Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management http://dx.
org/10.
29244/jpsl.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Potential Floristic Analysis of Peat Swamp Village Forest in Jambi Province to Supports Village Ecotourism Programme Nursantia.
Maria Ulfaa.
Zuhratus Salehb Department of Forestry.
Faculty of Agriculture.
Jambi University.
Muaro Jambi, 36361.
Indonesia Jambi Natural Resources Conservation Center.
Jambi, 36122.
Indonesia Article History Received 04 August 2023 Revised 22 December 2023 Accepted 03 April 2024 Keywords floristic analysis, peat swamp forest.
Pematang
Rahim Village Forest, social
ABSTRACT
Pematang Rahim Village Forest is one of the social forestry schemes offered by the government.
Pematang Rahim Village Forest Management Institute makes ecotourism as the basis for its Ecotourism in peat ecosystems in village forests creates biodiversity inside, especially plants, as the basis for planned ecotourism.
The purpose of this research is to obtain data and information about the potential flora to support ecotourism-based village forest management.
This study was carried out for 8 months from March to October 2021, located in the Village Forest of Pematang Rahim.
East Tanjung Jabung Regency, and further analysis was conducted at the Herbarium and Laboratory of Management.
Department of Forestry.
Faculty of Agriculture.
Jambi University.
Research results in the field show that peat forests are generally managed as village forests in Pematang rahim in good condition.
There are various types of trees and plants in different life forms.
The study found 26 families, 58 genera, and 104 species, with a total of 2,831 individuals consisting of 855 seedlings, 880 saplings, 546 poles, and 550 trees.
The diversity index showed a high value (> .
for each growth stage from seedlings, sapling, pole to trees .
The existence of various peat-specific species with ecosystem conditions that are still maintained is expected to add value to ecotourism activities in the Pematang Rahim Village Forest area in the Introduction The Indonesian government, through the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, is intensifying the social forestry program as one of its efforts so that the community around the forest can take advantage of the potential of the existing forest.
Village forests are a part of several types of social forestry in Indonesia.
One of the village forests in the Jambi Province is located in the village of Pematang Rahim.
Mendahara Hulu District.
East Tanjung Jabung Regency.
This village forest is located around the Sungai Buluh Peat Protection Forest (HLG/Hutan Lindung Gambu.
and has an area of A 1,185 ha.
Village forest management rights were legally handed over on December 26, 2018, and managed through the village forest management agency (LPHD/Lembaga Pengelola Hutan Des.
The Village Forest Management Plan (RPHD/Rencana Pengelolaan Hutan Des.
, starting from 2019 to 2029 .
, includes plans for utilization activities such as area utilization businesses, collection of non-timber forest products, utilization of environmental services, and utilization of carbon sequestration.
Pematang Rahim Village Government on October 17, 2018 has issued Village Regulation number 8 of 2018 concerning Protection and Management Peat is one way to prevent village forest management from damaging the Peat Ecosystem in Pematang Rahim Village.
Village forest management is expected to restore damaged forest areas, and this effort also aims to improve the economic community by utilizing non-timber forest products.
Destruction of the forest and peatland is still happening to preserve the forest, and it is necessary to manage it properly to maintain forest sustainability.
The Village Forest area.
Pematang Rahim.
Corresponding Author: Maria Ulfa Indonesia.
ulfa@unja.
Department of Forestry.
Jambi University.
Muaro Jambi.
Jambi.
A 2024 Nursanti et al.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, allowing unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided proper credit is given to the original authors.
Think twice before printing this journal paper.
Save paper, trees, and Earth! is currently developing ecotourism, which utilizes environmental services as a form of responsibility for sustainable forests and the environment.
Biodiversity plays an important role in ecotourism by highlighting the quality of each destination.
In the peat ecosystem of Pematang Village Forest Rahim (Hutan Desa Pematang Rahim in bahasa/HDPR), the composition of biodiversity can provide added value to ecotourism activities.
Biodiversity has a positive impact on ecotourism .
, while the loss of biodiversity will reduce the quality of ecotourism .
Habibullah et al.
confirmed that ecotourism does not survive without supporting biodiversity.
