Ay Omnibus Law Opportunities And Challenges Towards Entrepreneurs And Labor : Comparative Review lawAy June 27th 2020 THE 1st PROCEEDING International Conference And Call Paper Ay Omnibus Law Opportunities And Challenges Towards Entrepreneurs And Labor : Comparative Review lawAy IMAM ASAo SYAFEI BUILDING Faculty of Law.
Sultan Agung Islamic University Jalan Raya Kaligawe.
KM.
4 Semarang.
Indonesia Diterbitkan oleh :
UNISSULA PRESS
ISBN.
978-623-7097-74-7
The 6th Proceeding International Conference And Call Paper
Sultan Agung Islamic University COMITTE OF THE 6th PROCEEDING INTERNATIONAL
CONFERENCE AND CALL PAPER
Ay Omnibus Law Opportunities And Challenges Towards Entrepreneurs And Labor : Comparative ReviewAy Susunan Panitia Pengarah : Prof.
Dr.
Gunarto.
Akt.
Hum.
Penanggung Jawab : Dr.
Hj.
Anis Mashdurohatun.
Hum.
Ketua : Dr.
Hj.
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih.
,M.
Hum Sekretaris : Nailul Mukorrobin.
Psi Bendahara : Erna Sunarti,S.
Pd.
,M.
Hum Seksi Acara : Muhammad Ngazis.
Marcela Dinda.
Kom Shinta Puspita.
SE.
Seksi Konsumsi : Bambang Irawan Siti Pardiyah Riswanto Kesekertariatan : Slamet Ariyanto,S.
Agus Prayoga Reviewer : Prof.
Dr.
Eko Soponyono,SH.
,M.
Hum.
Prof.
Dr.
Hj.
I Gusti Ayu KRH.
SH.
,MM.
Hak Cipta A 2020, pada penulis Hak Publikasi pada penerbit UNISSULA PRESS Dilarang memperbanyak, memperbanyak sebagian atau seluruh isi dari buku ini dalam bentuk apapun, tanpa izin tertulis pada penerbit.
Hal I-IX, 1-258 Cetakan Pertama Tahun 2020 Penerbit UNISSULA PRESS Jl.
Raya Kaligawe Km.
4 Semarang 50112
PO BOX 1054/SM,
Telp.
Fax.
ISBN.
978-623-7097-74-7
Ay Omnibus Law Opportunities And Challenges Towards Entrepreneurs And Labor : Comparative Review lawAy i Editor :
Ngazis.
SH.
,MH
Erna Sunarti.
Pd.
,M.
Hum.
Nailul Mukorobin.
Psi.
Desain Cover :
Muh.
Arifin.
Kom Desain Lay Out :
Suryo Atmojo.
SH ISBN :
978-623-7097-74-7
Penerbit :
UNISSULA PRESS
Alamat :
Jl.
Raya Kaligawe KM.
4 PO.
Box.
1054/SM
Semarang 50112 Ae Indonesia Phone: 6224 6583584 .
Salura.
Fax.
Email : pdih.
fh@unissula.
id / w.
The 6th Proceeding International Conference And Call Paper Sultan Agung Islamic University KATA PENGANTAR Bismillahirrohmanirrohim AssalamuAoalaikum Wr.
Wb.
Puji syukur kehadirat Allah S.
Tuhan Semesta Alam Yang Maha Esa.
Alhamdulillah, sebagai ucapan syukur kehadirat Allah Subhanahu WataAoala kami dapat menyelenggarakan The 6nd Proceeding International Conference And Call Paper dengan tema AuOmnibus Law Opportunities And Challenges Towards Entrepreneurs And Labor : Comparative ReviewAy terselenggara dengan baik.
Pemilihan tema tersebut dipilih karena pada era searang ini kita dihadapkan dengan era industri 4.
0, dimana para kandidat doktor dituntut untuk bisa menyesuaikan dengan perkembangan global dan meningkatkan kompetensi keilmuan serta Pada seminar ini telah dipresentasikan hasil penelitian dosen dan mahasiswa yang diikuti oleh peneliti-peneliti dari berbagai universitas yang telah mebahas berbagai keilmuan Hukum dan Humaniora.
