Nurse Media Journal of Nursing e-ISSN: 2406-8799, p-ISSN: 2087-7811 https://medianers.undip.ac.id 13(3):263-273, December 2023 https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v13i3.54738 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Determinants of Physical and Mental Healthrelated Quality of Life among Patients with Breast Cancer During COVID-19 Pandemic Mohd Jamil1, Leni Merdawati2, Boby Febri Krisdianto2, Daan Khambri3, Wirsma Arif Harahap3, Hidayat Arifin4,5 1Department of Community Health and Family Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia 2Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia 3Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia 4School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan 5Department of Basic Nursing Care, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia Article Info Abstract Article History: Received: 27 May 2023 Revised: 24 December 2023 Accepted: 25 December 2023 Online: 31 December 2023 Keywords: Anxiety; breast cancer; COVID-19; depression; quality of life Corresponding Author: Leni Merdawati Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia Email: lenimerdawati@nrs.unand.ac.id Background: The concern surrounding the physical and mental health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with breast cancer emerged during COVID19. However, there is a lack of sufficient studies that have specifically addressed this issue. It is crucial to emphasize the evaluation of this aspect as it significantly impacts the enhancement of future physical and mental HRQoL for these patients. Purpose: This study investigated the determinants of physical and mental HRQoL among patients with breast cancer during COVID-19. Methods: In a cross-sectional study conducted between September and October 2022, participation involved 260 patients diagnosed with breast cancer, selected through convenience sampling. Our observation focused on assessing the outcomes of physical and mental HRQoL using the Short Form (SF-12) questionnaire for data collection. Additionally, the data underwent analysis via binary logistic regression. Results: Respondents aged <50 years (p=0.010; aOR=2.08; 95% CI=1.18–3.67), unemployed (p=0.022; aOR=2.29; 95% CI=1.16–4.53), and had high depression (p=0.026; aOR=2.41; 95% CI=1.13–5.12) have a more likelihood to have low physical HRQoL. In addition, unemployed respondents (p=<0.001; aOR=4.15; 95% CI=2.14–8.04) and had high anxiety (p=0.004; aOR=2.71; 95% CI=1.38–5.33) have more likelihood to have low mental HRQoL. Conclusion: In this study, it was found that anxiety, depression, and unemployed respondents were associated with a higher likelihood of experiencing lower physical and mental HRQoL. Nurses and healthcare workers should prioritize addressing psychological issues such as anxiety and depression among breast cancer patients, emphasizing the necessity for interventions aimed at alleviating these concerns. How to cite: Jamil, M., Merdawati, L., Krisdianto, B. F., Khambri, D., Harahap, W. A., & Arifin, H. (2023). Determinants of physical and mental health-related quality of life among patients with breast cancer during COVID19 pandemic. Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 13(3), 263-273. https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v13i3.54738 1. Introduction Acute respiratory distress syndrome is an outbreak of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). The outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic that began in December 2019 had a moderately severe impact and became the most critical and widespread pandemic of this century (Huang et al., 2020). COVID-19 spreads rapidly in the larger community, including patients with a clinical presentation of acute respiratory distress syndrome, and causes high morbidity and mortality (Hasan et al., 2020). The condition of COVID-19 leads to fear and anxiety that impact physical and mental health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (Shafran et al., 2021). Physical and mental health are integral components of an individual’s overall quality of life. Physical health encompasses the state of the body, including aspects such as fitness, freedom from illness, mobility, and the ability to perform daily tasks without hindrance. On the other hand, mental health encompasses emotional, psychological, and cognitive well-being, influencing factors like emotional stability, coping mechanisms, interpersonal relationships, and adaptability to life’s challenges. Both physical and mental health play pivotal roles in determining an individual’s well-being and ability to lead a fulfilling and satisfying life (Folsom et al., 2009). Copyright © 2023, NMJN, e-ISSN 2406-8799, p-ISSN 2087-7811 Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 13(3), 2023, 264 Breast cancer patients experience immunosuppression caused by cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy and other therapies. Decreased immunity puts them in a group that is more at risk of contracting the virus and suffering from complications of COVID-19 compared to the general population (Al-Quteimat & Amer, 2020; Al‐Shamsi et al., 2020). During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with breast cancer experienced severe mental disorders such as fear of being infected with COVID-19 during the chemotherapy process and even death (Erdoğan et al., 2022; Hikmat et al., 2022; Stanizzo et al., 2022). This condition also has an impact on physical condition and causes weakness (Yang et al., 2021). With conditions that continue to decline, this can have an impact on the quality of life of patients with breast cancer. Patients with malignancy experience high levels of psychological