SINERGI Vol.
No.
June 2021: 153-158 http://publikasi.
id/index.
php/sinergi http://doi.
org/10.
22441/sinergi.
BANDWIDTH AND GAIN ENHANCEMENT OF MICROSTRIP
ANTENNA USING DEFECTED GROUND STRUCTURE AND
HORIZONTAL PATCH GAP
Dian Rusdiyanto1*.
Catur Apriono2.
Dian Widi Astuti1.
Muslim1 Department of Electrical Engineering.
Faculty of Engineering.
Universitas Mercu Buana.
Indonesia Department of Electrical Engineering.
Faculty of Engineering.
Universitas Indonesia.
Indonesia Abstract This research proposed microstrip antenna design using the Defected Ground Structure (DGS) and horizontal patch gap (HPG) for bandwidth and enhancement purposes.
This design is to reduce the weakness of a microstrip antenna, which has small gain and narrow bandwidth.
The design was simulated in CST Microwave Studio with a working frequency of 2.
4 GHz.
The design consists of three stages model, i.
, conventional design.
DGS modification, and the combination DGS using a Horizontal Patch Gap (DGSHPG).
The radius of the conventional circular patch is 16.
The substrate has 4.
6 of dielectric constant, 1.
6 of substrate height, and 0.
025 of the loss tangent.
The simulation results show that the DGS design produces more bandwidth and gain than a conventional design, where the bandwidth and gain improvement 2 MHz and 1.
73 dB, respectively.
The DGS model is combined with a gap that separates the circular patch (DGSHPG) to achieve the optimum design.
The results show the bandwidth and gain improvement of more than 50% and 18.
1% compared to the DGS design, respectively.
Other parameter performance also shows improvement, such as a reflection factor with -53.
3 dB at the center frequency.
The physical change also influences the patchAos radius, where it is reduced around 1.
4 mm or 8.
4% from the original Overall, the proposed design has succeeded in achieving bandwidth and gain enhancement and reducing the patch Keywords:
Bandwidth.
DGS.
Gain.
Gap.
Microstrip antenna.
Article History:
Received: June 16, 2020 Revised: September 4, 2020 Accepted: September 14, 2020 Published: February 10, 2021 Corresponding Author:
Dian Rusdiyanto Department of Electrical Engineering.
Faculty of Engineering.
Universitas Mercu Buana.
Indonesia Email:
@mercubuana.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license INTRODUCTION Information technology is increasingly developing, which is in line with the emergence of convenience for the community.
Furthermore, many applications are now available in one As an example, in the past, the mobile phone only provides call and message service.
Some applications appear, such as internet access from both mobile data and wireless fidelity (Wi-F.
, a Global Positioning System (GPS) and so on.
These applications work on certain frequencies.
Therefore, equipment should provide antennas that can match those One of the antennas that can be established is a microstrip antenna that has been studied to resonate for many applications and cover more than one frequency, such as .
, 2, 3.
The antenna microstrip is a modern antenna massively used and developed for wireless communication, especially spacecraft applications and low profile antenna applications.
This antenna consists of a substrate and thin metallic as a radiating element or as a ground.
patch of microstrip antenna can be created in some forms like rectangular, triangle, and This antenna has some advantages such as inexpensive, lightweight and easy to However, its bandwidth is narrow Rusdiyanto et al.
Bandwidth and Gain Enhancement of Microstrip Antenna using A SINERGI Vol.
No.
June 2021: 153-158 and produces small gain as well as inefficient radiation .
Hence, this study aims to reduce these weaknesses and will focus on the gain and bandwidth enhancement.
Some papers have researched microstrip antennas in enhancing gain and bandwidth.
Research .
studied the integrated antenna and low noise amplifier for increasing gain.
This research used two transistors of NE3509M04 proven effectively, creating high gain in a simple Another research is utilizing a reflecting layer with dimension 55 mm x 60 mm .
Its simulation result shows gain improvement.
However, it needs some additional structure that can reduce the space of the equipment.
general study of gain improvement methods can be seen in .
that elaborates the patch structure and microstrip antenna material.
For bandwidth increment, .
used a Defected Ground Structure method (DGS) that operates at 2.
4 GHz of frequency and has 180 MHz of bandwidth.
Nevertheless, it still can be improved for wider bandwidth .