Forest plants, as the main components of peat ecosystems, are interesting topics to explore.
Peat ecosystems contain trees such as ramin (Gonystyus bancanu.
, several types of meranti (Shorea spp.
), and other forest trees .
Undergrowth is also interesting in pitcher plants (Nepenthes spp.
), orchids, and some palms .
The existence of plants that grow naturally, along with all types of utilization in an ecosystem, is indeed very interesting if associated with ecotourism activities .
Pematang Rahim Village Forest Management Institution makes ecotourism as the focus of management.
HDPR saves a lot of plant potential that has not been explored in depth, and it is scientifically identified as a means of supporting these ecotourism activities.
This study aims to determine the potential of plants found in the Pematang Rahim Village Forest and how existing plants can be utilized to support ecotourism in Pematang Rahim Village.
Materials and Methods Location and Time This research was carried out over eight months starting from March to October 2021 in Pematang Rahim Village Forest, and follow-up analyses were carried out in herbarium and forest management laboratories.
Forestry Department.
Faculty of Agriculture.
Jambi University.
Pematang Rahim Village.
Mendahara Ulu District.
East Tanjung Jabung Regency.
Jambi Province is located at coordinates S.
01A14'54.
67" and 103A32'20.
73" (Figure .
This village is located 1 to 5 m above the sea level.
Topographically.
Pematang Rahim Village is an expanse of lowlands.
Administratively Pematang Rahim Village is part of the Mendahara Ulu District.
East Tanjung Jabung Regency.
Jambi Province.
The distance from the village to the sub-district capital is A1.
5 km, can be reached by road with a time of A15 minutes by using two-wheeled or four-wheeled The distance to the district capital is A53 km, which takes approximately A1.
5 h, and A79 km from the provincial capital, which takes approximately A2 h.
The Pematang Rahim Village area is included in the peat landscape of the East Coast of Jambi, which stretches from Sungai Buluh Peat to the Londerang Peat Protected Forest with an area of 311,264 ha.
In this landscape, there are three area functions: Other Use Areas (APL/Area Penggunaan Laha.
Production Forests (HP/Hutan Produks.
, and HLG.
Within the Londerang HLG there is a Kandis Dendang City Village Forest while in the Buluh River Peat Protected Forest (HLG) there is a Pematang Village Forest and the Sinar Wajo Village Forest.
Materials and Tools In this study, the tools and materials used were in the form of stationery .
ens and book.
Nikon D5600 cameras for documenting the data results, cuttings, plastic, label paper, pencils, newsprint.
Global Positioning System (GPS) Garmin Map 64S, ropes and measuring tapes are used for field activities.
The materials used in the collection of samples were tally sheets, materials with the characteristics of plant organs, and 70% alcohol as a preservative.
Identification of plants in collaboration with Andalas University Herbarium (ANDA).
Data Collections Methods Vegetation data were collected using a combination of path and plot methods.
A total of 30 research plots were placed on six lines, each 100 m long, with five observation plots in each line there were 5 observation Each plot measured 20 y 20 m for tree observation, and inside it were placed 10 y 10 m plots for observation of poles, 5 y 5 m plots for observing saplings, and 2 y 2 plots for observing seedlings and undergrowth (Figure .
The total area of the observation plot was 1.
2 ha.
On the other side, interviews were conducted with members of forest farmer groups (KTH/Kelompok Tani Huta.
and village forest management institutions to determine what ecotourism activities were carried out in the HDPR.
The number of respondents was 49, consisting of 3 KTHs involved in managing the HDPR.
This journal is A Nursanti et al.
JPSL, 14.
| 664
Figure 1.
Research location.
Figure 2.
Illustration of observation plots.
Data Analysis Methods Important Value Index (IVI) IVI can be described as the ecological position of a species against other species in a community.
INP is the accumulation and conclusion of density, relative density, frequency, relative frequency, dominance, and relative dominance, all of which are part of the community structure analysis by Indriyanto .
The formula used is as follows:
Density (K) = .
umber of individuals of a specie.
/ .
otal observation are.
Relative density (KR) = .
ensity of a specie.
