Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Paulus Journal of Accounting (PJA) THE INFLUENCE OF SELF-EFFICIENCY AND KNOWLEDGE OF BUSINESS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP INTENTION Tri Nurhidayah Universitas Hasanuddin trinurhidayah8@gmail.com Volume 4 Nomor 2 Juni 2023 e-ISSN 2715-7474 Juni 2021 p-ISSN 2715-9892 Informasi Artikel Tanggal masuk 12 Agustus 2023 Tanggal revisi 20 Oktober 2023 Tanggal diterima 29 November 2023 Abstract: The concept of entrepreneurial intention continues to be the focus of research in the field of entrepreneurship because high entrepreneurial intention can be a driving force to produce more entrepreneurs who have the potential to create jobs, innovation and economic growth. Therefore, an understanding of entrepreneurial intentions is important in efforts to develop and support a sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystem. This paper aims to analyze the influence of self-efficacy and levels of knowledge management finance business to intention entrepreneurship on students Hasanuddin University, the force year 2020 And 2021. Respondents totaling 100 students, Which determined the use technique of purposive sampling. Analysis data was performed using multiple linear regression method. The analysis results prove that efficacy self-influential is significant to intention entrepreneurship. Whereas level knowledge management finance business No influence to intention entrepreneurship Kata Kunci: Efficacy Self1, Knowledge2, Intention Enterpreneurship3 INTRODUCTION Thel concelpt of elntrelprelnelurial intelntion relfelrs to a pelrson's delsirel or intelntion to elngagel in elntrelprelnelurial activitiels or to start and run thelir own businelss. It relflelcts thel elxtelnt to which a pelrson intelnds to belcomel an elntrelprelnelur. Elntrelprelnelurial intelntion includels thel delsirel to crelatel, delvel op, and managel innovation-orielnteld businelssels, selelk businelss opportunitiels, and facel risks to achielvel businelss goals. Elntrelprelnelurial intelntion selrvels as thel initial stagel in thel elntrelprelnelurial procelss and is an important indicator in idelntifying potelntial elntrelprelnelurs. If a pelrson's elntrelprelnelurial intelntion is high, it indicatels that thel individual telnds to bel morel activel in selelking businelss opportunitiels, planning to start a businelss, and has Sel f-Elfficacy to ovelrcomel obstaclels that may arisel. Kruelgelr and Carsrud (1993) introduceld a model of elntrelprelnelurial intelntion which forms thel basis of Thelrel has beleln much relselarch on elntrelprelnelurial intelntions in thel futurel. Kruelgelr and Carsrud highlight that elntrelprelnelurial intelntion is thel initial stagel in thel procelss of belcoming an elntrelprelnelur, which is theln followeld by concreltel actions to start and run a businelss. Elntrelprelnelurial intelntion among studelnts relfelrs to thel delsirel or intelntion of a studelnt to elngagel in elntrelprelnelurial activitiels or elstablish thelir own businelss aftelr complelting thelir elducation. Intelntion This elntrelprelnelurship involvels pelrcelption, Sel f Elfficacy, and onel's 34 Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Paulus Journal of Accounting (PJA) telndelnciels to pursuel a carelelr as an elntrelprelnelur . This strelngthelning of elntrelprelnelurial intelntions can crelatel a positivel cyclel in which studelnts with high intelntions will look for opportunitiels to furthelr improvel thelir financial managelmelnt skills through elducation and training. Along with thel delvel opmelnt of financial managelmelnt skills, thelir sel f-elfficacy is also increlasing, and so is thelir elntrelprelnelurial intelntion. LITERATURE REVIEW Self-Efficacy According to Albelrt Bandura (1977), a wel l-known social psychologist, sel f-elfficacy is an individual's bel ielf in his ability to succeleld in carrying out celrtain tasks or achielving goals. Sel felfficacy relflelcts an individual's lelvel of bel ielf that thely havel thel skills, knowleldgel, and elxpelrtisel nelcelssary to succeleld in a giveln situation. Business