distress. Fear of COVID-19 combined with interference with some treatment programs can affect the psychological health of cancer patients (Momenimovahed & Salehiniya, 2021). The COVID-19 pandemic has had an emotional impact, and previous research has shown that breast cancer survivors also feel emotional distress, such as exaggerated anxiety and depression related to a higher level of ruminative response and chronic worry (Choobin et al., 2021). The most commonly reported stressor was a higher level of concern regarding the experienced anxiety and depressive symptoms and a higher fear of cancer recurrence (Massicotte et al., 2021). The previous review studies have only evaluated the quality of life in general, not specific to physical and mental HRQoL, and not during the COVID-19 pandemic (Heidary et al., 2023; Mokhtari-Hessari & Montazeri, 2020; Yan et al., 2016). Thus, this original study aimed to investigate the determinants and analyze their correlation to physical and mental HRQoL among patients with breast cancer during the COVID19 pandemic. 2. Methods 2.1 Research design A cross-sectional study was designed to investigate the correlation between independent and dependent variables (Arifin et al., 2022). The study’s reporting followed the guidelines outlined in the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies (STROBE) framework for crosssectional studies (Von Elm et al., 2007). 2.2 Setting and samples The study was conducted from September to October 2022 at a government hospital and a university hospital in Padang, Indonesia. Both study locations were elected as a referral hospitals for cancer treatment in Padang. A total of 260 respondents were recruited using convenience sampling. The sample size is measured by G*Power analysis statistical app with α=0.05, β=0.20, and effect size of 0.26 (medium effect size). Finally, the minimum sample size was 190-260 participants obtained based on the analysis (Cohen, 2013; Hohls et al., 2021). During the study process, no dropout respondents were found. All of the respondents met the criteria of 1) being female aged 18-60 years, 2) being diagnosed with breast cancer for at least six months, 3) having been during or undergoing chemotherapy and radiology, 4) communicating in the local language (Padang) and Indonesia language, 5) and having the commitment to participate in this study. In addition, respondents with cognitive impairment or psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, psychosis, and depression) before the breast cancer diagnosis, were excluded from this study. 2.3 Measurement and data collection The independent variables in this study included demographical data (age, marital status, educational level, and employment status), disease characteristics (cancer stages, cancer treatment, and disease duration), anxiety, and depression. Moreover, the dependent variables were physical and mental HRQoL. The general information sheet was designed to gather data on demographic and disease characteristics, encompassing details such as age, marital status, education level, number of children, employment status, cancer stages, cancer treatment, and disease duration. Anxiety and depression were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), consisting of seven items for depression and seven for anxiety (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983). Each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, to 3 = most of the time). The total score ranged from 0 to 21, indicating low anxiety and depression (0-7) and high anxiety and depression (8-21) (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983). The HADS-Indonesian version scale showed Copyright © 2023, NMJN, e-ISSN 2406-8799, p-ISSN 2087-7811 Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 13(3), 2023, 265 acceptable internal reliability with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85 for anxiety and 0.80 for depression, with the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin statistics of 0.89 and Bartlett’s test of sphericity (χ2 (91, N=200) of 1052.38, p<0.001 (Tiksnadi et al., 2023). Physical and mental HRQoL was measured using the short form (SF-12) with 12-items and calculated following the scoring algorithm developed by Ware et al. (1996). SF-12 measures consist of two concepts, including Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and Mental Component Summary (MCS-12). SF-12 consists of two components; first, the PCS-12 score is represented by six items: 1) general health with response categories excellent/very good/good/ fair, 2) moderate activities, 3) climb several flights of stairs with response category limited a lot/ limited/not limited at all, 4) accomplish less (physical), 5) limited in kind of work with response category all of the time/most of the time/a little of the time/none of the time, and 6) pain interference with response category not at all/a little bit/moderate/quite a bit/extremely. Second, MCS-12 is represented by six items: accomplish less (emotional), did work less carefully, calm and peaceful, energy or vitality, downhearted and blue, and social limitations. All items MCS-12 with response: all of the time/most of the time/a little of the time/none of the time. The PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores were computed and normalized for SF-12v2 according to published algorithms (Ware et al., 1996). Scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better physical and mental health functioning. A score of 50 or less on the PCS-12 could be considered low physical functioning, while a score of 42 or less on the MCS-12 may be indicative of low mental health functioning (Soh et al., 2021; Ware et al., 1995). The SF-12 