Journal of Research.
Review and Educational Innovation Volume 2 Nomor 1 2024, page: 34 - 51 STKIP PGRI Situbonod @2024 DOI.
https://doi.
org/10.
47668/jrrei.
LITERATURE REVIEW: IMPLEMENTATION OF A DECISION
SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING SCHOLARSHIP
RECIPIENTS
Anis Febriyanti1.
AsAoad2.
Zainol Abrori3.
Herman Felani4.
Firman Jaya5* 1,2,3,4,5 STKIP PGRI Situbondo.
Indonesia e-mail: altamis1922@gmail.
Abstract: Scholarships are a form of support or appreciation given to individuals, generally for those who wish to continue their education but have economic limitations or for those who excel.
A system is needed to determine worthy scholarship recipients to support decision-making.
This research aims to identify the impact of a decision support system (DSS) in selecting scholarship recipients using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method.
This research collected 15 journals from Google Scholar published from 2020 to 2024, which were analyzed based on (Quality Assessmen.
such as topic relevance, use of methods and criteria, and the impact of implementing a decision support system on determining scholarship recipients.
The results of the analysis show that the implementation of a decision support system has a significant impact on selecting scholarship recipients who are transparent, effective, efficient, and accurate.
Keywords: Article Review.
Decision Support System.
Scholarship Recipients Copyright .
2023 The Authors.
This is an open-access article under the CC BY-SA 4.
0 license .
ttps://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by-sa/4.
INTRODUCTION
According to Pristiwanti et al.
, .
education is a learning process that aims to develop individual potential as a whole.
Through education, humans gain the knowledge, skills, values, and attitudes needed to live in society.
Education has a vital role in human life.
Education opens doors of opportunity for individuals to achieve their goals and improve their quality of life.
Education also plays a role in shaping individual character, developing critical thinking skills, and fostering a sense of love for the country (Sukmayadi et al.
, 2.
addition, education is also a means to preserve the nation's culture and noble values.
With quality education, it is expected to give birth to a young generation that is intelligent, creative, characterized, and able to face global challenges (Maisaroh & Untari.
However, pursuing education to a higher level is often a big challenge, especially for individuals who come from families with economic limitations, as a solution to these challenges (Yasin et al.
, 2.
Scholarships exist as a form of financial support that facilitates access to education for those who have academic potential but are constrained by economic limitations (El-Yunusi et al.
, 2.
Scholarships are a form of financial support given to individuals to continue their Scholarships can be provided by the government, private institutions, universities, or other organizations (Irianto et al.
, 2.
According to Meiriza et al.
, .
the main purpose of providing scholarships is to provide opportunities for those who have academic potential but are constrained by financial problems to get higher education.
Scholarships become a bridge for individuals to achieve their goals through education.
With scholarships, many young people who excel but come from underprivileged families can continue their studies to a higher level.
This has a positive impact not only on the individuals who receive the scholarship, but also on society at large (Sari & Yasin, 2.
Each scholarship program has specific selection requirements to determine the recipients who best meet the criteria (Surati et al.
, 2.
According to Naya et al.
, .
the manual selection process takes a long time, especially in verifying documents such as salary slips, transcripts, certificates of inability, and other documents needed in accordance with the scholarship requirements.
The number of criteria that need to be considered and the limited selection time, coupled with the non-optimal utilization of computer equipment, often makes data management inefficient and prone to errors.
Thus, to select eligible scholarship recipients, a system is needed that can help the decision- making process such as a decision support system (Al Harits & Al Majid.
According to Handoko .
decision support systems (DSS) have become an increasingly important tool in the scholarship recipient selection process.
With an increasing number of scholarship applicants and increasingly complex criteria, decision support systems (DSS) offer efficient and objective solutions.
Meanwhile.
According to Ilham et al.
, .
decision support system (DSS) works by processing data on prospective scholarship recipients based on various predetermined criteria, such as academic achievement, socioeconomic background, and contribution potential.
Through certain algorithms, the decision support system (DSS) then produces a ranking of prospective scholarship recipients based on the scores obtained (Ramadhan & Noviyanto, 2.
This allows scholarship awarding institutions to make more accurate and transparent decisions, and minimize the potential for bias in the selection process.
Thus, a decision support system (DSS) can help ensure that scholarships are awarded to the most deserving and needy candidates (Jamung et al.
, 2.