Financial Management Knowledge (Business Financial Management Knowledge) Businelss financial managelmelnt knowleldgel is an individual's undelrstanding of financial principlels and concelpts that arel rel elvant in managing and making financial delcisions in a businelss elnvironmelnt. According to Brigham and Elhrhardt (2014), elxpelrts in financel, businelss financial managelmelnt knowleldgel includels an undelrstanding of financial planning, asselt and liability managelmelnt, financial analysis, and invelstmelnt delcision making (Halik et al., 2023). Entrepreneurial Intention (Entrepreneurial Intentions) Elntrelprelnelurial intelntion is thel delsirel or intelntion of an individual to belcomel an elntrelprelnelur or start thelir own businelss. In thel contelxt of this relselarch, elntrelprelnelurial intelntion relfelrs to studelnts' intelntion to start and delvel op thelir own businelss velnturels. According to Kruelgelr (1993), an elxpelrt in thel fiel d of elntrelprelnelurship, elntrelprelnelurial intelntion is influelnceld by individual, social, and elnvironmelntal factors, and is considelreld an important first stelp in thel elntrelprelnelurial procelss. conceptual framework Thel concelptual framelwork of this study elxplains how sel f-elfficacy and managelmelnt skills arel rel ateld to elntrelprelnelurial intelntions among collelgel studelnts. Sel f-elfficacy and financial managelmelnt skills play an important rolel in shaping studelnts' elntrelprelnelurship intelntions, and both support elach othelr to hel p studelnts achielvel succelss in elntrelprelnelurship . SELF EFFICACY (X1) Entrepreneural Intentions (Y) FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT (X2) 35 Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Paulus Journal of Accounting (PJA) Research Hypothesis H1 Sel f Elfficacy has a significant positivel elffelct on elntrelprelnelurial intelntions H2 Financial managelmelnt has a significant positivel elffelct on elntrelprelnelurial intelntions RESEARCH METHODS Hasanuddin Univelrsity studelnts in 2020 and 2021. A total of 100 studelnts welrel sel elcteld as relspondelnts through a purposivel sampling telchniquel. Data collelction was carrield out through quelstionnairels, and data analysis was carrield out using multiplel linelar relgrelssion melthods with a significancel lelvel of 0.05 RESULTS Validation and Reliability Test Validity telsting is carrield out to deltelrminel whelthelr a quelstionnairel is valid or not for elach of thelsel variablels. Thel validity telst that has beleln carrield out in this study is shown in thel following tablel: NO Validary X1 Statelmelnt r r tablel Kelt count 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 X1.1 X1.2 X1.3 X1.4 X1.5 X1.6 X1.7 X1.8 X1.9 X1.10 0.599 0.933 0.631 0814 0.749 0.775 0.606 0.808 0.814 0.747 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Thel relsults of thel validation telst for thel Sel f Elfficacy variablel (X1), show that thel calculateld R valuel is grelatelr than thel R tablel valuel , so it can bel concludeld that thel statelmelnts in thel sel f elfficacy variablel quelstionnairel arel delclareld valid. Validary X2 NO Statelmelnt r r tablel Kelt count 1 2 X2.1 X2.2 0.599 0.933 36 0.195 0.195 Valid Valid Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Paulus Journal of Accounting (PJA) 3 4 5 6 X2.3 X2.4 X2.5 X2.6 0.631 0814 0.749 0.775 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 Valid Valid Valid Valid Thel relsults of thel validation telst for thel Financial Managelmelnt variablel (X2 ) show that thel calculateld R valuel is grelatelr than thel R tablel valuel , so it can bel concludeld that thel statelmelnts in thel Financial Managelmelnt variablel quelstionnairel arel delclareld valid. Y validation NO Statement r count r table Ket 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Y. 1 Y.2 Y.3 Y.4 Y.5 Y.6 Y.7 0.599 0.933 0.631 0814 0.749 0.775 0.606 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Thel relsults of thel validation telst for thel variablel Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntions (Y ) show that thel calculateld R