Gap-coupled of the parasitic patch can also increase bandwidth value, as shown at .
, producing dual resonant frequency.
Some studies also proved that gap-couple could widen bandwidth antenna .
The state of the art of this research is to combine a Defected Ground Structure and Horizontal Patch Gap (DGSHGP) method.
The antennaAos basic geometry is a circular patch using inset feed for matching frequency to resonate at 2.
4 GHz.
Further, the antenna design modifies the DGS that expands the bandwidth Subsequently, a circular patch with DGS structure puts a gap in the middle of the patch that separates both in a certain dimension.
This method is expected to affect the gain and bandwidth of the antenna.
Because the gap created a mutually coupled patch that influenced the equivalent circuitAos capacitance, this method influenced bandwidth and gain results.
Antenna design will be simulated using CST Microwave Studio.
ANTENNA DESIGN AND SIMULATION
Conventional Design The design of the proposed microstrip antenna has three stages.
The first is to build a conventional design using a circular patch by calculating various parameters to determine the patchAos radius.
This conventional design applies fully metal of the ground in the back of the patch.
This antenna also adopts an inset feed for matching at the resonant frequency, as shown in Figure 1 .
Figure 1.
The conventional circular patch design This antenna design considers the substrate of FR4 with a dielectric constant (A.
of The substrate has 1.
6 mm of the height .
025 of the loss tangents .
an ).
Those parameters can determine the patchAos actual radius .
using cavity model formulation to resonate at 2.
4 GHz .
The unit a in .
must be in cm, while resonant frequency .
is in Hz.
From .
, the obtained radius is 16.
7 mm.
The resonant frequency .
110 for the dominant TM110 can be expressed in .
, where v0 is the speed of light in free space.
A correction is introduced for circular patch design using an effective radius .
A) to replace the actual radius, as shown in .
Rusdiyanto et al.
Bandwidth and Gain Enhancement of Microstrip Antenna using A p-ISSN: 1410-2331 e-ISSN: 2460-1217 Table 1.
Conventional Circular Design Parameter Parameters Value .
Wfeed By calculating the equations, the value of the effective patch radius is 17 mm.
This size is the initial size for further steps to obtain the optimum result in resonant frequency after modifying the inset feedAos length and width, where the input impedance is 50 E.
Table 1 shows the parameters of the conventional Wfeed size that matches with impedance (Z.
of 50 E can be calculated by determining B using .
and then .
Therefore, the obtained calculated of Wfeed is 3 mm.
Defected Ground Structure (DGS) Design The conventional antenna ground is modified with rectangular slotting, as shown in Figure 3, to attain optimum gain and bandwidth.
This method is called a Defected Ground Structure (DGS).
DGS is a microstrip antenna technique by defecting some structure on the ground surface of microstrip planar for enhancing gain and bandwidth purposes .
Slotting size is represented by GW and GL , which are 33 mm and 45.
5 mm, respectively .
The design change influences the reflection factor at the center frequency, although it gave better bandwidth and gain.
The matching problemAos solution is to adjust the inset's dimension for the maximum reflection factor where IL 8.
8 mm is, and IW 55 mm.
Figure 4 shows the effect of the modifying size GL, where at a size range of 31 mm to 33 mm and the resonant frequency move around 2.
GHz.
Furthermore, from 33 mm to 35 mm, it went up to higher frequency.
The best reflection factor (S.
comes when the variable GL is 33 mm.
Figure 2 shows the conventional designAos reflection factor's simulation results, where the expected resonant frequency at 2.
4 GHz has a return loss value of -26.
27 dB.
Its bandwidth is 7 MHz, from 2360 MHz of a lower frequency 5 MHz of upper frequency.
The gain from the simulation result is 0.
64 dBi, respectively.
Figure 3.
DGS circular patch design Figure 2.
The simulated reflection factor of the conventional circular patch design Figure 4.
Iteration process of Rusdiyanto et al.
Bandwidth And Gain Enhancement Of Microstrip Antenna using A SINERGI Vol.
No.
June 2021: 153-158 Figure 4 represents the iteration result of DGS design.
It has 503.
9 MHz of bandwidth, 1 MHz to 2667 MHz.
At a frequency of 4 GHz, it obtains the reflection factor of -33.
Figure 5 shows the simulated gain result of DGS design that has 2.