version 2 showed good internal reliability for PCS-12 with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.83 for anxiety and 0.81 for MCS-12 (Soh et al., 2021). The data collection process commenced after obtaining permission from the concerned hospitals, adhering to ethical guidelines. The primary method employed for data acquisition involved the administration of a structured questionnaire. To facilitate this process, the researcher, with the aid of a research assistant, conducted the data collection. The researcher and the assistant worked collaboratively, accompanying respondents throughout the questionnaire completion. This approach ensured a supportive environment, enabling respondents to address any queries or concerns they encountered while filling out the questionnaire. By maintaining a supportive presence, the researcher aimed to enhance respondent comfort and accuracy in providing necessary information for the study. 2.4 Data analysis The data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 22.0 software. Descriptive statistics comprised frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. A Chi-squared test was used to examine the correlations between demographic characteristics and disease characteristics, anxiety, depression, and physical and mental HRQoL. The variables with a p-value of ≤ 0.20 in the Chi-squared test were further entered into the univariate logistic regression analysis to examine the association of these influential factors with physical and mental HRQoL (Mickey & Greenland, 1989). A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify the significant predictors of the quality of life of breast cancer survivors after adjusting for confounding variables in the univariate logistic regression model (p<0.05). All tests were two-tailed, with p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. 2.5 Ethical considerations This study has been deemed ethically appropriate by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Dr. M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia (No. L.B.02.02/5.7/410/2022), in accordance with seven WHO 2011 standards. All study participants received a consent form describing the study’s aim and providing adequate information for them to make an informed decision about their participation. Those participants willing to participate had to sign the form before completing the questionnaire, and participation was voluntary without any coercion. 3. Results 3.1 Demographics and disease characteristics of the respondents In total, 260 eligible breast cancer survivors participated in this study. More than half of respondents (62.7%) were younger, with a mean age of 47.14 years (range, 18-60 years). Most Copyright © 2023, NMJN, e-ISSN 2406-8799, p-ISSN 2087-7811 Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 13(3), 2023, 266 respondents were married (81.2%) and had a high education level (80.8%). Regarding the number of children, more than half (67.3%) of participants had ≤ 3 children and were unemployed (54.0%). According to the cancer characteristics, more than half of the participants were diagnosed in III or IV stages, and the majority received 2-3 treatments. Overall, the mean of the disease duration is 34.26 months. Furthermore, more than 50% had high anxiety, and less than 70% had low depression. From this study, more than half of respondents had low physical and mental health functioning related to quality of life (Table 1). Table 1. Characteristics of respondents (n=260) Variables Age (years) Younger (≤50 years old) Older (>50 years old) Marital status Married Widowed/Others Education level Low High Number of children ≤3 >3 Employment status Employed Unemployed Cancer stages I and II III and IV Cancer treatment 1 treatment† 2-3 treatment‡ Disease duration (months) ≤24 months >24months Anxiety Low anxiety High anxiety Depression Low depression High depression Physical health functioning Low High Mental health functioning Low High M(SD) 47.14(7.37) 34.26(26.91) 7.48(4.22) 5.67(3.80) 42.88(7.34) n % 163 97 62.7 37.3 211 49 81.2 18.8 50 210 19.2 80.8 175 85 67.3 32.7 105 155 40.4 59.6 118 142 45.4 54.6 37 222 14.3 85.7 145 115 55.8 44.2 123 137 47.3 52.7 192 68 73.8 26.2 139 121 53.5 46.5 134 126 51.5 48.5 42.53(10.93) Notes: † Surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy; ‡Surgery and, or chemotherapy and radiotherapy and others M: Mean; SD: standard deviation 3.2 The correlation of demographic and disease characteristics, anxiety, and depression with physical and mental HRQoL Table 2 shows the bivariate analysis of physical and mental HRQoL. In the physical HRQoL, age, number of children, employment status, cancer stages, anxiety, and depression showed a significant relationship with physical HRQoL (p<0.05). Moreover, number of children, employment status, anxiety and depression had a significant correlation with mental HRQoL (p<0.05). Furthermore, the variables with p<0.20 were included in the multivariate analysis. Copyright © 2023, NMJN, e-ISSN 2406-8799, p-ISSN 2087-7811 Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 13(3), 2023, 267 Table 2. The correlations of demography, disease characteristics, anxiety, depression, physical, with mental health-related quality of life (n=260) Physical High Low f (%) f (%) Variables Age (years) Younger (≤50) Older (>50) Marital status Married Widowed/Others Education level High Low Number of children ≤3 >3 Employment status Employed Unemployed Cancer stages I and II III and IV Cancer treatment 1 treatment† 2-3 treatment‡ Disease duration (months) ≤24 months >24months Anxiety Low anxiety High anxiety Depression Low depression High depression Mental X2 p High f (%) Low f (%) X2 p 69 (39.3) 57 (58.8) 99 (60.7) 40 (41.2) 9.29 0.002 76 (46.6) 50 (51.5) 87 (41.9) 47 (48.5) 0.59 0.443 98 (46.3) 23 (46.9) 113 (53.6) 26 (53.1) 0.00 0.950 99 (46.9) 27 (55.1) 112 (53.1) 22 (44.9) 1.06 0.302 103 (49.0) 18 (36.0) 107 (51.0) 32 (64.0) 2.76 0.096 105 (50.0) 21 (42.0) 105 (50.0) 29 (58.0) 1.035 0.309 70 (40.0) 51 (60.0) 105 (60.0) 9.19 0.002 67 (38.3) 59 (69.4) 108 (61.7) 26 (30.6) 22.19 <0.001 70 (66.7) 51 (32.9) 35 (33.3) 104 (67.1) 28.68 <0.001 80 (76.2) 46 (29.7) 25 (23.8) 109 (70.3) 54.22 <0.001 65 (55.1) 56 (39.4) 53 (44.9) 86 (60.6) 6.43 0.012 62 (52.5) 64 (45.1) 56 (47.5) 78 (54.9) 1.44 0.230 18 (48.6) 102 (45.9) 19 (51.4) 120 (54.1) 0.93 0.760 16 (43.2) 109 (49.1) 21 (56.8) 113 (50.9) 0.43 0.509 66 (45.5) 55 (47.8) 79 (54.5) 60 (52.2) 0.13 0.711 67 (46.2) 59 (51.3) 78 (53.8) 56 (48.7) 0.66 0.414 78 (63.4) 43 (31.4) 45 (36.6) 94 (68.6) 26.72 <0.001 84 (68.3) 42 (30.7) 39 (31.7) 95 (69.3) 36.75 <0.001 107 55.7) 14 (20.6) 85 (44.3) 54 (79.4) 24.92 <0.001 104 (54.2) 22 (32.4) 88 (45.8) 46 (67.6) 9.56 0.002 34 (40.0) 3.3 Determinants of physical and mental HRQoL Based on the multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression, respondents with younger age had 2.08 times more likely to have low physical health compared to older age (p-value: 0.010; aOR:2.08; 95% CI:1.18-3.67). Based on work status, respondents who did not work (unemployed) had 2.29 times greater to have low physical health rather than employed (p-value: 0.022; aOR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.16-4.53). In addition, respondents with high depression had 2.41 times greater to have low physical health compared to low depression (p-value: 0.026; aOR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.135.12). According to mental HRQoL, unemployed respondents had 4.15 times more likely to have low mental health compared to employed respondents (p-value: <0.001; aOR: 4.15; 95% CI: 2.148.04). Furthermore, respondents with high anxiety had 2.71 times greater to have low mental health compared to respondents with low anxiety (p-value: 0.004; aOR: 2.71; 95% CI: 1.38-5.33) (Table 3). 4. Discussion Physical and mental health-related quality of life (HRQoL) becomes a critical concern for patients with breast cancer. This study explored the determinants affecting physical and mental HRQoL from the perspectives of demographics and physiological symptoms such as anxiety and depression. The correlation between age, employment status, and depression is discussed concerning physical HRQoL. Additionally, work status and anxiety are examined in relation to mental HRQoL. Copyright © 2023, NMJN, e-ISSN 2406-8799, p-ISSN 2087-7811 Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 13(3), 2023, 268 Table 3. Multivariate analysis of physical and mental health–related quality of life Physical health Variables Age Older (>50 years old) Younger (≤50 years old) Level of education High Low Number of children >3 ≤3 Work status Employed Unemployed Cancer stages I and II III and IV Anxiety Low High Depression Low High Mental health aOR (95% CI) p-value aOR (95% CI) p-value Ref. 2.08** (1.18 – 3.67) 0.010 NA NA NA NA Ref. 1.03 (0.26 – 4.00) 0.966 NA NA NA NA Ref. 1.16 (0.61 – 1.18) 0.750 Ref. 1.87* (0.98 – 3.57) 0.057 Ref. 2.29** (1.16 – 4.53) 0.022 Ref. 4.15*** (2.14 – 8.04) <0.001 Ref. 1.65 (0.94 – 2.89) 0.083 NA NA NA NA Ref. 1.73 (0.89 – 3.33) 0.096 Ref. 2.71*** (1.38 – 5.33) 0.004 Ref. 2.41** (1.13 – 5.12) 0.026 Ref. 0.79 (0.37 – 1.65) 0.533 Notes: *p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01 4.1 Physical HRQoL In this study, respondents aged < 50 years were more likely to have low physical HRQoL. Physical activity is a crucial for better quality of life and ageing in the long-term care. This finding is contradicted with a previous study which stated that people aged < 50 years had better physical HRQoL (Jang et al., 2019). Studies stated that engaging in regular physical exercise significantly enhances individuals’ physical HRQoL (Gill et al., 2013; Marquez et al., 2020; Wei et al., 2022). Low physical HRQoL at aged < 50 years can be influenced by disease and other risk behaviors, such as smoking and drinking that make it unable to carry out physical activities properly (Megari, 2013; Nari et al., 2021; Tran et al., 2022). However, this study is still limited to several variables, such as lifestyle, which might be associated with the low physical HRQoL in population aged < 50 years. Therefore, the addition of variables to the future studies is highly recommended. In addition, respondents who were unemployed had more likely to have low physical HRQoL. Unemployment in cancer patients is correlated with increased financial burden, increased costs of living, and ongoing treatment (Mols et al., 2020). In addition, people who are working will have more physical activity, so they can increase their physical strength, and vice versa for people who are unemployed (Schutgens et al., 2009). However, a significant aspect during the COVID-19 pandemic is the situation where parents must manage both childcare and homeschooling (Vogelbacher); this situation can potentially impact physical HRQoL (Galanti et al., 2021; Tavares, 2017). In addition, with these conditions, it is widely reported that people experience increased stress, malnutrition characterized by increased body weight, and decreased physical HRQoL (Alshahrani et al., 2022; Majumdar et al., 2020; Muñoz-Corona et al., 2022). Furthermore, this study also showed that respondents with high depression had more likely to have low physical HRQoL. This finding is similar with the previous studies (Cho et al., 2019; Fernandes et al., 2021; Hohls et al., 2021). The condition of the COVID-19 pandemic is an added burden that can induce depression among breast cancer patients. Moreover, this circumstance is compounded by uncertainties regarding recovery and the necessity for regular treatments like chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (de Souza et al., 2014). Also, depressive conditions can exacerbate the severity of symptoms for people dealing with breast cancer (Wondimagegnehu et al., 2019). This has an impact on the immune system and physical conditions that can get weaker Copyright © 2023, NMJN, e-ISSN 2406-8799, p-ISSN 2087-7811 Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 13(3), 2023, 269 (Wang et al., 2020). For this reason, it is very important to treat depression in patients with breast cancer, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. 