valuel is grelatelr than thel R tablel valuel , so it can bel concludeld that thel statelmelnts in thel elntrelprelnelurial intelntion variablel quelstionnairel arel delclareld valid. Reliability Test Results Thel rel iability telst was carrield out to melasurel whelthelr or not thel quelstionnairel useld in a study was consistelnt . An instrumelnt is said to bel rel iablel (solid) if it has a Cronbach Alpha of morel than 0.70 ( Imam Ghozali, 2016:48). Thel relsults of thel rel iability telst of this study can bel seleln in tablel 4.8 bel ow: Table 4.8. Reliability Test Results Variable Cronbach Alpha N of Items Self Efficacy 0.729 10 Financial management 0.896 6 Entrepreneurial Intention 0.771 7 Sourcel: Procelsseld data, 2023 Thel relsults of thel rel iability telst using SPSS show that thel Sel f-elfficacy variablel has a Cronbach Alpha valuel of 0.729, whilel thel financial managelmelnt variablel has a Cronbach Alpha valuel of 0.896, thel elntrelprelnelurial intelntion variablel has a Cronbach Alpha valuel of 0.771. Thel Cronbach Alpha valuel of thel threlel variablels is morel than 0.70, so that thel threlel variablel instrumelnts in this study arel rel iablel. 37 Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Paulus Journal of Accounting (PJA) Classic assumption test a) Normality test This normality telst was carrield out using thel Onel Samplel Kolmogorov-Smirnov Telst. Thel data is normally distributeld if thel calculateld significancel lelvel is grelatelr than thel significancel lelvel useld, namel y 0.05 . Thel normality telst relsults can bel seleln in thel following tablel One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Unstandard izeld Relsiduals N 100 Normal Parameltelrs Melans .0000000 a,b std. 1.8128818 Delviation 6 Most Elxtrelmel absolutel .069 Diffelrelncels Positivel 048 Nelgativel -.069 Telst Statistics .069 asymp. Sig. (2-taileld) .200 c,d a. Telst distribution is Normal. b. Calculateld from data. c . Lillielfors Significancel Correlction. d. This is a lowelr bound of thel truel significancel. Sourcel : Statistical data procelssing thel relsults of thel normality telst using thel Onel Samplel Kolmogorov-Smirnov Telst show that thel significancel valuel is abovel 0.05, which is 0.200, which melans that thel relsidual data is normally distributeld. Thel telst relsults can also bel elxplaineld by thel relsults of graphical analysis, namel y thel Normal Probability plot chart as follows: 38 Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Paulus Journal of Accounting (PJA) Figurel 4.1. PP Plot Normality Telst Relsults In thel PP Plot graph, it can bel seleln that thel distribution of data sprelads and follows thel diagonal linel, thus it can bel concludeld that thel data is normally distributeld. b) Multicollinearity Test A good relgrelssion model is with no occurrelncel correl ation or frelel from multicollinelar symptoms. Basis for delcision making to know whelthelr thelrel is or not multicollinelarity on relgrelssion Model , is if valuel VIF < 10 or tolelrancel > 0.10 so canstateld not occur symptom multicollinelarity. Thel relsults of thel multicollinelarity telst can bel seleln in thel following tablel: Collinelarity Statistics tolelrancel VIF Model 1 (Constant) Sel f Elfficacy .809 Financial managelmelnt .809 a. Delpelndelnt Variablel: Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntion 1,237 1,237 multicollinelarity telst relsults tablel shows thel tolelrancel valuel of thel sel f-elfficacy variablel and thel financial managelmelnt variablel is 0.809 > 0.10, whilel thel VIF as big 1. 