37 dBi.
DGS design also has a reduced radius patch dimension, from 16.
mm to 15.
3 mm.
Still, when the circular patch is modified with a slit, the center frequency moves because of the The achieved optimum reflection factor 4 GHz is obtained after iteration of the width and length inset feed.
Modifying gap size causes alteration of the reflection factor at 2.
4 GHz, but the center frequency remains.
The best result is when the gap is given at 0.
5 mm, while under and over, its value obtained higher reflection factor, as shown in Figure 7.
The size of the inset feed length and width is 7 mm and 3.
55 mm, respectively.
There is no change in the slotting ground dimension and radius of the patch.
Figure 7 shows the simulated reflection factor of the DGSHPG design when adjusting the dimension of the gap.
It shows that at frequency 4 GHz, it obtains -53.
3 dB of reflection factor.
The bandwidth has achieved 764.
4 MHz, from 5 MHz to 2837.
9 MHz.
Figure 8 represents the gain of DGSHPG design from the far-field that has 2.
8 dBi.
Figure 5.
The simulated gain of DGS design Defected Ground Structure and Horizontal Patch Gap (DGSHPG) Design Based on the DGS design simulation result, this antenna will modify the bandwidth and gain improvement purposes.
The method is to add a horizontal slit in the middle of the circular patch that separates both or like a gap.
It is called the Horizontal Patch Gap (HPG).
When HPG is combined with DGS design, it will be DGSHPG.
Figure 6 shows the geometry of the DGSHPG antenna, where the gap patch has a symbol g.
Overall, the dimension circular patch and substrate using the HGP model is similar to DGS design.
Figure 7.
The simulated reflection factor of gap Figure 8.
The simulated gain of DGSHPG design Figure 6.
DGSHPG antenna design Rusdiyanto et al.
Bandwidth and Gain Enhancement of Microstrip Antenna using A p-ISSN: 1410-2331 e-ISSN: 2460-1217
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Three design stages deliver consideration that each design had experienced significant change, especially for bandwidth and gain The proposed design also generated optimum matching at the center frequency, as shown in Figure 9.
In this case, the widening bandwidth can work for Wi-Fi and can clearly outcome to the 4G band or S-Band The increasing bandwidth is extremely caused by DGS design because the defect on the ground plane changed current distribution.
This studyAos all design used a microstrip line as a planar transmission line with capacitance, inductance, and resistance structure.
When the slot model includes the ground plane, the current distribution will be more effective .
That caused a significant change from the DGS approximately more than 681.
7 MHz of bandwidth increment.
The proposed design (DGSHPG) produced more bandwidth, around 51%, compared to DGS design.
This result happened because of the change of radiation mechanism influenced by the mutual coupling Table 2 shows a comparison of the simulated result of each design.
Antenna design with a defective ground structure is combined with a horizontal gap demonstrated each DGSHPG achieved more matched in the reflection factor result, while its gain improved 0.
43 dBi from DGS gain result.
Another point that was achieved from the proposed design is reducing the circular patch compared to conventional design, from 7 mm to 15.
3 mm.
This reduction happened because of the need for impedance matching Some more increments in gain and bandwidth appear when the circular patch remains and impedance matching focus on inset feed or modification from the rectangular slot in the ground plane.
CONCLUSION
Antenna microstrip design using the defected ground and horizontal patch gap has shown improvement on more bandwidth and Furthermore.
DGSHPG design has an optimum result in impedance matching and gain and reduces the radius circular patchAos This increasing bandwidth can be applied for the wideband and multiband frequency used for applications.
Therefore, it can be concluded that this proposed design succeeded in enhancing antenna performance.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Universitas Mercu Buana supports this research through Internal Research Grant, the year 2019/2020, with a grant number: 025/846/B-SPK/IV/2020.
Figure 9.
Comparison of simulated reflection factor from each design Table 2.
Performance Comparison of Each Design
Parameter Lower
Frequency Upper
Frequency Bandwidth
Reflection GHz
Gain
Patch
Radius
Conventional 7 MHz
DGS
1 MHz
DGSHPG
5 MHz
4 MHz
2667 MHz
9 MHz
7 MHz
27 dB
9 MHz
6 dB
4 MHz
3 dB
64 dBi
7 mm 37 dBi
3 mm 8 dBi
3 mm REFERENCES