International Journal of Education.
Information Technology and Others (IJEIT).
April 2023, 6 .
, 281-285 DOI: https://doi.
org/10.
5281/zenodo.
p-ISSN: 2654-2528 e-ISSN: 2623-2324 Accredited by Directorate General of Strengthening for Research and Development Available online at https://jurnal.
net/index.
php/IJEIT The Effect of Leadership Style and Work Motivation on Employee Performance In Sout Jakarta Publik Accountants Siska Yunanti Human Resource Management Study Program.
Pamulang University.
Pamulang .
Indonesia Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
1 April 2023 9 Aprril 2023 21 April 2023 Keywords:
Abstract This study aims to determine the effect of Leadership Style and Work Motivation on Employee Performance in South Jakarta Public Accountants, to determine the effect of Leadership Style on Employee Performance in South Jakarta Public Accountants, to determine the effect of Work Motivation on Employee Performance in South Jakarta Public Accountants to determine the effect Leadership Style and Work Motivation together on Employee Performance at South Jakarta Public Accountants.
The method used in this research is quantitative.
The population in this study were all employees with a total of 79 employees.
The sample used was 79 respondents with data collection techniques and Methods of data analysis using validity test, reliability test, classic assumption test, regression analysis, correlation coefficient analysis, coefficient of determination analysis and hypothesis testing.
Based on the results of the study, it shows that Leadership Style has an effect on Employee Performance, indicated by the value of tcount = 970 while ttable = 1.
count>ttabl.
Work Motivation has an effect on Employee Performance with the value of tcount = 14.
150 while ttable = 1.
count>ttabl.
with a significant level of 0.
00 <0.
Leadership Style and Work Motivation on Employee Performance in South Jakarta Public Accountants where the value of fcount = 120.
ftable = 3.
count>ftabl.
with a significance of 0.
000 <0.
The multiple regression equation is as follows: Y = 3.
335 X1 0.
X2 The multiple correlation is 0.
872, the test results for the coefficient of determination are 76% and the remaining 24% is influenced by other Leadership Style.
Motivation.
Performance (*) Corresponding Author: dosen02590@unpam.
How to Cite: Yunanti.
The Effect of Leadership Style and Work Motivation on Employee Performance In Sout Jakarta Publik Accountants.
International Journal of Education.
Information Technology, and Others, 6.
, 281-285.
https://doi.
org/10.
5281/zenodo.
INTRODUCTION
Everty leader basicalli has a different behavior in leading his followers, the behavior of these leaders is called a leadership style.
Leadership style is a way for leaders to inluence theri subordinates which is expressed in the from of patterns of behavior or personality.
According to Rivai and Mulyadi in Kumala and Agustina .
defines that :leadership style is a set of characteristic used by leaders to influence subordinates so that organizational goals can be achives or it can alsi be said that leadership style is a pattern of behovior and strategies that are preferred and often applied by a leaderAy.
Yunanti.
/ International Journal of Education.
Information Technology and Others (IJEIT) 6 .
, 281285 A personAos leadership style is identical to the personAos leadership type.
The leadership style of a leader has its own unique and distinctive traits, habits, temperament, character, and personality, to the behavior and style that distinguishes him from others (Erlangga, 2.
Based on the explanation regarding the definition of leadership style, it can be concluded that the leadership style of each leader hat its own character, behavior, and personality traits that distinguish it from others.
Effective leaders can influence subordinates in order to achieve organizational Motivation is important because motivation supports human behavior so that they want to work hard and enthusiatically in achieving optimal things.
Motivation as encoutagement, is an important factor in carrying out work If each job can be run optimally, employee performance can be realized in accordance with prganizational goals.
Witahout motivation, an employee feels reluctant to carry out a job well.
Employee performance will be achieved if there is a will from oneself and encouragement from other parties.
According to Hasibuan in (Sutrisno, 2.
Aufound that motivation is a stimulant of desire and driving force of oneAos will to work because each motive has a specific goal to be achivedAy.
Based on the understanding of work motivation according to the experts above, it can be concuded by the authors that the notion of work motivation is a situation in a personAos personality that encourages an individualAos desire to carry out certain activities to achieve a goal in a person will manifest a behavior that is directed at the goal of acvieve satisfaction goal.
Performance is the result of employee work seen from the aspect of quality, quantity, working time, and cooperation to achieve the goals set by teh oragnization (Sutrisno, 2.
and according to Mangkunegara .
Auperformances is the result of work in quality and quantity achieved by an employee in carrying out his duties in accordance with the responsibilities given to himAy.
For the definition of performance above, it can be concluded that performance is the result or work in quality and quantity achieve by an employee in carrying out his duties in accordance with the responsibilities given to him.
RESEARCH METHOD
In the research, the author uses an associative quantitative research method and according to Sugiyono .
explain that Auquantitative research is a process of finding knowledge that uses data in the form or numbers as a tool to analyze information about what you want to knowAy.
This study uses an associative approach, according to Sugiyono .
Auassociative is research that aims to determine the effect or raltionship between two or more variablesAy.
This associative research can be built a theory that functions to explain, predict and control a phenomenon.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
To find teh results of this study, the set data were proscessed using the SPSS 24 statistical application and testing was carried out.