/ .
otal densit.
x 100% .
Frequency (F) = .
umber of species occurance in observation plot.
/ .
otal plot.
Relative frequency (FR) = .
requency of a specie.
/ .
otal frequenc.
x 100% .
Dominance (D) = .
asal area of a specie.
/ .
otal observation are.
Relative dominance (DR) = .
ominance of a specie.
/ .
otal dominanc.
x 100 % .
Important Value Index (INP) = KR FR .
or seedlings and sapling.
Important Value Index (INP) = KR FR DR .
or poles and tree.
http://dx.
org/10.
29244/jpsl.
JPSL, 14.
| 665
Species Richness Index.
Diversity Index and Evennes Index Species richness was measured using the Margalef Index using the following formula by Indriyanto .
ya ycAyci = .
cI Oe .
AEyaycu .
D Mg = Margalef Index = Number of species observed Ln N = Normal logarithm of total number of observed individuals The Shannon-Wiener diversity index uses the following formula by Indriyanto .
yaA = Ocycyc=1.
cyycn )yaycu ycyycn H' = Shannon diversity index S = Number of species Pi = The proportion of the number of individuals I Ln = log natural The range of diversity index values was H' O 1 = low diversity, 1 O H' O 3 = moderate diversity, and H' > 3 = high diversity.
The evenness index is determined by the formula .
ya = yaEyaycu( ycI) .
= Evennes index H' = Diversity index S = Number of species The evenness index criterion is as follows: if 0 < J < 0.
5, the community is depressed, if 0.
5 < J < 0.
75, the community is unstable and if 0.
75 < J, the community is stable.
Results and Discussion Forest Inventory and Vegetation Analysis Data were collected using observation plots, following the planned method.
The results collected included 26 families, 58 genera, and 104 species, with a total of 2,831 individuals, consisting of 855 seedlings, 880 saplings, 546 poles, and 550 trees.
Out of the 26 families recorded in the research plot, the Myrtaceae Family emerged with the most species .
followed by Lauraceae .
and Dipterocarpaceae and Anacardiaceae .
The details of the data collected from the HDPR observation plot in HDPR shown in Table 1 and Figure 3.
Table 1.
Numbers of families, species and individual at all growth stages in Pematang Rahim Village Forest.
Family Species Anacardiaceae Annonaceae Buchanania arborescens Campnosperma coriaceum Gluta aptera Gluta renghas Gluta sp.
Mangifera qudrifida Mangifera sp 1 Artabotrys sp.
Drepananthus biovulatus Goniothalamus macrophyllus Xylopia malayana Alstonia angustiloba.
Alstonia angustifolia Alstonia sp.
Dyera lowii Dyera sp.
Canarium sp.
Apocynaceae Burseraceae This journal is A Nursanti et al.
Quantity per growth stages Seedling Sapling Poles Trees Oc JPSL, 14.
| 666
No Family Celastraceae Clusiaceae Dilleniaceae Dipterocarpaceae Ebenaceae Elaeocarpaceae Euphorbiaceae Fabaceae Fagaceae Lauraceae Malvaceae Melastomataceae Moraceae Myristicaceae Myrtaceae http://dx.
org/10.
29244/jpsl.
Species Santiria griffithii Santiria laevigata Santiria sp.
Lophopetalum javanicum Calophyllum soullatri Calophyllum macrocarpum Cratoxylon arborescens Calophyllum sp.
Garcinia celebica Garcinia parvifolia Dillenia mangiayi Hopea sangal Shorea gibbosa Shorea hemisleyana Shorea palembanica Shorea sp1 Shorea sp2 Vatica sp.
Diospyros mangiayi Elaeocarpus sp.
Elaeocarpus petiolatus Balakata baccata Endospermum diadenum Macaranga griffithiana Macaranga puncticulata Pimelodendron griffithianum Archidendron clypearia Koompasia malaccensis Lithocarpus sp.
Actinodaphne angustifolia Beilschimedia sp.
Cryptocarya griffithiana Cinnamomum parthenoxylon Litsea machilifolia Litsea odorifera Litsea sp1 Litsea sp2 Durio sp.