4.2 Mental HRQoL Regarding the mental HRQoL, unemployed respondents were more likely to have low mental HRQoL. Patients with breast cancer who have no activity or low social relationships can cause a decrease in low mental health (Yang et al., 2022). Previous studies indicated that breast cancer patients experiencing stable physical health and engaged in work tend to exhibit higher mental HRQoL (Carreira et al., 2018; Jin, 2022). This correlation might be attributed to the supportive environment fostered by colleagues and the potential diversion of the patient’s focus away from their illness (Finck et al., 2018). Consequently, it is suggested that breast cancer patients in favorable physical health conditions can actively engage in physical activities, maintain productivity, and cultivate strong social relationships, which can contribute positively to both their physical and mental quality of life. This recommendation emphasizes the potential benefits derived from staying physically active and socially engaged despite the challenges posed by the illness. Patients with breast cancer experienced anxiety related to cancer treatments, fear of cancer recurrence and fear about uncertainties surrounding life and death (Baqutayan, 2012; Tiedtke et al., 2012). In addition, cancer patients also have anxiety regarding postponed appointments, delayed treatments, and limited access to medical facilities due to COVID-19 pandemic (Rucinska & Nawrocki, 2022) . Furthermore, cancer patients are vulnerable to COVID-19 infecttion and had 60% increased risk of positive COVID-19 test compard with individual without cancer (Lee et al., 2021). These collective stressor may contributes to anxiety among patients with breast cancer, impacting their mental HRQoL. Therefore, it can make the healing process of the disease take longer (Carreira et al., 2018). Prior investigations have demonstrated a notable increase in anxiety levels among breast cancer patients amid the COVID-19 pandemic (Bartmann et al., 2021; Shah et al.; Stanizzo et al., 2022; Yasin et al., 2021). This surge in anxiety can be attributed to the fear associated with potential COVID-19 infection, intensifying concerns about the worsening of their existing medical condition and the heightened risk of mortality. Consequently, this finding places an augmented responsibility on nurses. Beyond addressing the complexities of cancer treatment, nurses are now compelled to provide interventions aimed at alleviating anxiety among breast cancer patients. Effective mental health management becomes crucial, encompassing strategies to regulate stress, depression, and anxiety levels. These interventions are essential to mitigate the amplified psychological distress experienced by breast cancer patients, thereby enhancing their overall well-being and coping mechanisms during this challenging period characterized by the pandemic. 5. Implications and limitations In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, understanding the nuances HRQoL among breast cancer patients has never been more critical. Our research underscores the profound role healthcare professionals play in shaping the QOL of these patients. During global crises, such as pandemics, external factors might exacerbate the mental and physical health challenges faced by breast cancer patients. Nurses should recognize the heightened challenges faced by breast cancer patients during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic and offer personalized care and interventions that address both physical and mental health concerns. This brings to the fore the crucial importance of tailored clinical interventions. Furthermore, our findings illuminate the necessity for systemic changes. Policymakers, armed with this knowledge, can champion reforms that embrace specialized care models during such crises. This study offers empirical evidence to identify the determinants of physical and mental HRQoL among patients with breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, several limitations should be considered. Firstly, the confirmation of causal relationships between risk factors and physical and mental health-related quality of life was hindered by the cross-sectional study design. Secondly, the limited generalizability of their findings arose from recruiting all participants solely from two hospitals within one province of Indonesia. Thirdly, the exclusion of other risk factors such as chronic diseases, health behaviors, and lifestyle factors from the study should be noted. Copyright © 2023, NMJN, e-ISSN 2406-8799, p-ISSN 2087-7811 Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 13(3), 2023, 270 6. Conclusion Physical and mental HRQoL aspects among breast cancer patients shows a substantial correlation with various demographic and psychological factors, including age and employment status, as well as anxiety and depression levels. This study revealed a clear association indicating that higher levels