
We acknowledge that the relatively small number and diversity of participants limit the potential generalisability of the studyAos findings.
Most of our OC group had little to no pronunciation-specific teaching experience, whereas the DIS group had considerable expertise.
However, this is the reality of graduate-level education in our Australian context.
We need to provide an educational experience in HTEP to a wide range of students from diverse language backgrounds and teaching experiences.
The Moodle books help us to meet the needs of such a diverse cohort.
Furthermore, having this flexibility is critically important in a world that, at any time, may require a sudden shift to online-only learning .
, when faced with a pandemi.
REFERENCES