Journal of Economics Review (JOER) | November 2023 | Vol. 3 No. 2 | Page 110 – 118
ISSN: 2809-378X
DOI https://doi.org/10.55098/joer.2.1.1-8

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUSTAINABILITY AUDIT: CHALLENGES AND
OPPORTUNITIES IN THE DIGITAL ERA
Sumartono
Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Yapis Papua, Papua, Indonesia
destyatoro80@gmail.com

Abstract
As businesses face the challenges and opportunities brought by the digital age, performing sustainability audits
becomes important to evaluate and improve economic, social and environmental performance. school. The
literature review examines the current state of sustainability audit implementation in the digital age, focusing
on both obstacles and potential advances. It explores international sustainability reporting standards such as
the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), to promote
the adoption of sustainability auditing. However, the review also highlights the significant challenges faced
when conducting these audits in the digital age, including data privacy concerns, data security risks and The
digital divide affects small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). There are also concerns about the quality
and reliability of sustainability data due to issues such as greenwashing and inaccurate reporting. In short, the
digital age poses both challenges and opportunities for sustainability auditing. Companies working to comply
with the Sustainable Development Goals can leverage digital tools to improve their audit processes and overall
sustainability performance. This literature review aims to gain a deeper understanding of the complexities of
conducting sustainability audits in the digital age, providing insights to guide future research and practical
applications in this dynamic field.
Keywords: Implementation; Sustainability Audit; Challenges; Opportunities; Digital Era

INTRODUCTION
In an era marked by escalating concerns about the environment, social responsibility, and
ethical business practices, the concept of sustainability has garnered significant attention. Sustainability,
broadly defined as meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs, has evolved from a moral and ethical stance to a central driver of
business strategy. The circular economy (CE) period is seeing numerous breakthroughs in auditing,
most notably because of anthropogenic climate change, which powers today's economies and appears
to be a threat to the existence of the human species (Imoniana et al., 2021). Sustainability audits, a
vital component of this broader sustainability framework, play a pivotal role in assessing and enhancing
the environmental, social, and economic performance of organizations. This literature review aims to
delve into the implementation of sustainability audits, with a specific focus on the challenges and
opportunities presented by the digital era. A critical component of an entity's overall corporate
governance framework, audit committees serve as the focal point of communication between
management and external auditors (Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu et al., 2021).
The digital era, characterized by unprecedented advancements in technology, data processing,
and connectivity, has introduced both novel tools and complexities to the realm of sustainability audits.
The transition towards digitalization has revolutionized the way businesses collect, analyze, and report
sustainability-related data. In general, digital accounting practices examine how connected smart
technologies are incorporated into businesses, assets, and the general public (Mamidu, 2023). Nearly
every company on the planet is impacted by non-financial audits, which are a component of testing,
inspection, and certification (TIC) services (Castka & Searcy, 2023). This transformation has the
potential to enhance the accuracy, timeliness, and comprehensiveness of sustainability audits, offering
organizations the ability to respond to sustainability issues with greater agility. On-site audits were
contrasted with remote audits, and audits pertaining to optional management systems were contrasted
Copyright © Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the AttributionNonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Sumartono

with audits pertaining to required management systems (Kafel & Rogala, 2022). Auditing plays a
pivotal role in shedding light on whether malpractices have occurred in the process of making decisions
and deploying resources (Grossi et al., 2023).
The characteristics of fraud in the public sector that occur in the digital era include the use of
false information regarding the function of digital technology in the implementation of public
accountant duties, utilizing digital technology to maximize opportunities to commit fraud, taking
advantage of issues with human error and a lack of understanding of using digital technology, and using
digital technology products, such as cryptocurrencies, to carry out fraud (Kustinah, 2019). It is
essential to build trustworthy procedures for environmental audits and impact assessments in order to
monitor the ecological health and productivity of grazing agrolandscapes and ensure the sustainable use
of these unique resources (Plokhikh et al., 2023). Nevertheless, the integration of digital technologies
into sustainability audits is not without its share of challenges. Concerns related to data privacy,
security, the digital divide, and the credibility of sustainability data remain at the forefront of discussions
surrounding this transition. According to previous studies, using less paper is a benefit of an integrated
internal audit system. The number of sheets of paper used can be decreased if there is an internal audit
system that all units can view online (Khafid et al., 2023). Use of the MAT in clinical practice is a
feasible and acceptable way of auditing the quality of haemodialysis nursing practice (McIntyre et al.,
2023).
This literature review embarks on a comprehensive journey through the landscape of
sustainability audits, starting with an exploration of their fundamental role in promoting transparency,
accountability, and responsible business conduct. that the involvement of a component auditor in itself
is associated with higher audit quality (Carson et al., 2022). The worldwide reporting initiative and
the sustainability accounting standards board, which have greatly affected the adoption of sustainability
audits, are only two examples of the worldwide sustainability reporting standards and laws that are
examined in this study. Furthermore, the review delves into the various opportunities the digital era
presents for sustainability audits. It examines the potential of technologies like big data analytics,
artificial intelligence, and blockchain to revolutionize the way sustainability data is collected,
processed, and reported. These digital tools can empower organizations to identify environmental and
social risks, track their sustainability progress, and respond to the evolving demands of stakeholders
with a level of precision and efficiency previously unattainable. The bibliometric study demonstrates
patterns in the publications in the fields of auditing and sustainability accounting, demonstrating that
compliance audit is a burgeoning topic and still has issues with mainstream accounting and auditing
research (Thottoli et al., 2022).
On the flip side, this literature review highlights the challenges that must be navigated as
sustainability audits enter the digital realm. Issues surrounding data privacy, the security of sensitive
information, and the accessibility of digital resources for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
are explored. Additionally, the review underscores the persistent problem of greenwashing and
inaccurate reporting, which can undermine the credibility of sustainability audits. According to
conventional thinking, investors gain from audit engagement partner name disclosure by learning more
about the partners' performance (Eulerich et al., 2023). A core aspect of sustainability audits is
stakeholder engagement, which has assumed even greater significance in the digital era. Businesses are
now interacting with their stakeholders through a variety of digital channels, and the way they engage
with these stakeholders can significantly impact the credibility and effectiveness of sustainability audits.
This literature review seeks to contribute to a more profound understanding of the intricacies of
sustainability audit implementation in the digital era. As businesses strive to align their operations with
sustainability goals, they are presented with a unique set of challenges and opportunities, shaped by the
digital landscape in which they operate. By examining these complexities, this review aims to inform
future research endeavors and practical applications, ultimately aiding organizations in their pursuit of
responsible and sustainable business practices.