Sesungguhnya keberhasilan dalam mencapai tujuan pendidikan yang dicitacitakan sangat tergantung pada sikap mental, partisipasi serta disiplin setiap unsur yang terlibat dalam proses belajar mengajar.
Mudah-mudahan seminar Internasional yang sederhana ini dapat memberi sumbangsih dalam mencerdaskan bangsa Indonesia serta semoga Allah SWT selalu menyertakan ridho-Nya.
Amin.
Akhir kata, kami mengucapkan terima kasih kepada pimpinan Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, pimpinan fakultas Hukum Unissuala, pemakalah, editor dan serta pihak-pihak yang telah membantu terselenggaranya seminar ini dengan lancar tanpa hambatan suatu apapun.
WassalamuAoalaikum Wr.
Wb.
Ay Omnibus Law Opportunities And Challenges Towards Entrepreneurs And Labor : Comparative Review lawAy Table Of Content
STRENGTH AND WEAKNESSES OF OMNIBUS LAW IN INDONESIA
Saprodin.
Widarto .
OMNIBUS LAW BETWEEN JUSTICE AND BENEFITS
Hartanto .
Aris Sudarmono .
JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE FORMATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF
OMNIBUSLAW IN LAW SYSTEM
Amir Darmanto ,Muh.
Tommy Fadlurohman .
IMPACT OF LAW OMNIBUS APPLICATION IN INDONESIA IS POSSIBLY
HAPPENING TO ENVIRONMENT DEGRADATION
Sunarto ,Eva Kurniasih .
Omnibus Law in Progressive Law Views in Indonesia Nasrudin ,Joko Prasetyo .
OMNIBUS LAW WAS REVIEWED FROM THE EXCESS AND LACKS OF THE LEGAL
CODIFICATION SYSTEM IN INDONESIA
Binov Handitya ,Jarot Jati Bagus Suseno .
OMNIBUS LAW AS SIMPLIFICATION OF LEGISLATION IN INDONESIA
FA Alexander GS ,Sundoyo .
PREROGATIVE RIGHTS OF PRESIDENTS IN OMNIBUS LAW
Tri Mulyani ,Sih Ayuwatini .
OMNIBUS LAW AND ITAoS IMPLEMENTATION OF INDONESIAN COUNTRY MARITIME DEFENSE AND ISLAMIC LAW VIEWS ABOUT STATE DEFENSE Aminudin Yakub ,Teddy Prayoga .
OMNIBUS LAW AND PROBLEMATICS LABOR IN INDONESIA
Nukhbatul Mankhub .
Aep Saepudin2 .
OMNIBUS LAW IN INDIGENOUS LAW VIEWS IN INDONESIA
Carolina da Cruz ,Suwitno .
The 6th Proceeding International Conference And Call Paper Sultan Agung Islamic University OMNIBUS LAW IN RENEW OF CRIMINAL LAW Lukman Muhadjir ,Salidin .
URGENCY OF THE OMNIBUS LAW BILL
Andi Lala ,Sudiharto .
THE APPLICATION OF OMNIBUS LAW IN THE EFFECT OF LEGAL REFORM IN
INDONESIA
Warijan ,Tri Setyadi Artono .
OMNIBUS LAW IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT IN INDONESIA
Indrayana Addhywibowo Kusumawardana ,Iva Amiroch .
IMPLEMENTATION OF OMNIBUS LAW IN LAW OF WORK FIELD IN INDONESIA
Yimmy Kurniawan ,Henny Rosita .
OMNIBUS LAW OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN THE INDONESIAN
LEGISLATION SYSTEM
Yuni Nurkuntari ,Sunardi .
OMNIBUS LAW IN COMPLETION OF LAND REGULATION PROBLEMS
Enju Juanda.
Mairul .
LAW OF OMNIBUS LAW BUSINESS AGENCY FOR INDONESIAN COMMUNITY
WELFARE
Ilham Akbar ,Ahmad Husaini .
THE CONCEPT OF OMNIBUS LAW RELATED TO NORMAL LAW APPLICABLE IN
INDONESIA
Ariyanto ,Joncik Muhammad .