Microcos sp.
Neesia altissima Sterculia sp.
Pternandra echinata Artocarpus elasticus Artocarpus kemando Ficus benjamina Ficus hispida Horsfieldia irya Horsfieldia sp.
Myristica iners Malaleuca sp.
Syzygium chloranthum Syzygium grande Syzygium jambos Syzygium nervosum Syzygium rubiginosum Syzygium polyanthum Syzygium pycnanthum Syzygium sp1 Syzygium sp3 Quantity per growth stages Seedling Sapling Poles Trees Oc JPSL, 14.
| 667
No Family Species Phyllanthaceae Rhizophoraceae Rubiaceae Sapindaceae Sapotaceae Tetrameristaceae Theaceae Total
Thymelaeaceae Thymelaeaceae Sapindaceae Rhizophoraceae Tetrameristaceae Trees Oc
2,831
Myrtaceae Plant Families Syzygium sp2 Syzygium sp4 Tristaniopsis obovata Antidesma leucoledon Antidesma montanum Antidesma sp Aporosa subcaudata Galearia filifiormis Phyllantus sp Gynotroches axillaris Pellacalyx cf.
Coffea sp.
Nauclea officinalis Psychotria sp1 Urophyllum sp1 Urophyllum sp2 Nephelium mangiayi Nephelium lappaceum Pometia sp.
Madhuca motleyana Palaquium quercifolium Palaquium leiocarpum Tetramerista glabra Tetramerista sp Adinandra borneensis Adinandra sp1 Adinandra sp2 Gonystylus bancanus Quantity per growth stages Seedling Sapling Poles Moraceae Malvaceae Fagaceae Euphorbiaceae Species Ebenaceae Dilleniaceae Celastraceae Apocynaceae Anacardiaceae Number of Species Figure 3.
Comparison of the number of families and plant species in Pematang Rahim Village Forest.
This journal is A Nursanti et al.
JPSL, 14.
| 668
The four major plant families that dominated the research location were wood producers and tree species, which are indicators of the conditions of the research location.
Several species of Myrtaceae, including Syzygium jambos.
polyanthum, and S.
rubiginosum, appeared at all stages of growth, with 186 individuals of these three species.
The family Lauraceae includes Litsea machilifolia.
Beilschimedia sp.
, and L.
with 209 individuals of the three species.
The Dipterocarpaceae Family was represented by Shorea palembanica and S.
hemisliyana, which appeared at all stages of growth, with 89 individuals of both species.
The Anacardiaceae Family is represented by Buchanania arborescens and Campnosperma coriaceum, with 106 individuals for both species.
In general, these four families contained 732 individuals .
86% of the total individuals recorded in the observation plo.
Based on this study, it can be said that the dominant family in this research location is also the dominant family in other studies in adjacent landscapes or in other areas with peat swamp forest characteristics.
Myrtaceae and Dipterocarpaceae families always appear in vegetation inventories carried out both in degraded .
ost-fir.
and non-degraded ecosystems.
Research .
Ae .
confirms this claim.
After the vegetation data were analyzed, it was observed that some species had a higher IVI than others did.
For example, in Hordsfieldia irya.
Although it was not the species with the highest INP at each growth stage, this species always appeared in the top five species with the highest IVI in each growth class.
Hordsfieldia irya already noted by Garsetiasih et al.
as one of species with high survival rates in peatland ecosystem.
Furthermore, it can be seen that the five species with the highest IVI at the seedling level were the same as those at the sapling level, although the order was different.
At the pole and tree stages, four species that always appeared in the top five had the highest IVI .
etails shown in Table .
Some other species are also very dominant in the number of individuals and have representatives at each stage of growth such as Macaranga puncticulata.
Archidendron clypearia.
Canarium sp.
Syzygium jambos.
Archidendron clypearia.
Balakata baccata.
Litsea machilifolia.
Elaeocarpus petiolatus and Shorea palembanica.
These high IVI's species is a mainstay in maintaining the continuity of vegetation regeneration and ecosystem stability.
theoretically stable ecosystem will enable it to withstand various disturbances and exhibit good resilience .