Recently, the application of decision support systems (DSS) has increasingly become a popular topic in the scholarship acceptance selection process (Amaliah, 2.
Several studies have revealed that the use of a decision support system (SPK) can affect the scholarship acceptance process.
The purpose of this study is to identify the effect of the implementation of a decision support system (SPK) in the process of determining scholarship To find out how the impact of using a decision support system (SPK) on the scholarship acceptance process, researchers applied the systematic literature review (SLR) method by collecting 15 journals published in the last 5 years from Google Scholar for METHOD This research uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, which is a research method carried out systematically and objectively to collect, evaluate, and synthesize relevant evidence from various previously published literature sources (Suciati et , 2.
The literature selected based on keywords that are by the research focus is then reviewed and identified in a structured manner by the stages set out in the SLR method (Anggraeni et al.
, 2.
In this study, the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method used three stages as described by Farah Faadillah Herindraningrum and Indrawati Yuhertiana.
Figure 1.
Stages of the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) Method .
In preparing a research article using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, the first stage is planning.
At this stage, questions relevant to the research topic are The following is the Research Question (RQ) used in this study:
Research Question (RQ) 1: What methods and criteria are used in the implementation of decision support systems in determining scholarship recipients? Research Question (RQ) 2: Does the journal explain the impact of implementing a decision support system on the process of determining scholarship recipients? The second stage in the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method is conducting.
this stage, a search process is carried out to obtain sources that are relevant to the Research Question (RQ).
Source searches are carried out using Google Scholar through the website https://scholar.
id/ using keywords in the form of "Decision Support System" and "Determination of Scholarship Recipients", then Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria are carried out where at this stage the criteria of the data found are determined to determine its eligibility as a research data source.
The following are the criteria that make data considered suitable as a research source: "The data collected covers the period between 2020 - 2024", "Data taken from Google Scholar sources", "The data used is limited to journals relevant to the topic of decision support systems in determining scholarship recipients".
Next, a Quality Assessment (QA) is carried out, the aim is to find out whether the journals obtained match the desired criteria and answer the research question (RQ).
At this stage, the data that has been found will be evaluated based on the following questions: QA1: The journal was published between 2020 and 2024.
QA2: The journal explains the methods and criteria used in the implementation of the decision support system for determining scholarship recipients.
QA 3:
The journal discusses the impact of the implementation of the decision support system on the process of determining scholarship recipients.
Each journal will be given a score based on predetermined questions using "Yes" for journals that meet the criteria in Quality Assessment (QA) and "No" for journals that do not meet the criteria in Quality Assessment (QA).
The final stage in the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method is reporting, where the results of the analysis and evaluation of the review of various journals are compiled in writing by the established format, where this stage is a discussion of the answers to each research question (RQ).
RESULT
Search Process Results and Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria The result of the Search Process and Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria is the selection of 15 journals that meet the criteria, namely journals published between 2020 and 2024, and discuss the topics of "Decision Support Systems" and "Determination of Scholarship Recipients".
Furthermore, the journals were grouped into several categories.
The following are the types of journals that were successfully obtained:
No.
No.
Table 1.
Journal Grouping Based on Type
Journal Type
Jurnal Teknologi Informasi
Jurnal Tekno Kompak
Jurnal Nasional Komputasi dan Teknologi Informasi
(JNKTI)
JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Journal Type Informas.
Jurnal Data Mining Dan Sistem Informasi Jurnal Tekinkom (Teknik Informasi dan Kompute.
Jurnal Teknologi Dan Ilmu Komputer Prima (Jutikom.
JIKA (Jurnal Informatik.
TIN: Terapan Informatika Nusantara
The Indonesian Journal of Computer Science Jurnal Nasional Komputasi dan Teknologi Informasi
(JNKTI)
Jurnal Teknoinfo SATESI : Jurnal Sains Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi Jurnal Ilmiah SINUS Jurnal Lebesgue: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika.
Matematika Dan Statistika Year Total Year Total Quality Assessment (QA) Results The Quality Assessment (QA) in this study is as follows:
Quality Assessment (QA) 1: The journal was published between 2020 and 2024.
Quality Assessment (QA) 2: The journal explains the methods and criteria used in the implementation of the decision support system for determining scholarship recipients.
Quality Assessment (QA) 3: The journal discusses the impact of implementing a decision support system on the process of determining scholarship recipients.
The Quality Assessment (QA) assessment is presented in the following table:
No.
Table 2.