The results of the research on the influence of leadership style and work motivation on employee performance show that there is an influence between leadership style on employee performance, - 282 - Yunanti.
/ International Journal of Education.
Information Technology and Others (IJEIT) 6 .
, 281285 there is an influence of work motivation on employee performance, and there is an influence between leadership style and work motivation on employee performance.
To find out the results of this study, the data set was processed using the SPSS 24 statistical application and testing was carried out.
Based on the results of data processing are as follows :
The Influence of Leadership Style (X.
on Employee Performance (Y) Leadership style has a significant effect on employee performance with a regression equation Y = 6.
800 X1 .
The correlation coefficient value of 0.
807 means that the two variables have a very strong relationship level.
The coefficient of determination is 0.
650, meaning that the two variables have a strong degree of relationship.
The coefficient of determination is 65%.
The hypothesis test obtained results tcount > ttable .
970 > 1.
and has a sig value <0.
000 <0.
, meaning that Ha1 is accepted in other words that Leadership Style has a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance, according to the positive results , then the greater the Leadership Style in the company, the Employee Performance will increase.
Problem related to leadership style on employee performance at the Muhammad Danial Public accounting Firm.
South Jakarta conducted a series of surveys related to leadership style.
According to Kartono .
Auleadership style is the nature, habits, temperament, character and personality that distingushes a leader in interacting with othersAy.
That way employee performance will increase and effectiveness.
Effect of work motivasion .
on employee performance (Y) At the Muhammad Danial South Jakarta Public Accounting Firm will Work motivation has a significant effect on employee performance with the regression equation Y = 5.
829 X2.
The corelation coefficient value is 0.
850, meaning that the two varibles have a very strong relationship level.
The coefficint of determination is 0.
772, meaning that the two variables have a strong degree of relationship.
The coefficient of determination is 77.
hypothesis testing result obtained Tcount > Ttable .
150 >1.
and has a sig value <0.
000<0.
, meaning that Ha1 is accepted in other words that work motivation has a positive and significant effect on employee perfromance, according to the positive result, then the greater the work motivation in the company, the employee performence will increase.
In aiming to improve employee performance through appropriate work motivation at the Muhammad Danidal South Jakarta Public Accounting Firm, hereby perform or provide the needs neede by employees such as physiological needs, needs for a sense of security, and social needs.
According to Hasibuah .
Aufinding that motivation is a stimuland of desire and driving force of oneAos will to work because each motive has a specific goal to be achieve:.
That way the performance of The effect of leadership style (X.
and work Motivation (X.
on employee performance (Y) - 283 - Yunanti.
/ International Journal of Education.
Information Technology and Others (IJEIT) 6 .
, 281285 Based on the resluts of the study, it shows that leadership style and work motoivation have a simultaneous effect on employee performance by obtaining the regression esuation Y = 3.
335 X1 0.
559 X2, the value of the correlation coefficient or the degree of raltionship between the independent variables and the variables relates results obtained by 0.
872 means that it has a very strong relationship, the coefficient of determination is 0.
760 or the contributin of its influence simultaneously is 76% while the remaining 24% is influenced by other The hypothesis test obtained by Fcount>Ftable .
609 >3.
and has a sig value <0.
000<0.
, meaning that Ha3 is accepted and Ho3 is rejected.
Accroding to Gatot Kusjono.
Firmansyah .
under the totle the influence of leadership style and work motivation on employee performance at PT Lee Cooper Indonesia.
Sout Jakarta.
Obtaining reserach results the research resluts obtained multiple linear regression aquation Y = 11.
430 X1 0.
299 X2 witg Fcount>Ftable .
565>2.
meaning that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, meaning that there is a signisicant influence between leadership style and work motivation on employee performance with the contribution of leadership and motivation variable to performance indicated a coefficient of determination of partially, leadership style and motivation also influence the performance of employee of Public Accountants in south Jakarta.
CONCLUSION
For the results of the analysis and discussion of leadership style and work motivation on employee performance, it can be concluded that :
Leadership style has a psotice and significant effect on employee performance, according to the posotive results, the greater the leadership style that exists in company leaders, the employee performance will increase and have good results.
Work motivation has a positive and significant effect on employee performance, according to the positive in the company, the greater the work motivation applied in the company, the employee performance will increase and have enthusiasm at work and affect employee performance.
Based on the results of the study, it shows that leadership style (X.
and work motivation .
have a significant effect on employee performance by obtaining the regression equation Y=3.
335 X1 0.
559 X2, the value of the correlation coefficient or the leverl of relationship between the independent variable and related variables obtained by 0.
872, the point has a very strong relatonship, the value of the coefficient of deterniation is 760 or the simultaneous contribution of 76% while the remaining 24% is influenced by other factors.
The hypotheris thest was obtained based on the results of hypothesis testing in the table above, the value of Fhitung>Ftable .
609>3.
was obtained, this was reinforced by a significance probability value of 0.
000<0.
05 meaning that Ha3 was accepted and Ho3 rejected.
- 284 -
Yunanti.
/ International Journal of Education.
Information Technology and Others (IJEIT) 6 .
, 281285
BIBLIOGRAPHY