of anxiety and depression significantly increase the likelihood of experiencing lower physical and mental HRQoL. This underscores the critical need for targeted interventions aimed at reducing anxiety and depression specifically tailored for breast cancer patients. Initiating such interventions becomes pivotal in addressing the challenges posed by these psychological factors, thereby potentially enhancing the overall quality of life experienced by individuals grappling with breast cancer. Recognizing the impact of anxiety and depression on the QoL of breast cancer patients and implementing targeted strategies such as psychological intervention to mitigate these psychological challenges stands as a vital step in improving the well-being and coping mechanisms of these individuals. Acknowledgment We would like to thank all the patients with breast cancer, physicians and nurses who participated in this study. Author contribution Conceptualization: Mohd Jamil, Leni Merdawati, Daan Khambri Data curation: Wirsma Arif, Harahap, Formal analysis: Leni Merdawati, Boby Febri Krisdianto Validation: Daan Khambri, Leni Merdawati Visualization: Mohd Jamil, Boby Febri Krisdianto Writing original draft: Mohd Jamil, Leni Merdawati, Hidayat Arifin Writing-review & editing: Leni Merdawati, Hidayat Arifin Conflict of interest None References Al-Quteimat, O. M., & Amer, A. M. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 43(6), 452-455. https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000712 Al‐Shamsi, H. O., Alhazzani, W., Alhuraiji, A., Coomes, E. A., Chemaly, R. F., Almuhanna, M., Wolff, R. A., Ibrahim, N. K., Chua, M. L., & Hotte, S. J. (2020). A practical approach to the management of cancer patients during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic: An international collaborative group. The Oncologist, 25(6), e936-e945. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0213 Alshahrani, S. M., Alghannam, A. F., Taha, N., Alqahtani, S. S., Al-Mutairi, A., Al-Saud, N., & Alghnam, S. (2022). The Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on weight and body mass index in Saudi Arabia: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 775022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.775022 Arifin, H., Ibrahim, K., Rahayuwati, L., Herliani, Y. K., Kurniawati, Y., Pradipta, R. O., Sari, G. M., Ko, N.-Y., & Wiratama, B. S. (2022). HIV-related knowledge, information, and their contribution to stigmatization attitudes among females aged 15–24 years: Regional disparities in Indonesia. BMC Public Health, 22, 637. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-02213046-7 Baqutayan, S. M. (2012). The effect of anxiety on breast cancer patients. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 34(2), 119-123. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.101774 Bartmann, C., Fischer, L.-M., Hübner, T., Müller-Reiter, M., Wöckel, A., McNeill, R. V., Schlaiss, T., Kittel-Schneider, S., Kämmerer, U., & Diessner, J. (2021). The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological stress in breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer, 21, 1356. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09012-y Carreira, H., Williams, R., Müller, M., Harewood, R., Stanway, S., & Bhaskaran, K. (2018). Associations between breast cancer survivorship and adverse mental health outcomes: A Copyright © 2023, NMJN, e-ISSN 2406-8799, p-ISSN 2087-7811 Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 13(3), 2023, 271 systematic review. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 110(12), 1311-1327. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy177 Cho, Y., Lee, J. K., Kim, D.-H., Park, J.-H., Choi, M., Kim, H.-J., Nam, M.-J., Lee, K.-U., Han, K., & Park, Y.-G. (2019). Factors associated with quality of life in patients with depression: A nationwide population-based study. Plos One, 14(7), e0219455-e0219455. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219455 Choobin, M. H., Mirabolfathi, V., Chapman, B., Moradi, A. R., Grunfeld, E. A., & Derakshan, N. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 outbreak on emotional and cognitive vulnerability in Iranian women with breast cancer. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 663310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663310 Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. de Souza, B. F., de Moraes, J. A., Inocenti, A., dos Santos, M. A., Silva, A. E. B. d. C., & Miasso, A. I. (2014). Women with breast cancer taking chemotherapy: Depression symptoms and treatment adherence. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 22(5), 866-873. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3564.2491 Erdoğan, A. P., Ekinci, F., Acar, Ö., & Göksel, G. (2022). Level of COVID-19 fear in cancer patients. Middle East Current Psychiatry, 29, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-022-00181-5 Fernandes, M. d. S. V., Mendonça, C. R., da Silva, T. M. V., & Noll, M. (2021). The relationship between depression and quality of life in students and the academic consequences: Protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, 101812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101812 Finck, C., Barradas, S., Zenger, M., & Hinz, A. (2018). Quality of life in breast cancer patients: Associations with optimism and social support. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 18(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.11.002 Folsom, D. P., Depp, C., Palmer, B. W., Mausbach, B. T., Golshan, S., Fellows, I., Cardenas, V., Patterson, T. L., Kraemer, H. C., & Jeste, D. V. (2009). Physical and mental health-related quality of life among older people with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 108(1-3), 207-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2008.12.008 Galanti, T., Guidetti, G., Mazzei, E., Zappalà, S., & Toscano, F. (2021). Work from home during the COVID-19 outbreak: The impact on employees' remote work productivity, engagement, and stress. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(7), e426-e432. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236 Gill, D. L., Hammond, C. C., Reifsteck, E. J., Jehu, C. M., Williams, R. A., Adams, M. M., Lange, E. H., Becofsky, K., Rodriguez, E., & Shang, Y.-T. (2013). Physical activity and quality of life. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 46(Suppl 1), S28-S34. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2013.46.S.S28 Hasan, S. S., Capstick, T., Ahmed, R., Kow, C. S., Mazhar, F., Merchant, H. A., & Zaidi, S. T. R. (2020). Mortality in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and corticosteroids use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine, 14(11), 1149-1163. Heidary, Z., Ghaemi, M., Hossein Rashidi, B., Kohandel Gargari, O., & Montazeri, A. (2023). Quality of life in breast cancer patients: A systematic review of the qualitative studies. Cancer Control, 30, 10732748231168318. https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748231168318 Hikmat, R., Rahayu, U., Pebrianti, S., Cahyani, E. M., Sari, C. P., & Afrilia, G. (2022). Postoperative pain management with non-pharmacological interventions in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: A systematic scoping review. The Journal of Palembang Nursing Studies, 1(3), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.55048/jpns.v1i3.24 Hohls, J. K., König, H.-H., Quirke, E., & Hajek, A. (2021). Anxiety, depression and quality of lifeA systematic review of evidence from longitudinal observational studies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(22), 12022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212022 Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, G., Xu, J., & Gu, X. (2020). Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet, 395(10223), 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 Jang, H. J., Satre, D. D., Leyden, W., Leibowitz, A., & Silverberg, M. J. (2019). Mental and physical quality of life by age groups in people living with HIV. The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 30(5), 500-510. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNC.0000000000000064 Copyright © 2023, NMJN, e-ISSN 2406-8799, p-ISSN 2087-7811 Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 13(3), 2023, 272 Jin, J. (2022). Factors associated with the quality of work life among working breast cancer survivors. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 9(2), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjon.2021.11.005 Lee, K. A., Ma, W., Sikavi, D. R., Drew, D. A., Nguyen, L. H., Bowyer, R. C. E., Cardoso, M. J., Fall, T., Freidin, M. B., Gomez, M., Graham, M., Guo, C. G., Joshi, A. D., Kwon, S., Lo, C. H., Lochlainn, M. N., Menni, C., Murray, B., Mehta, R., . . . Chan, A. T. (2021). Cancer and risk of COVID-19 through a general community survey. Oncologist, 26(1), e182-185. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0572 Majumdar, P., Biswas, A., & Sahu, S. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown: Cause of sleep disruption, depression, somatic pain, and increased screen exposure of office workers and students of India. Chronobiology International, 37(8), 1191-1200. Marquez, D. X., Aguiñaga, S., Vásquez, P. M., Conroy, D. E., Erickson, K. I., Hillman, C., Stillman, C. M., Ballard, R. M., Sheppard, B. B., Petruzzello, S. J., King, A. C., & Powell, K. E. (2020). A systematic review of physical activity and quality of life and well-being. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10(5), 1098-1109. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz198 Massicotte, V., Ivers, H., & Savard, J. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic stressors and psychological symptoms in breast cancer patients. Current Oncology, 28(1), 294-300. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010034 Megari, K. (2013). Quality of life in chronic disease patients. Health Psychology Research, 1(3), e27-e27. https://doi.org/10.4081/hpr.2013.e27 Mickey, R. M., & Greenland, S. (1989). The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. American Journal of Epidemiology, 129(1), 125-137. Mokhtari-Hessari, P., & Montazeri, A. (2020). Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: Review of reviews from 2008 to 2018. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18, 338. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01591-x Mols, F., Tomalin, B., Pearce, A., Kaambwa, B., & Koczwara, B. (2020). Financial toxicity and employment status in cancer survivors. A systematic literature review. Support Care Cancer, 28(12), 5693-5708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05719-z Momenimovahed, Z., & Salehiniya, H. (2021). Delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer during coronavirus pandemic. EXCLI Journal, 20, 142-144. https://doi.org/10.17179/excli20203318 Muñoz-Corona, C., Gutiérrez-Canales, L. G., Ortiz-Ledesma, C., Martínez-Navarro, L. J., Macías, A. E., Scavo-Montes, D. A., & Guaní-Guerra, E. (2022). Quality of life and persistence of COVID-19 symptoms 90 days after hospital discharge. The Journal of International Medical Research, 50(7), 03000605221110492. https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605221110492 Nari, F., Jeong, W., Jang, B. N., Lee, H. J., & Park, E.