Quality Assessment (QA) Results Author and Year
Quality Assessment (QA) QA 1
QA 2
QA 3
Yusni Amaliah.
Suprianto .
Yes Yes Yes Rasyid Ridho.
Hairani Hairani.
Yes Yes Yes Kurniadin Abd Latif.
Rifqi Hammad .
Bahrin.
Betrisandi.
Maryam Yes Yes Yes Diange .
Sukamto.
Yanti Andriyani.
Ayu Yes Yes Yes Lestari .
Debby Alita.
Indah Sari.
Auliya Yes Yes Yes Rahman Isnain.
Styawati .
Betaria Sonata Sianturi.
Volvo Yes Yes Yes Sihombing.
Ibnu Rasyid Munthe .
Results Accepted Accepted Accepted Accepted Accepted Accepted No.
Rifa Nurafiah Syabaniah.
Author and Year Agung Wibowo.
Eva Marsusanti.
Nani Purwati.
Rina Riniawati .
Sari Susanti.
Galih Repor Nawangsit .
Desfa Anisa.
Widya Septya Ningrum.
Retno Kusumo.
Widya Putri .
Budy Satria.
Acihmah Sidauruk.
Raditya Wardhana.
Abdussalam Al Akbar.
Arinal Ihsan .
Amin Syifa.
Darmawan Aditama.
Indra Gita Anugrah .
Rizal.
Hafizh Al Kautsar Aidilof.
Ali Imran Nasution .
Nikomedes Oba Rendu.
Kristina Sara.
Anastasia Mude .
Sri Surati.
Sri Siswanti.
Andriani Kusumaningrum .
Ahmad Al A Dhomul Aflahin.
Ivan Ariful Fathoni.
Festian Cindrabumi .
Yes
Yes
Yes
Quality Assessment (QA) QA 1
QA 2
QA 3
Accepted Results Yes Yes Yes Accepted Yes Yes Yes Accepted Yes Yes Yes Accepted Yes Yes Yes Accepted Yes Yes Yes Accepted Yes Yes Yes Accepted Yes Yes Yes Accepted Yes Yes Yes Accepted Based on the results of the Quality Assessment (QA) assessment in Table 2 above, it can be concluded that 15 journals are by the statements in the Quality Assessment (QA) that have been determined.
As for the results of the literature review that has been carried out, the researchers write it into the table as follows:
No.
Title Table 3.
Previous Research Methods Name Methods Decision Support System for Poor Scholarship Recipients Yusni Amaliah.
Suprianto .
This research uses the Multi-Objective Optimization based on Ratio (MOORA) method Combination of AHP and TOPSIS Methods for Recommending SMK Scholarship Title Rasyid Ridho.
Hairani Hairani.
Kurniadin Abd This research utilizes a combination of two methods.
AHP and TOPSIS Recipients Based on Decision Support System Latif.
Rifqi Hammad No.
Name Methods Poor Achievement Scholarship Selection Decision Support System with Composite Performance Index (CPI) Method Decision Support System for Bidikmisi Scholarship Recipients Using the SMART Method Bahrin.
Betrisandi.
Maryam Diange .
The method applied in this research is the Composite Performance Index (CPI) Sukamto.
Yanti Andriyani.
Ayu Lestari .
In this research, the decision-making system method used is SMART Application of Nayve Bayes Classifier for Scholarship Recipient Decision Support Debby Alita.
Indah Sari.
Auliya Rahman Isnain.
Styawati .
The method used for decisionmaking in this research is Nayve Bayes Classifier Decision Support System for Determining Scholarship Recipients Using the ELECTRE Method Decision Support System for Selection of Tahfidz Scholarship Candidates Using SAW Method Betaria Sonata Sianturi.
Volvo Sihombing.
Ibnu Rasyid Munthe .
Rifa Nurafiah Syabaniah.
Agung Wibowo.
Eva Marsusanti.
Nani Purwati.
Rina Riniawati .
Sari Susanti.
Galih Repor Nawangsit The decision support system method used in this research is ELECTRE Desfa Anisa.
Widya Septya Ningrum.
Retno Kusumo.
Widya Putri .
The method used in selecting scholarships in this study is Weighted Product Application of Composite Performance Index (CPI) as a Method on Scholarship Recipient Title Budy Satria.
Acihmah Sidauruk.
Raditya Wardhana.
Abdussalam Al Name This research uses the Composite Performance Index (CPI) as a decision support system method Methods Selection Decision Support System Akbar.