Table 2.
Five species with the highest IVI at all growth stages in Pematang Rahim Village Forest.
Growth stages Species RD (%) RF (%) Seedling Macaranga puncticulata Archidendron clypearia Horsfieldia irya Canarium sp.
Syzygium jambos Archidendron clypearia Macaranga puncticulata Syzygium jambos Horsfieldia irya Canarium sp.
Balakata baccata Horsfieldia irya Koompasia malaccensis Litsea machilifolia Elaeocarpus petiolatus Balakata baccata Litsea machilifolia Shorea palembanica Horsfieldia irya Koompasia malaccensis Sapling Poles Trees RD (%) IVI (%) After processing the vegetation analysis data, the values of various indices measured at the research location were determined.
The species richness index showed a high value for plant species richness at all growth The same results were also shown by the Shannon-Wiener diversity and evenness indices.
Figures http://dx.
org/10.
29244/jpsl.
JPSL, 14.
| 669
(Figure 4, 5, and .
also show that the values obtained are graded sequentially starting from the lowest.
starts at the seedling level, followed by the saplings, poles, and tree levels.
All measured indices show the same picture and describe the condition and structure of the plant vegetation at the study site.
Based on the measured index, it can be concluded that the vegetation condition in HDPR is rich in species diversity and number of individuals, is in a good and stable condition, and will ideally be able to survive in a sustainable manner if it is managed and maintained properly and no extraordinary events occur.
HDPR managers must try to maintain and continue to improve the HDPR peat forest ecosystem because it is the main selling point of ecotourism plans.
Reduced biodiversity has a negative effect on ecotourism and vice versa .
Growth Stages Trees Poles Sapling Seedling D Mg Index Value Figure 4.
Margalef Species Richness Index Value.
Growth Stages Trees Poles Sapling Seedling Index Value Figure 4.
Shannon-Wiener Species Diversity Index Value.
Growth Stages Trees Poles Sapling Seedling Index Value Figure 5.
Shannon-Wiener Evenness Index Value.
This journal is A Nursanti et al.
JPSL, 14.
| 670
Potential of Plants as Ecotourism Attractions Ecotourism provides an opportunity for tourists to recognize and contribute to the biodiversity and sociocultural richness of an area .
HDPR ecotourism management seeks to highlight the peat swamp forest ecosystem, which is still beautiful and dominated by large and shady trees or plants that can be eaten directly .
in the forest.
In addition, several types of plants at the research location are useful as sap or rubber producers, natural dye producers, and medicinal plants.
Based on the survey results of the observation plot and research location, there are several plants with distinctive values that can become ecotourism attractions.
Details are shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
Plants with potential for ecotourism attractions in Pematang Rahim Village Forest.
Potency Species Trunk and Shade Edible Campnosperma coriaceum.
Tetramerista glabra.
Balakata baccata.
Koompassia malacensis.
Litsea spp.
Shorea spp.
Ficus benjamina Beehive Tree Medicinal Plant Natural Dyes Rubber Canarium sp.
Archidendron clyperia.
Syzygium spp.
Artocarpus spp.
Santiria spp.
Durio sp.
Antidesma spp.
Koompassia malaccensis.
Canarium sp.
Shorea palembanica.
Gluta renghas Campnosperma auriculatum.
Goniothalamus macrophyllus.
Santiria laevigata.
Dillenia excels.
Macaranga triloba.
Litsea lancifolia.
Archidendron clypearia.
Sterculia cordata.
Artocarpus kemando.
Gynotroches axillaris.
Neonauclea calycina.
Madhuca motleyana.
Alseodaphne insignis Alstonia scholaris.
Litsea spp.
Archidendron clypearia.
Intsia palembanica.
Syzygium racemosum Alstonia scholaris.
Dyera costulata.
Artocarpus kemando.
Madhuca motleyana Several types of trees found in the HDPR are known to have medicinal potential.
Medang Keladi (Actinodaphne macrophyll.
whose stem bark is used as a diabetes medicine .
while the Medang Tai (Litsea sp1.
) leaves are used to treat back pain .
and in other Chinese medicines .