-C. (2021). Association between healthy lifestyle score changes and quality of life and health-related quality of life: A longitudinal analysis of South Korean panel data. BMJ Open, 11(10), e047933-e047933. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047933 Rucinska, M., & Nawrocki, S. (2022). COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact on cancer patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12470. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912470 Schutgens, C. A. E., Schuring, M., Voorham, T. A. J., & Burdorf, A. (2009). Changes in physical health among participants in a multidisciplinary health programme for long-term unemployed persons. BMC Public Health, 9, 197. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-197 Shafran, R., Rachman, S., Whittal, M., Radomsky, A., & Coughtrey, A. (2021). Fear and anxiety in COVID-19: Preexisting anxiety disorders. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 28(4), 459467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.03.003 Shah, Y. B., Kjelstrom, S., Martinez, D., Leitenberger, A., Manasseh, D.-M., Bollmann-Jenkins, M., Partridge, A., Kaklamani, V., Chlebowski, R., Larson, S., & Weiss, M. (2023). Risk factors for heightened COVID-19-Related anxiety among breast cancer patients. Cancer Medicine, 12(3), 3577-3588. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5184 Soh, S.-E., Morello, R., Ayton, D., Ahern, S., Scarborough, R., Zammit, C., Brand, M., Stirling, R. G., & Zalcberg, J. (2021). Measurement properties of the 12-item short form health survey version 2 in Australians with lung cancer: A Rasch analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19, 157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01794-w Copyright © 2023, NMJN, e-ISSN 2406-8799, p-ISSN 2087-7811 Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 13(3), 2023, 273 Stanizzo, M. R., Castelli, L., Di Nardo, C., Brunetti, M., De Sanctis, C., & Ghiggia, A. (2022). Psychological distress in breast cancer patients during the Italian COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11433. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811433 Tavares, A. I. (2017). Telework and health effects review. International Journal of Healthcare, 3(2), 30-36. Tiedtke, C., de Rijk, A., Donceel, P., Christiaens, M. R., & de Casterlé, B. D. (2012). Survived but feeling vulnerable and insecure: A qualitative study of the mental preparation for RTW after breast cancer treatment. BMC Public Health, 12, 538. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12538 Tiksnadi, B. B., Triani, N., Fihaya, F. Y., Turu' Allo, I. J., Iskandar, S., & Putri, D. A. E. (2023). Validation of hospital anxiety and depression scale in an Indonesian population: A scale adaptation study. Family Medicine and Community Health, 11(2), e001775. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2022-001775 Tran, T. X. M., Lee, S., Oh, C.-M., Chang, Y. J., & Cho, H. (2022). Understanding health problems in people with extremely low health-related quality of life in Korea. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 4037. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07528-2 Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. https://www.equatornetwork.org/reporting-guidelines/strobe/ Wang, X., Wang, N., Zhong, L., Wang, S., Zheng, Y., Yang, B., Zhang, J., Lin, Y., & Wang, Z. (2020). Prognostic value of depression and anxiety on breast cancer recurrence and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 282,203 patients. Molecular Psychiatry, 25(12), 3186-3197. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-00865-6 Ware, J., Jr., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220-233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 Ware, J. E., Keller, S. D., & Kosinski, M. (1995). SF-12: How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Health Institute, New England Medical Center. Wei, L., Hu, Y., Tao, Y., Hu, R., & Zhang, L. (2022). The effects of physical exercise on the quality of life of healthy older adults in China: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 895373. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895373 Wondimagegnehu, A., Abebe, W., Abraha, A., & Teferra, S. (2019). Depression and social support among breast cancer patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Cancer, 19, 836. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6007-4 Yan, B., Yang, L.-M., Hao, L.-P., Yang, C., Quan, L., Wang, L.-H., Wu, Z., Li, X.-P., Gao, Y.-T., Sun, Q., & Yuan, J.-M. (2016). Determinants of quality of life for breast cancer patients in Shanghai, China. Plos One, 11(4), e0153714. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153714 Yang, L., Chai, P., Yu, J., & Fan, X. (2021). Effects of cancer on patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 63,019 participants. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 18(1), 298-307. https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0559 Yang, Y., Lin, Y., Sikapokoo, G. O., Min, S. H., Caviness-Ashe, N., Zhang, J., Ledbetter, L., & Nolan, T. S. (2022). Social relationships and their associations with affective symptoms of women with breast cancer: A scoping review. Plos One, 17(8), e0272649. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272649 Yasin, A. I., Topcu, A., Shbair, A. T., Isleyen, Z. S., Ozturk, A., Besiroglu, M., & Türk, H. M. (2021). Anxiety levels of breast cancer patients in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future Oncology, 17(25), 3373-3381. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2020-1265 Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361-370. Copyright © 2023 NMJN. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0). Copyright © 2023, NMJN, e-ISSN 2406-8799, p-ISSN 2087-7811