Arinal Ihsan .
No.
Application of the Tsukamoto Fuzzy Method to the Decision Support System for Determining Scholarship Awards Scholarship Acceptance Decision Support System Using Weighted Product Method This research uses the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) In this research, the Fuzzy Tsukamoto method is used as an algorithm in determining the decision-making system Decision Support System for Bidikmisi Scholarship Recipients at Muhammadiyah Gresik University with the WASPAS Method Decision Support System for Academic Achievement Scholarship Acceptance Using Preference Selection Index Application of Promethee Method in Scholarship Acceptance Decision Support System Amin Syifa.
Darmawan Aditama.
Indra Gita Anugrah The Weighted Aggregated Sum Product assessment (WASPAS) method was used in this study Rizal.
Hafizh Al Kautsar Aidilof.
Ali Imran Nasution .
In this research, the decision support system method applied is Preference Selection Index (PSI) Nikomedes Oba Rendu.
Kristina Sara.
Anastasia Mude In this research, the Promethee method is used for the decision support system Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Method for Decision Support System Scholarship Recipient Determination Application of Decision Support System (SPK) by Using Fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Proces.
Method as Determination of PIP Scholarship Acceptance Sri Surati.
Sri Siswanti.
Andriani Kusumaningrum The Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) method is a system method of decision support used in this Ahmad Al A Dhomul Aflahin.
Ivan Ariful Fathoni.
Festian Cindrabumi .
This research uses the SPK method in the form of the Fuzzy AHP method Table 4.
Use of Previous Research Criteria No.
Title Decision Support System for Poor Scholarship Recipients Using the MOORA Method Yusni Amaliah.
Suprianto .
Combination of AHP Rasyid Ridho.
No.
Name Criteria The criteria used included area, type of house floor, type of house wall, type of house roof.
WC, electricity, water, transportation, and parents' The criteria used include Title Name Criteria and TOPSIS Methods for Recommendation of SMK Scholarship Recipients Based on Decision Support System Hairani Hairani.
Kurniadin Abd Latif.
Rifqi Hammad .
grade point average, parental income, parental dependents, distance of residence.
Poor Achievement Scholarship Selection Decision Support System with Composite Performance Index (CPI) Method Decision Support System for Bidikmisi Scholarship Recipients Using the SMART Method Bahrin.
Betrisandi.
Maryam Diange .
The criteria used included subject matter expertise, responsibility, creativity, and Sukamto.
Yanti Andriyani.
Ayu Lestari .
Application of Nayve Bayes Classifier for Scholarship Recipient Decision Support Decision Support System for Determining Scholarship Recipients Using the ELECTRE Method Debby Alita.
Indah Sari.
Auliya Rahman Isnain.
Styawati .
Betaria Sonata Sianturi.
Volvo Sihombing.
Ibnu Rasyid Munthe .
Decision Support System for Selection of Tahfidz Scholarship Candidates Using SAW Method Application of the Tsukamoto Fuzzy Method to the Decision Support System for Determining Scholarship Awards Rifa Nurafiah Syabaniah.
Agung Wibowo.
Eva Marsusanti.
Nani Purwati.
Rina Riniawati .
Sari Susanti.
Galih Repor Nawangsit The criteria used include GPA score, total parental income, father's occupation, mother's occupation, and number of The criteria used include report card grade point average, parents' income, and number of siblings The criteria used include grade point average, parental income, number of parental and number of student The criteria used include the amount of memorization, tajweed, makhorijul huruf, and poor family status Scholarship Acceptance Decision Support Desfa Anisa.
Widya Septya Ningrum.
The criteria used included parents' occupation, parents' No.
Title System Using Weighted Product Method Name Retno Kusumo.
Widya Putri .
Criteria income, number of parents' mounts and average report card score Application of Composite Performance Index (CPI) as a Method on Scholarship Recipient Selection Decision Support System Budy Satria.
Acihmah Sidauruk.
Raditya Wardhana.
Abdussalam Al Akbar.
Arinal Ihsan .
The criteria used include parents' income.
GPA, electricity consumption, and The criteria used include average final school grades, general knowledge achievements and nonacademic championship No.
No.
Decision Support System for Bidikmisi Scholarship Recipients at Muhammadiyah Gresik University with the WASPAS Method Decision Support System for Upgrading Scholarship Acceptance Academic Achievement Using the Preference Selection Index Application of Promethee Method in Scholarship Acceptance Decision Support System Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Method for Scholarship Recipient Determination Decision Support System Application of Decision Support System (SPK) by Using Fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Proces.