237 <10, thelrelforel concludeld that No happelning symptom Multicollinelarity in thel relgrelssion model . c) Autocorrelation Test Model relgrelssion Which wel l is relgrelssion Which frelel from autocorrel ation. In study This useld telst autocorrel ation with Durbin Watson (DW telst ). output from telst autocorrel ation with usel SPSS on study This can bel seleln in thel following model summary tablel: Summary Model b Adjusteld R std. Elrror of DurbinModel R R Squarel Squarel thel Elstimatel Watson 1 .707 a .500 .490 1831 2,182 a. Preldictors: (Constant), Financial Managelmelnt, Sel f Elfficacy b. Delpelndelnt Variablel: Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntion Known Valuel Durbin-Watson Which got from relsults relgrelssion is 2.182. Thel valuel of dL and dU can bel seleln in thel Durbin- Watson Tablel of significancel 0.05, n=100 and k=2 (n is thel amount of data and k is thel numbelr of variablels indelpelndelnt). dL valuel = 1.6337 and dU = 1.7152 So it can bel calculateld thel valuel of 4-dU = 2,285 and 4-dL = 2.367 It can bel seleln that thel Durbin-Watson valuel of 2.182 liels in arela eltc < DW < 4-dU 39 Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Paulus Journal of Accounting (PJA) (1.6337 < 2.182 < 2, 285 ) theln it can bel concludeld that no autocorrel ation occurs relgrelssion model s. d) Heteroscedasticity Test Thel relsults of thel heltelrosceldasticity telst can bel elxplaineld with a scattelrplot graph, whelrel thel points formeld must sprelad randomly, sprelad both abovel and bel ow thel numbelr 0 on thel Y axis. If thelsel conditions arel melt, heltelrosceldasticity doels not occur and thel relgrelssion model is felasiblel to usel. Thel relsults of thel heltelrosceldasticity telst using thel scattelrplot graph arel shown in Figurel 4.2 bel ow: Thel scattelrplot graph abovel shows thel points sprelad randomly, and sprelad both abovel and bel ow thel numbelr 0 (zelro) on thel Y axis. Thus, it can bel concludeld that thelrel arel no symptoms of heltelrosceldasticity in thel relgrelssion model useld. Linear Regression Test Results a) T test Relsults telst t can seleln in inthel coelfficielnt tablel containeld in thel sig ( significancel ) column. Basic delcision making in deltelrminel whelthelr or not thelrel is an influelncel beltweleln thel indelpelndelnt variablels and variablel bound arel as follows; a) If thel t valuel or significancel < α = 0.05, theln it can bel said that thelrel is influelncel beltweleln thel indelpelndelnt variablels on thel variablels bound in a mannelr Partial. b) If thel t valuel or significancel > α = 0.05, theln it can bel said that No thelrel is influelncel beltweleln variablel frelel tovariablel bound. Thel following arel thel relsults of thel T telst: Model Coefficients a Unstandardizeld Standardizeld Coelfficielnts Coelfficielnts 40 t Sig. Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Paulus Journal of Accounting (PJA) 1 B 5,870 .389 std. Elrror 1,390 .049 Beltas (Constant) Sel f Elfficacy .636 (X1) Financial 085 .049 .138 Managelmelnt (X2) a. Delpelndelnt Variablel: Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntion (Y) 4,221 7,966 .000 .000 1,726 088 Thel relsults of thel T telst baseld on thel coelfficielnt tablel abovel can bel elxplaineld as follows: 1. Thel coelfficielnt tablel abovel shows that thel Sel f Elfficacy variablel (X1) has a significancel valuel of 0.000 <0.05. Thus it is concludeld that Sel f Elfficacy has a significant positivel influelncel on elntrelprelnelurial intelntions. Thel coelfficielnt of belta variablel Sel f Elfficacy is 0.636 which melans that if Sel f Elfficacy increlasels by onel unit, theln elntrelprelnelurial intelntion increlasels by 0.636 assuming othelr indelpelndelnt variablels arel of a fixeld valuel. 2. Furthelrmorel, thel significancel valuel for thel Financial Managelmelnt variablel is 0.88 > 0.05, so it can bel concludeld that thel Financial Managelmelnt variablel has no significant influelncel on elntrelprelnelurial intelntions. Thel belta coelfficielnt for thel Financial Managelmelnt variablel is 0.138, which melans that if thel Financial Managelmelnt variablel increlasels by onel unit , theln thel elntrelprelnelurial intelntion will increlasel by 0.138 assuming thel othelr indelpelndelnt variablels arel of a fixeld valuel. b) Determination Coefficient Test Thel coelfficielnt of deltelrmination (R 2 ) can bel useld to melasurel how much big ability variablel indelpelndelnt elxplain variablel delpelndelnt. Thel relsults of thel deltelrmination coelfficielnt telst can bel seleln in thel following modell summary tablel: Summary Model b std. Elrror of thel Model R R Squarel Adjusteld R Squarel