OMNIBUS LAW FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN INDONESIA
Adhi Budi Susilo ,Irwanto Efendi .
OMNIBUS LAW AND THE NEED OF INDONESIAN ECONOMIC INVESTMENTS
VIEWED FROM ISLAMIC LAW VIEWS RELATED TO ECONOMY
Ahmad Syauqy S ,Yanto Irianto .
Ay Omnibus Law Opportunities And Challenges Towards Entrepreneurs And Labor : Comparative Review lawAy VII
CRITICISM OF THE COMMUNITY IN THE OMNIBUS LAW BILL
Sitta Saraya ,Puguh Triatmojo .
MANIFESTATION OF PANCASILA VALUES IN THE OMNIBUS LAW FOR JUSTICE
Andri Winjaya Laksana.
LEGAL REVIEWOF LAW PROTECTION THEORY IMPLEMENTATION
IN DISPUTE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
Ahmad Yani.
OMNIBUS LAW ON JOB CREATION BILL IN THE ZEMIOLOGY PERSPECTIVE
Arif Awaludin.
Eti Mul Erowati.
Ninik Hartariningsih.
Application Of Omnibus Law In The Investment Field As A Efforts To The Settlement Licensing Regulation And Harmonization Of Law Regulation In Indonesia GaluhKartiko.
Ludfi AUAUDjajanto,Rosy ApriezaPuspita Zandra.
IDEAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A CONSTITUTIVE
SYSTEM (AuFIRST TO FILEA.
IN BRAND REGISTRATION Hani Subagio.
CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT AGAINSTPERPRETRATORS OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING
Johny Koesoema.
WEAKNESSES OF THE LEGISLATION FUNCTION OF THE REGIONAL
REPRESENTATIVE COUNCIL IN THE BICAMERAL PARLIAMENT SYSTEM IN
INDONESIA
Kelik Endro Suryono.
UTILIZATION OF VILLAGE FUNDS ACCORDING TO LAW NO.
6 OF 2014 TO
PREVENT CRIMINAL ACT OF CORRUPTION
Rohmidhi Srikusuma.
POTENTIALS OF NATURE TYPE AROUND BY THE ADVANCED: JURIDICAL
ANALYSIS OF LAW OMNIBUS LAW DRAFT OF LAW
Subaidah Ratna Juita.
Deni Setya Bagus Yuherawan .
The 6th Proceeding International Conference And Call Paper
Sultan Agung Islamic University MEDIATION ROLE IN SOLVING SHARIA ECONOMIC DISPUTE AS CIVILIZATION
TOWARD ETHICAL VALUE OF ISLAM
Santoso.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONFOR CHILDREN UNDER
THE AGE OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY BASED ON JUSTICE VALUE
Yustinus Bowo Dwinugrono.
Re-Conceptualizing WorkersAo Constitutional Rights in the Cipta Kerja Bill based on the Indonesian Welfare State Principles Zulkarnain Ridlwan.
Yuswanto.
Muhtadi.
Yusdiyanto.
Ay Omnibus Law Opportunities And Challenges Towards Entrepreneurs And Labor : Comparative Review lawAy OMNIBUS LAW IN INDIGENOUS LAW VIEWS IN INDONESIA Carolina da Cruz1 Doctorate Student of Faculty of Law Sultan Agung Islamic University Semarang.
Indonesia linacruz4492@gmail.
Suwitno2
1,2,
Doctorate Student of Faculty of Law Sultan Agung Islamic University Semarang.
Indonesia polri@gmail.
1,2,
ABSTRACT
Omnibus law Bill of Employment Creation contains many problems in many ways, from legal conventions to sectored articles.
More and more criticism is directed at the omnibus law, a draft regulation that aims and simplifies overlapping rules.
In Indonesia, the Cipta Karya omnibus law will be used to facilitate The government under President Joko Widodo believes that the overlapping of regulations makes investments not go in so that the economy does not go fast.
In writing this paper, the problem is how is Omnibus Law viewed from the view of customary law in Indonesia?Omnibus law is a product of the Act that can revoke or amend several existing laws that can be scattered in several regulations, then streamlined in one Act to better target the solution to a conflict between government administrators and regulations legislation with specific objectives to improve the investment climate and as a guarantee of legal certainty and legal protection for policy makers.