Method as Determination of PIP Scholarship Acceptance Amin Syifa.
Darmawan Aditama.
Indra Gita Anugrah The criteria used include grade point average, parental income, parental dependents, distance of residence.
Rizal.
Hafizh Al Kautsar Aidilof.
Ali Imran Nasution .
The criteria used included academic test scores, basic skills test scores, and achievement scores Nikomedes Oba Rendu.
Kristina Sara.
Anastasia Mude Sri Surati.
Sri Siswanti.
Andriani Kusumaningrum The criteria used include GPA, parental income, parental dependents, achievement and semester The criteria used include semester exams, attendance scores, memorization of AlQur'an, and economic The criteria used include the economic condition of the family, the average family income, and the number of parental dependents Ahmad Al A Dhomul Aflahin.
Ivan Ariful Fathoni.
Festian Cindrabumi .
Table 5.
Previous Research Results Judul Nama Hasil Decision Support Yusni Amaliah.
This research proves the System for Poor Sprianto .
effectiveness of the MOORA Judul Nama Hasil a method in selecting scholarship recipients, by ensuring the selection process is based on criteria such as area, house floor type, house wall type, house roof type.
WC, electricity, water, transportation, and parents' monthly income.
As a result of applying the method, 6 people were successfully selected as candidates with the highest scores ranging from 25 to 27 Scholarship Recipients Using the MOORA Method Combination of AHP and TOPSIS Methods for Recommendation of SMK Scholarship Recipients Based on Decision Support System Rasyid Ridho.
Hairani Hairani.
Kurniadin Abd Latif.
Rifqi Hammad .
No.
Judul Poor Achievement Scholarship Selection Decision Support System with Composite Performance Index (CPI) Method Nama Bahrin.
Betrisandi.
Maryam Diange .
Decision Support System for Bidikmisi Scholarship Recipients Using the SMART Method Sukamto.
Yanti Andriyani.
Ayu Lestari .
a method in selecting scholarship recipients, by ensuring the selection process is based on criteria such as area, house floor type, house wall type, house roof type.
WC, electricity, water, transportation, and parents' monthly income.
As a result of applying the method, 6 people were successfully selected as candidates with the highest scores ranging from 25 to 27 This research shows the combination of AHP and TOPSIS methods in determining scholarship recipients.
The AHP method plays a role in determining priority weights between criteria to avoid subjective weighting.
Meanwhile.
TOPSIS is applied to perform ranking based on the ideal solution positive and negative ideal The results show that the combination of t h e two methods provides convenience and speed in the decision-making process related to the selection of scholarship With this, the process of determining scholarship recipients can be carried out transparently and Hasil Based on the results of this study, it show that a decision support system has been designed in the form of an application using the CPI method.
The success of this system is measured through the ability to provide maximum results in the decision-making process This research reveals that the decision support system developed for Determining scholarship recipients using the SMART method can be implemented based on criteria such as GPA score, parents' income, father's job, mother's job, and number of Application of Nayve Bayes Classifier for Scholarship Recipient Decision Support Debby Alita.
Indah Sari.
Auliya Rahman Isnain.
Styawati .
Decision Support System for Determining Scholarship Recipients Using the ELECTRE Method Betaria Sonata Sianturi.
Volvo Sihombing.
Ibnu Rasyid Munthe .
No.
Judul Nama Decision Support System for Selection of Tahfidz Scholarship Candidates Using SAW Method Application of the Tsukamoto Fuzzy Method to the Decision Support System for Determining Scholarship Awards As a valuation, experiments were carried out using 10 data and the results obtained a sequence of scholarship recipient scores from highest to lowest This research argues that the application of scholarship recipient decision-making through application development is needed to overcome the conventional methods used in schools.
The results of the research show that the application of the Nayve Bayes Classifier in the decision support system for scholarship recipients can assist significantly for the school in determining scholarship recipients more accurately and The final results of this study indicate that the application of the ELECTRE method through application design in selecting scholarship recipients can be done quickly and effectively.
The criteria determined in determining Hasil scholarship recipients include average score, parents' income, number of parents' dependents, and number of student achievements Rifa Nurafiah In this study, the results of the Syabaniah.
Agung application of the SAW method in Wibowo.