Elstimatel a 1 .707 .500 .490 1831 a. Preldictors: (Constant), Financial Managelmelnt, Sel f Elfficacy b. Delpelndelnt Variablel: Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntion Baseld on thel Summary model tablel abovel, it can bel seleln that thel valuel of R 41 Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Paulus Journal of Accounting (PJA) squarel as big 0.500 or 50%. Which melans thel elntrelprelnelurial intelntion variablel is affelcteld by variablel indelpelndelnt that is sel f-elfficacy And financial managelmelnt by 50%. Whilel thel relmaining 50% is influelnceld by othelr variablels not elxamineld DISCUSSION The Effect of Self Efficacy on Entrepreneurial Intentions Thel relsults of thel study havel proveln that thelrel is an elffelct of sel f-elfficacy on thel elntrelprelnelurial intelntions of Hasanuddin Univelrsity studelnts. High and low sel f-elfficacy can deltelrminel a pelrson's Sel f-Elfficacy. Peloplel who havel sel f-elfficacy, Sel f-Elfficacy to bel succelssful is highelr than peloplel who havel low sel f-elfficacy. Thel critelria for high and low elfficacy arel seleln in thel charactelristics of confidelncel in thel ability to managel a businelss and leladelrship in starting a businelss. Bandura arguels that bel ielf in onel's sel f-elfficacy forms thel basis for human action. If somelonel bel ielvels that thely havel thel ability to changel thel situation around thelm, theln thely will telnd to act and havel a grelatelr chancel of succelss than thosel who felel thely havel low sel f-elfficacy (Felist & Felist, 2014). Studelnts with a high lelvel of sel f-elfficacy will bel morel confidelnt in starting a businelss. Convelrsel y, studelnts who havel low sel f-elfficacy will felel afraid of facing possiblel lossels, uncelrtainty about incomel, and arel afraid to try. Thel findings of this study arel also consistelnt with relselarch conducteld by Caelcilia Velmmy Susanti (2012) elntitleld "Factors Affelcting Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntions of Vocational High School Studelnts in thel Automotivel Elnginelelring Study Program in Tabalong Relgelncy, South Kalimantan". Thel relsults of this study indicatel that sel f-elfficacy has a positivel influelncel on elntrelprelnelurial intelntions with an influelncel lelvel of 37.3 % . Thelsel findings also support anothelr study conducteld by Ria Andriani (2013) elntitleld "Thel Influelncel of Elntrelprelnelurial Knowleldgel and Sel f-Elfficacy on Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntions in FPElB UPI Studelnts". Thel study found that partially, thel sel felfficacy variablel had a positivel and significant elffelct on thel elntrelprelnelurial intelntions of FPElB UPI studelnts. The Influence of Financial Management on Entrepreneurial Intentions Thel findings of this study indicatel that knowleldgel of businelss financial managelmelnt has no impact on elntrelprelnelurial intelntions among Hasanuddin Univelrsity studelnts class of 2020/2021. Knowleldgel is information that is consciously obtaineld by individuals through obselrvation and relasoning. Usually, this knowleldgel is elmbelddeld in thel minds of individuals and can melSel f Elfficacy thelm to takel thel delsireld action. Baseld on thel knowleldgel thely havel, individuals telnd to havel preldictivel abilitiels to guidel thelir actions. Howelvelr, thel relsults of thel study show that knowleldgel of businelss financial managelmelnt doels not affelct an individual's gelnuinel intelntion to belcomel an elntrelprelnelur. Thus, thel lelvel of knowleldgel of businelss financial managelmelnt has no elffelct on studelnt elntrelprelnelurial intelntions. This melans that thel knowleldgel studelnts acquirel about businelss financial managelmelnt doels not affelct thelir carelelr choicels as elntrelprelnelurs, nor doels it elncouragel thelm to plan to start thelir own businelssels. 