In the hierarchy / sequence of laws and regulations in Indonesia, the concept of Omnibus Law has not been included as a principle in legal sources, but harmonization of laws and regulations in Indonesia is continuously carried out to minimize conflict of laws and regulations.
The assumptions and perspectives on the problem are not comprehensive, such that since the beginning of the idea of AUAUforming the Omnibus Law, the Government has failed to examine the facts that occur in the field and also failed to put the Indigenous Peoples in the right position.
Excessive worship of large scale investment so far has shown facts that are very detrimental to Indigenous Peoples.
On top of this worship, customary territories were seized and then given permission to invest in the forestry, plantation, mining and other Keywords : omnibus law, customary law
INTRODUCTION
Article 1 paragraph .
of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia explicitly states that.
AuThe State of Indonesia is a state of law.
Ay As a consequence of the mandate of the constitution.
Indonesia wants to adhere to the concept of the rule of law in carrying out all aspects of the life of the state.
The key word for rechtsstaat is the existence of a basic norm which underlies the creation of laws in Ay Omnibus Law Opportunities And Challenges Towards Entrepreneurs And Labor : Comparative Review lawAy the territory of the Unitary Republic of Indonesia, and of course the basic norm that we all know is Pancasila.
This was also reinforced by SoepomoAos13 statement which said that Auby understanding the integral nature of law, where the state as the organizer of justice for the whole people, then we will be able to carry out aunified and just Indonesian State, as already contained in the Panca DharmaAy14.
Then.
Soepomo continued.
Authen the state can only be fair, if the country carries out a sense of justice for the people and leads the people to noble ideals, according to the flow of the timesAy15.
The realization of SoepomoAos statement is clearly stated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 27, 31 and 32.
In essence, the State adheres to a social justice system that is kinship in nature, which is clarified in article 32 regarding the care of neglected children and the poor by the state.
Next go back to article 31 which states that the economic system is composed by joint efforts based on the principle of kinship as well, which demands that natural resources be controlled by the state for the common interest as extended families.
In the end, to formulate laws in each region, it should always be done with a system of consultation in accordance with the 4th principle of Pancasila16.
Apart from what Soepomo had formulated normatively.
The spirit of the judicial law in Indonesia must be at least in accordance with, first, law enforcement that breathes on divine values.
Second, law enforcement in Indonesia is not only fair but also civilized.
Third.
Indonesian law enforcement underlies its decision on considerations that are concerned with national unity.
Fourth.
Indonesian law enforcement cannot be one-sided, but must go through dynamic and wise deliberations.
Fifth.
Indonesian law enforcement must be equitable in the overall spectrum (Vivendi mod.
, not beneficial to either party.
That has been stated above shows that Indonesian law does not refer to a formal-positive truth.
Indonesian law must also pay attention to the realities that live in society.
Indonesian law is actually a law like Holmes said that legal life .
has not been logic, it has been experience.
Law is a legal regulatory instrument in the rule of law.
The main purpose of the law according to Mochtar Kusumaatmadja is the guarantee of order, justice and certainty17.
Thus, law is a system that has characteristics and characteristics that become the driving force and regulator of peopleAos lives.
The law manifests in the form of laws and regulations, a set of written laws in various forms that govern all aspects of state and community life.
According to Mahfud MD, statutory regulations are all laws in the broadest sense that are formed in a certain way by the authorized official and stated in written form18.
As for the phenomenon regarding the laws and regulations that are now surfacing and drawing debate, when the government submits the Draft Bill on the Employment Copyright to the House of Representatives19.
The debate over this arose not without reason, because the Draft Bill on Employment Copyright was formed by the government through the Omnibus Law.
Not only that, even of the 50 Draft Laws included in the 2020 National Legislation Program (Prolegna.
, four of them are omnibus law which consists of a Bill on the Body compiler of the 1945 Constitution passed cumlaude at the University of Leiden, the Netherlands.
Yudi Latif.
Negara Paripurna.
(Jakarta : Kompas Gramedia, 2.
What Pancha Darma meant by Soepomo were the five guidelines for Chuo Sangi InAos life.