Eva selecting prospective tahfidz Marsusanti.
Nani scholarship recipients based on 4 Purwati.
Rina criteria .
umber of memorization.
Riniawati .
tajweed, makhorijul huruf, and family statu.
proved effective in selecting scholarship recipients.
This is evidenced by the determination of 53 students Sari Susanti.
Galih The results of this study reveal that Repor Nawangsit the application of the Tsukamoto fuzzy method can help in determining student eligibility for Based on the results of the trial, students with a probability value of more than 00 are eligible for a scholarship Scholarship Acceptance Decision Support System Using Weighted Product Method Desfa Anisa.
Widya Septya Ningrum.
Retno Kusumo.
Widya Putri .
Application of Composite Performance Index (CPI) as a Method of Scholarship Recipient Selection Decision Support System Budy Satria.
Acihmah Sidauruk.
Raditya Wardhana.
Abdussalam Al Akbar.
Arinal Ihsan .
No.
Judul Nama Decision Support System for Bidikmisi Scholarship Recipients Muhammadiyah Gresik University with the WASPAS Method Amin Syifa.
Darmawan Aditama.
Indra Gita Anugrah Decision Support System for Academic Achievement Scholarship Rizal.
Hafizh Al Kautsar Aidilof.
Ali Imran Nasution .
Based on this research, the results obtained conclude that the application of a decision support system with the Weighted Product method through application design can accelerate and provide recommendations for prospective scholarship recipients.
In this case, the criteria covered include, parents' occupation, parents' income, the number of children, and the number of students This research uses 10 alternatives and 4 criteria covered such as parents' income.
GPA, electricity consumption, and semester in the process of determining worthy recipients of scholarship Through calculations carried out by the CPI method, 5 Hasil alternatives with the highest scores were found from the 10 alternatives tested.
The results of this study reveal that the CPI method is effectively used in selecting scholarship recipients in a measurable and targeted manner The result of this research is that the WASPAS method functions as a system that implements the ranking process.
This research also concludes that the application of the WASPAS method in the selection of scholarship recipients can be used in the selection of scholarship recipients help related parties in determining the right prospective students to receive bidikmisi The result of this research is the Preference Selection Index method into an application that includes criteria such as GPA.
Acceptance Using Preference Selection Index Application of Promethee Method in Scholarship Acceptance Decision Support System Nikomedes Oba Rendu.
Kristina Sara.
Anastasia Mude .
No.
Judul Nama semester, amount of parents' income, and number of parents' Then, based on system testing on 825 alternative data, this study concludes that the Preference Selection Index method is by the design and can provide appropriate recommendations so that it is effectively implemented in selecting scholarship recipients This research shows that the development of a decision support system application in scholarship acceptance using the Promethee method, determining scholarship recipients can be done effectively, accurately, and efficiently.
Through the Promethee calculation, the selection of scholarship recipients Hasil that was previously done manually can also minimize the error rate Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Method for Scholarship Recipient Determination Decision Support System Sri Surati.
Sri Siswanti.
Andriani Kusumaningrum Application of Decision Support System (SPK) by Using Fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Proces.
Method as Determination of PIP Scholarship Acceptance Ahmad Al A Dhomul Aflahin.
Ivan Ariful Fathoni.
Festian Cindrabumi .
Based on the results of the research, it is found that the application of a decision support system for determining scholarship recipients using the The SMART method provides benefits in making decisions to determine scholarship recipients The application of the SMART method based on the specified criteria also facilitates the school in determining scholarship recipients and avoids the subjective selection process.
Based on the results of the application of the Fuzzy AHP method with 3 criteria such as family economic conditions, average family income, and number of dependents of parents, this study succeeded in determining students who were eligible to receive PIP scholarships from all alternative PIP scholarship applicants obtained a clusterization value of 25% of alternatives entitled to receive and 75% not entitled to receive.
With this, it can be proven that the implementation of the Fuzzy AHP method in selecting prospective PIP scholarship recipients is very effective to be applied DISCUSSION Research Question 1 or RQ 1: What methods and criteria are used in the implementation of decision support systems in determining scholarship recipients? The use of methods and criteria in decision support systems for determining scholarship recipients is to increase objectivity, fairness, and transparency in the selection Based on the analysis conducted on 15 journals using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, various methods, and criteria used in decision support systems for determining scholarship recipients were found.
Research by Amaliah & Suprianto .
and Ridho et al.
, .