There are various types of trees that can be used as medicines in HDPR, which may be beneficial because there is a possibility that if plants with medicinal properties in the form of trees are introduced to the community, illegal logging activities or wood theft will be reduced, especially as some types of plants have medicinal properties and commercial types, such as Shorea sp.
and Litsea sp.
In addition to medicinal plants, several types of trees in HDPR can also be used to produce resin, sap, and edible fruits.
Jelutung Rawa/jelutong (Dyera costulat.
Pulai/milkwood tree (Alstonia scholari.
and Balam Suntai/butter tree (Madhuca motleyan.
are known to produce sap and have commercial value.
Jelutong sap has relatively high commercial value, because the sap can be used as a raw material for making chewing gum, insulators and varnish mixtures.
Apart from having commercial value, there is one type of tree whose sap can be used as a bird trap and a mixture of raw materials for making candles namely water cempedak/jackfruit tree (Artocarpus kemando Miq.
) .
Trees from the Dipterocarpaceae Family, such as Shorea spp.
, are known to produce resins .
The existence of trees with edible fruits can be an ecotourism attraction because this experience is very rare, especially in the wild.
In the HDPR, we also found several types of trees with fruits that could be eaten.
Some of these types include kedondong/ambarella fruit (Santiria oblongifoli.
, tampang/ambarella fruit (Santiria laevigat.
, samak dayak/star apple (Chrysophyllum sp.
), balam suntai/butter tree (Madhuca motleyan.
, cempedak air/jackfruit (Artocarpus kemand.
, and terap/breadfruit (Artocarpus odoratissimu.
Ae.
According to local information, the wood of olive tree (Sterculia cordat.
can also be eaten like cendol, and there is a species that can be used as a cooking ingredient, namely, the fruit of Asam Kumanjing/mangosteen tree (Garcinia sp.
Cendol wood is beneficial because it contains antioxidants and antibacterial agents .
Previously.
HDPR management built wooden gazebo and jungle tracks to become tourist attractions (Figure The existence of various individuals and distinctive plant species combined with wooden gazebos and jungle tracks can be a prime attraction for tourists visiting HDPR.
One of the management problems that has been previously identified is the lack of knowledge of managers and community villages regarding HDPR .
The knowledge of HDPR managers and the people of Pematang Rahim Village regarding the composition of HDPR must also be increased because it will be helpful in implementing sustainable ecotourism activities and providing benefits to all parties.
http://dx.
org/10.
29244/jpsl.
JPSL, 14.
| 671
Figure 6.
Jungle track and gazebo in Pematang Rahim Village Forest.
Conclusions The HDPR has the potential for flora diversity that can maintain the existing peat ecosystem and become a potential ecotourism attraction for the village.
This is illustrated by the high number of individuals and the richness of plant species, as well as the description of the stability of the ecosystem according to the IVI analysis.
Margalef Species richness index.
Shannon-Wiener diversity index, and Shannon-Wiener evenness index in all growth stages .
eedling, sapling, poles, and tree.
The various potential uses of these plants are clearly seen from the appearance of large stems/trunks and shady plants, plants that can be eaten directly .
, and plants that can become beehives as ecotourism attractions.
Author Contributions NST: Conceptualization.
Methodology.
Data Curation.
Writing - Review & Editing.
Supervision.
MU: Writing Review & Editing.
Project Administration.
Visualization.
ZS: Writing-Original Draft.
Resources.
Formal Analysis.
Validation.
Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements Our deepest gratitude goes to all those who have supported the implementation of this research, starting with students (Mirwandi.
Mike.
Dhyta, and Dore.
and administrators HDPR in field data collection, and the Andalas University Biology Department Herbarium for sample identification.
This research was funded by DIPA LPPM Jambi University in 2021 with the DIPA PNBP Research Institute and Community Service LPPM Integrated Research Village Research Scheme 2021 Fiscal Year Number SP DIPA-023.
677565/2021
November 23, 2020, in accordance with Research Contract Agreement No: 182/UN21.
11/PT01.
05/SPK/2021
May 7, 2021.
This journal is A Nursanti et al.
JPSL, 14.
| 672
References