15 Ibid hlm 530 Bakhrul Amal.
Paradigma Hukum (Suatu Pengantar Dalam Memahami Perilaku Manusia Terhadap Huku.
December 2013 Mochtar Kusumaatmadja.
Konsep-Konsep Pembangunan Hukum dalam Pembangunan, (Bandung: Alumni, 2.
, p.
18 Mahfud MD.
Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2.
, p.
19 CNBC Indonesia, https://w.
com/news/20200212114420-4- 137233/hari-ini-draft-omnibus-law-Cipta Lapangan Kerja-diserahkan-ke-dpr The 6th Proceeding International Conference And Call Paper Sultan Agung Islamic University State Capital, a Bill on Pharmaceuticals, a Bill on Copyright on Employment, and a Bill on Provisions and Tax Facilities for Strengthening the Economy20.
The Aoomnibus lawAo system prioritizes and idealizes writing and drafting, in addition to being integrated, also harmonious with various legal materials governing subjects and objects that differ from other laws in one united system of a rule of law state based on the constitution as the highest source of law .
The system that is currently practiced in Indonesia, is a codification system, but is limited to the codification of legislation containing material cohesiveness as long as it is related to a thematic subject and object, which cannot reach matters relating to other themes or topics.
The Problem The problem in writing this paper is how is Omnibus Law viewed from the view of customary law in Indonesia? Methods of Research The method of approach in this study uses the type of normative juridical research.
Normative juridical research is research focused on studying the application of rules or norms in positive law.
This type of research is a type of qualitative descriptive research, because in this study describes the situation that occurs at present in a systematic and factual manner with the aim to explain and the resolution of the problem under study, the Omnibus Law in terms of the view of customary law in Indonesia.
Primary data obtained by researchers refers to data or facts and legal cases obtained directly through library studies relating to research objects and practices that can be seen and related to research objects.
The data analysis method used is normative qualitative, namely the decomposition of data analysis which starts with the information obtained to achieve clarity of the problem to be discussed Research Result and Discussion The definition of Omnibus Law starts from the word Omnibus.
The word Omnibus comes from the Latin language and means for everything.
In the Black Law Dictionary Ninth Edition Bryan A.
Garner mentioned the omnibus: relating to or dealing with numerous objects or items at once.
including many things or having various purposes, meaning that it is related to or dealing with various objects or items at including many things or having various goals.
When coupled with the word Law, it can be defined as a law that has a variety of related objects / items or all related.
According to Sofyan Djalil in the article w.
com on February 16, 2017, who was then serving as Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning / Head of the National Land Agency, has proposed the concept of Omnibus Law in the procedure for managing or checking the status of land According to him, the concept of omnibus law is a step to issue a law that can improve so many laws that have been considered to overlap and hamper the process of ease of business .
mnibus la.
With the issuance of one Law to amend many Laws, because with so many Acts it cannot be accelerated because many Acts still regulate and can contradict each other.
From the description of the legal experts opinions above, the main characteristics of the Omnibus Law can be drawn are .
it consists of multiple sectors or consists of many sectors with the same theme.
consists of many articles, due to the many sectors covered.
independent or independent, without being bound or minimally bound by other regulations.
negate / revoke parts and / or all other regulations.
CNN Indonesia, https://w.
com/nasional/20200122164312-32- 467714/4-ruu-omnibus-law-dikebut-dpr Ay Omnibus Law Opportunities And Challenges Towards Entrepreneurs And Labor : Comparative Review lawAy In addition, it can also be known that the goals raised by the Omnibus Law ideas are .
to resolve conflict of laws and regulations quickly, effectively and efficiently.
standardize government policies both at the central and regional levels to support the investment climate.
that licensing management is more integrated, efficient and effective.
to break the long chain of administrative bureaucracy.
to improve the coordination relationship between related agencies because it has been regulated in an integrated omnibus regulation policy.
as a guarantee of legal certainty and protection for policy makers.
Examining this Omnibus law can not only be viewed from the Legitimacy Aspect of Laws and Regulations.
We can also approach the Omnibus Law Concept through Legal Theory, namely21:
Omnibus law Bill of Employment Creation contains many problems in many ways from legal conventions to sectored articles.