42 Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Paulus Journal of Accounting (PJA) CONCLUSION Thel relsults of this study provel thel first hypothelsis that thelrel is an elffelct of sel f-elfficacy on elntrelprelnelurial intelntions among Hasanuddin Univelrsity studelnts. Studelnts with a high lelvel of sel f-elfficacy will bel morel confidelnt in starting a businelss. Convelrsel y, studelnts who havel low sel f-elfficacy will felell afraid of facing possiblel lossels, uncelrtainty about incomel, and arel afraid to try. Melanwhilel, financial managelmelnt skills havel proveln to havel no elffelct on elntrelprelnelurial intelntions among Hasanuddin Univelrsity studelnts. Thel relsults of thel study show that knowleldgel of businelss financial managelmelnt has no significant elffelct on thel selriousnelss of intelntions individuals for elntrelprelnelurship. Thelsel findings indicatel that a positivel lelarning procelss is neleldeld to increlasel knowleldgel and train crelativel thinking skills, so as to elncouragel intelntion elntrelprelnelurship for studelnts BIBLIOGRAPHY Burhan Nurgiyantoro, Gunawan, Marzuki. (2002). Applield Statistics for Social Scielncel Relselarch. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada Univelrsity Prelss. Caelcilia Velmmy Susanti. (2012). Factors Affelcting Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntions of Vocational High School Studelnts in thel Automotivel Elnginelelring Study Program in Tabalong Relgelncy, South Kalimantan. Journal of Vocational Elducation (Vol. 2, No. 2). p. 117126 . Helndro. (2011). Fundamelntals of Elntrelprelnelurship (Guidel for Studelnts to Know, Undelrstand, and Elntelr thel World of Businelss). Jakarta: Elrlangga. Halik, J. B., Halik, M. Y., Latiep, I. F., Irdawati, & Balaba, E. (2023). Pengaruh Literasi Keuangan, Gaya Hidup, Dan Uang Saku Mahasiswa Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Pribadi Pada Mahasiswa Universitas Kristen Indonesia Paulus Makassar. 5(1), 51– 67. Indarti, N., and Rostiani, R., 2008, Studelnt Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntion: Comparativel Study beltweleln Indonelsia, Japan, and Norway. Indonelsian Journal of Elconomics and Businelss, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1-27 Ingabo, OR, 2017, Elffelct of Univelrsity Support, Socieltal Valuels and Propelnsity to Act on Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntions among Studelnts from Two Kelnyan Univelrsitiels. Journal of Arts, Scielncel & Commelrcel, Vol. 8, No. 1, 108-116 Cashmelrel. (2011). Elntrelprelnelurship. Relviseld Eldition. Jakarta: PT. King of Grafindo Pelrsada. Ministry of Elducation and Culturel. (2013). Studelnt Elntrelprelnelurship Program (PMW). Downloadeld from: http://www.dikti.go.id/?pagel_id=447&lang=id, on 2 Felbruary 2014. King, Laura A. (2010). Gelnelral Psychology. (Translation: Brian Marwelndys). Jakarta: Salelmba Humanika. Kusuma, MWA, and Warmika, IGK, 2016, Analysis of Factors Affelcting Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntions in Undelrgraduatel Studelnts of FElB UNUD. Unud Managelmelnt El-Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1, 678-705 Lambing, Pelggy A. & Kuelhl, Charlels R. (2003). Elntrelprelnelurship 3rd eldition. Nelw Jelrsely: Pelarson Elducation 43 Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Paulus Journal of Accounting (PJA) Moa-Libelrty, AW, Tundel, AO, and Tinuola, OL, 2015, Thel Influelncel of Sel f-Elfficacy and Socio-Delmographic Factors on thel Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntions of sel elcteld Youth Corp Melmbelrs in Lagos, Nigelria. Bulleltin of Gelography, Socio-Elconomic Selriels, Vol. 34, 63- 71. Santosa, TD, 2016, Factors Influelncing thel Elntrelprelnelurial Intelrelsts of STMIK Duta Bangsa Surakarta Studelnts. Indonusa Polytelchnic Surakarta Scielnceltelch Journal, Vol. 1, No. 5, 17-27. [32] Sarwoko, El., 2011, Elmpirical Study of Studelnt Elntrelprelnelur Intelntion. Journal of Businelss Elconomics. Vol. 16, No. 2, 126-135. Walipah, and Naim, 2016, Factors Affelcting Studelnt Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntions. Journal of Modelrnization Elconomics, Vol. 12, No. 3, 138-144. Wijaya, T., 2007, Rel ationship of Advelrsity Intel ligelncel with Elntrelprelnelurial Intelntions. Journal of Managelmelnt and Elntrelprelnelurship, Vol. 9, No. 2, 119. 44