, use parents' income as a criterion in supporting the process of determining scholarship recipients by utilizing the application of decision support systems methods such as Multi-Objective Optimization based on Ratio (MOORA).
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).
Technique For Others Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), the use of these criteria and methods can provide convenience and speed in the decision-making process in the process of determining scholarship recipients transparently and objectively.
Research conducted by Alita et al.
, .
used the Naive Bayes method with the criteria of average report card scores, parents' income, and number of siblings.
Sianturi et al.
their research used the Electree method with the criteria of average grades, parental income, number of parental dependents, and number of student achievements.
While research by Syabaniah et al.
, .
uses the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method using the criteria for the amount of memorization, tajweed, makhorijul huruf, and poor family status.
The Fuzzy Tsukamoto method was used in Susanti & Nawangsit .
by taking the criteria of average final school grades, general knowledge championship achievements, and nonacademic decision championship achievements.
Other research conducted by Anisa et al.
implemented the Weighted Product method based on the criteria of parental employment, parental income, number of parental dependents, and average report card scores.
Research conducted by Adek et al.
, .
uses the Preference Selection method with the criteria of academic test scores, basic skills test scores, and achievement scores.
In research by (Rendu et al.
, 2.
Promethee uses the criteria of GPA, parental income, parental dependents, achievement, and semester.
Dahlan et al.
, .
and Satria et al.
, .
their research used the Composite Performance Index (CPI) method with criteria for ability in the field of study, responsibility, creativity, and communication as well as parental income.
GPA, electricity consumption, and Research conducted by Sukamto et al.
, .
and Surati et al.
, .
suggest that the use of the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) method by entering criteria based on value provides benefits in making decisions to determine scholarship recipients appropriately and can support the process of determining scholarship recipients by conducting experiments using 10 data and the results obtained a sequence of scholarship recipient values from highest to lowest.
In research by Aditama & Anugrah .
explained that using the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) method based on the criteria of parental dependents and distance of residence can help related parties in determining prospective students appropriately from the ranking process in the implementation of a decision support system.
Based on some of the research explanations above, the use of methods and criteria has proven to facilitate the implementation of a decision support system for determining scholarship recipients objectively and transparently.
This is because the right methods and criteria can minimize bias in the selection process so that the decisions taken are fairer and more accountable.
Thus, it can be ensured that the scholarship is given to the most qualified prospective recipient.
Research Question 2 or RQ 2: Does the journal explain the impact of implementing a decision support system on the process of determining scholarship recipients? In its utilization as a supporter in decision-making, especially in the process of determining scholarship recipients, decision support systems can have a significant impact in facilitating a fairer and more transparent selection process, so that every prospective recipient has the same opportunity.
Based on research bySyifa et al.
, .
proved that the use of decision support systems is effective in selecting scholarship recipients.
This is evidenced by the determination of 53 students to 10 students who deserve to be Tahfidz scholarship recipients.
In Susanti & NawangsitAos research .
explaining the use of decision support systems has a good impact, they revealed that using the Tsukamoto fuzzy method can help in determining student eligibility for scholarships.
Based on the results of the trial, students with a probability value of more than 80.
00 are eligible for a scholarship.
Research by Aflahin et al.
, .
successfully used a decision support system so that it had a significant impact on the determination of scholarship recipients, this is evidenced based on the results of the application of the Fuzzy AHP method with 3 criteria such as family economic conditions, average family income and number of dependents of parents, this study succeeded in determining students who were eligible to receive PIP scholarships from all alternative PIP scholarship applicants obtained a clusterization value of 25% alternatives entitled to receive and 75% not entitled to receive.
With this, it can be proven that the implementation of the Fuzzy AHP method of decision support systems in selecting prospective PIP scholarship recipients is very effective to implement.
The implementation of a decision support system can have a significant impact and broad benefits for various parties involved in the process of determining scholarship recipients.
For scholarship providers, the system helps ensure that scholarship funds are allocated effectively and efficiently.
For potential recipients, the system creates a fairer and more transparent selection process.
As for the selection team, the system eases their workload and allows them to focus on more strategic tasks.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the research that has been done, it can be concluded that based on the results of the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, the methods in decision support systems that are widely used by researchers are Composite Performance Index (CPI) and Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART).
The criteria for determining the most widely used scholarship recipients are parents' income and report card grades.
It can be concluded that the decision support system has a positive impact on the process of determining scholarship recipients in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and accuracy of REFERENCES