More and more criticism is directed at the omnibus law, a draft regulation that aims and simplifies overlapping rules.
In Indonesia, the Cipta Karya omnibus law will be used to facilitate investment.
The government under President Joko Widodo believes that the overlapping of regulations makes investments not go in so that the economy does not go fast.
The Work Draft Bill (RUU) is one of the omnibus laws whose designs have been submitted to the House of Representatives.
Collecting 79 legislation under way, the Work Creation Bill contains 1,224 articles with a thickness of more than 1,000 pages.
The Association for Community-Based and Ecological Legal Reform (Hum.
that reviews the Cipta Karya Bill found several fundamental flaws.
For example, from all of the clusters, the Cipta Karya Bill is not in accordance with the conventions or rules on making laws that have been used in Indonesia.
The Work Cipta Bill does not refer to the object it wishes to regulate, such as other laws and regulations such as the Forestry Law, the Food Law, the Defense Law.
The name of the Work Cipta Karya Bill refers to the results and ideals or expectations to be achieved from the articles contained in it, which is to present as much investment as possible.
So if investment does not increase and employment is not created, this law can be said to be a failure.
Formally and the Work Cipta Bill process is not in accordance with the law.
The first result of the Cipta Karya Bill which only simplifies is most pronounced in the regulation of indigenous peoples.
Not only does it contradict the 2012 Constitutional Court ruling stating that customary forests are excluded from state forests, the CiptaKerja Bill even includes various definitions and definitions of indigenous peoples.
There are 72 articles in the Work Creation Bill that mention customary law communities with all its variants: customary law communities, indigenous peoples, traditional communities, local wisdom, customary rights, traditional rights, customary territories, customary management areas, and so on.
The differences in the designation show that the Work Draft Bill is not a codified law, but merely takes customary affairs out of various existing laws and was drafted by many government agencies.
So far, indigenous peoples are governed by many institutions by many rules with different definitions.
For this reason, it can be said that the Work Cipta Bill has deviated from the goal to be achieved by the government in making an omnibus law that is synchronizing sectored rules to facilitate investment.
The Cipta Karya Bill failed to harmonize excuses with reality.
As a result, the Cipta Karya Bill is not a solution.
the Cipta Karya Bill cannot solve the complicated problem of indigenous peoples, namely overlapping permits in their area, especially with industries that are given the right by the government to manage an area.
Even its contents make vulnerable the seizure of indigenous territories.
From terminology, omnibus means a large bus that carries many people who walk Hamidi.
Sugiharto.
, & Ihsan.
Membedah Teori-Teori Hukum Kontemporer.
Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Nonet.
, & Selznick.
Hukum Responsif.
Cetakan II.
Nusa Media.
Bandung.
The 6th Proceeding International Conference And Call Paper Sultan Agung Islamic University to the same destination.
In the case of the Cipta Karya omnibus, the aim is to attract as much investment as Therefore, this bill will cut anything that impedes that goal.
Indigenous peoples considered to have the same goals as other passengers in attracting investment.
So far, indigenous peoples have been considered as obstacles to investment because they often conflict with industry due to overlapping permits.
Therefore, it is not surprising that the Work Draft Bill has no intention of resolving this serious problem, which has an impact on the environment.
At first the public learned that the Omnibus Law, which was being drafted secretly, was called the Employment Copyright Bill or abbreviated as the Employment Copyright Bill.
Civil society groups immediately reacted to the Omnibus Law Draft mainly because of its elitist and much closed formulation Shortly after, this draft was renamed the CiptaKerja Bill.
Once explored, it was immediately known that the Omnibus Law Draft was indeed worthy of bearing the name of the Employment Copyright Bill because it was found that its substance had the potential to harm Indigenous Peoples and the environment.
The impression is that the Proposed Omnibus Law on Employment Copyright for investment and neglect of the recognition and protection of Indigenous PeoplesAo rights cannot be covered up.
This attitude is demonstrated by ways of removing, adding, or re-interpreting the provisions in at least 79 existing laws.
The steps of elimination, addition, or re-interpretation are carried out to serve one goal, which is to Aufacilitate investmentAy, so as to create broad employment opportunities for the people, and to boost the stagnant national economy lately.
One of the issues highlighted and described on page 118 of the Academic Paper on the CK Bill explains that one of the current problems is Authe difficulty of obtaining land in investing in Indonesia, there is a disharmony between the Spatial Planning Law, the Basic Agrarian Law, the Law on Agrarian Affairs, the Law Forestry and other sector laws Au.
At a glance the description in the Omnibus Law Cipta Karya does not look wrong.
But the analysis of the various conflicts and violence experienced by Indigenous Peoples as a result of the seizure of indigenous territories has led us to the conclusion that without waving a green flag and stretching the red carpet to investment despite the fact that so far the state has shown a pro attitude and practice on investment and ignoring the protection of Indigenous Peoples and customary territories and the natural resources contained That is, it is the Indigenous People who should be more worthy of shouting about the disharmony of the various existing laws and regulations.
The assumptions and perspectives on the problem are not comprehensive, such that since the beginning of the idea of forming AUAU the Omnibus Law, the Government has failed to examine the facts that occur in the field and also failed to put the Indigenous Peoples in the right position.
Excessive worship of large scale investment so far has shown facts that are very detrimental to Indigenous Peoples.
On top of this worship, customary territories were seized and then given permission to invest in the forestry, plantation, mining and other sectors.
The Omnibus Law on Employment Copyright clearly contradicts the recognition and protection of Indigenous Peoples that have been regulated in the 1945 Constitution.
One proof is the abolition of provisions in the Environmental Protection and Management Law which exclude cultivation activities by burning as an expression of the traditional wisdom of Indigenous Peoples from criminal threats.
The abolition of the exclusion article clearly shows anti-state attitudes which clearly threaten indigenous peoples and their traditional wisdom in managing their customary territories.
Not only farming activities by burning, the absence of protection of indigenous territories will actually have an impact on the increasingly massive seizure of indigenous territories for investment purposes.
And this will have an impact on the loss of various traditional Indigenous occupations .
arming, fishermen.
Ay Omnibus Law Opportunities And Challenges Towards Entrepreneurs And Labor : Comparative Review lawAy honey collectors, incense, etc.
) and have a further impact on the loss of Indigenous PeoplesAo identities.
Thus, the Omnibus Law on Employment Copyright is not only openly contradictory to the recognition and protection of the Constitution for Indigenous Peoples as stipulated in Article 18 B paragraph .
and Article 28 paragraph .
of the 1945 Constitution but also shows an attitude contrary to the law Human rights in particular ILO Convention 111/1958 which regulates and provides guarantees for Indigenous Peoples to carry out work traditionally or hereditary in their care, which by the ILO Convention 111 is called traditional Furthermore, seizure of indigenous territories is also a violation of the CERD Convention.
Both conventions have been ratified by the Government of Indonesia.
Conclusion Omnibus law is a product of the Act that can revoke or amend several existing laws that can be scattered in several regulations, then streamlined in one Act to better target the solution to a conflict between government administrators and regulations legislation with specific objectives to improve the investment climate and as a guarantee of legal certainty and legal protection for policy makers.
In the hierarchy / sequence of laws and regulations in Indonesia, the concept of Omnibus Law has not been included as a principle in legal sources, but harmonization of laws and regulations in Indonesia is continuously carried out to minimize conflict of laws and regulations.
Assumptions and perspectives on issues that are not comprehensive, as from the very beginning the idea of AUAUestablishing the Omnibus Law, the Government has failed to examine the facts that occur in the field and also failed to put the Indigenous Peoples in the right position.
The draft Omnibus Law Employment Copyright clearly contradicts the recognition and protection of Indigenous Peoples that have been regulated in the 1945 Constitution.
Suggestion The DPR RI and the Government should prioritize discussion and ratification of the Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples into Law.
As an alternative, an understanding of executive codification can also be developed, namely that the compilation of an integrated text, which is harmonious with various other laws, is carried out by the government with reference to all laws and even other legislation that are interrelated to one another.
Others, both directly and indirectly, with a view to facilitating the subject of regulated law and all the people to seek justice and find the truth of the law.
References