112

Sumartono

METHOD
The method used refers to the method used by Claessens et al., (2008) to obtain relevant
scientific literature. Initially, a rigorous search was conducted across leading academic databases,
including but not limited to PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and JSTOR, using a combination
of keywords such as "sustainability audit", "digital age", "sustainability reporting standards", "big data
analysis", "artificial intelligence", and "blockchain". The search was limited to peer-reviewed articles
and publications published within a certain timeframe to ensure relevance and currency of information.
Articles that addressed the implementation of sustainability audits in the context of the digital age were
carefully selected based on their relevance to the research topic and alignment with the research
objectives. After the initial screening, relevant articles were reviewed in depth to extract key insights,
methodologies, challenges, and opportunities related to the integration of digital technologies in the
sustainability audit process. An analytical framework was used to categorize and synthesize the
findings, allowing for a structured and cohesive presentation of the literature insights. During the review
process, attention was paid to the credibility, methodology, and empirical basis of the selected literature
to ensure the validity and reliability of the information presented in this review. The synthesized
information was then organized and articulated in the form of this comprehensive literature review, thus
providing a balanced and insightful understanding of the challenges and opportunities of sustainability
audit implementation in the digital age.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The audit committee is in charge of the internal control audit, including the relevant
management letter reporting, in accordance with the audit agreement (Christensen, 2022). In
examining the intersection of sustainability audits and the digital era, this literature review delves into
the evolving landscape of sustainability reporting, emphasizing its role in fostering responsible business
practices. The interaction between the government and the governed, the executive and the legislative,
and other sectors of the government is supported by the public sector audit, which is an essential
function in democratic regimes (Ferry et al., 2022). The incorporation of sustainability audits into
corporate governance has been prompted by the growth of sustainability reporting standards and laws
like the global reporting initiative and the sustainability accounting standards board. Investors are likely
to perceive the audit firm as having self-serving incentives to deny responsibilities and to distance
themselves from the negative inspection findings if the audit firm takes defensive actions to minimize
responsibility despite the significant crisis responsibilities stakeholders have assigned to the audit firm
(Huang et al., 2022). One aspect of audit quality has been identified by prior research on audit report
quality (Honkamäki et al., 2022). This is of particular interest in the context of recent regulation
concerned with investor perceptions of audit quality (Friedrich et al., 2020). Extend this investigation
by taking into account the technologies used by the audit company for business risk audits (Cahan et
al., 2022).
To assess uterine rupture results from local audits around the country and develop conclusions
for clinical treatment (Rosman et al., 2022). With the onset of the digital era, the audit process has
been substantially enhanced through the utilization of advanced technologies such as big data analytics,
artificial intelligence, and blockchain. Accounting and auditing assistance for its management is crucial
to a system of rational forest management because it enables the monitoring, documentation, and
dependability verification of all parties involved in the financial and commercial activities of forest user
(Nazarova et al., 2020). These tools enable more efficient data processing, real-time reporting, and
in-depth analysis, offering promising opportunities to bolster the accuracy and effectiveness of
sustainability audits. The audit ecosystem may include the ability for multi-agent systems to interact
with the specific data being audited at a specific time, with each agent performing the specific audit
tasks assigned to it as well as working cooperatively with other agents performing their specific audit
tasks to achieve higher goals than could be achieved individually (Huy & Phuc, 2023). Our findings
add to our understanding of a possible factor that influences audit fees and suggest that auditors may
have distinct perspectives of companies with and without government contracts (Dao et al., 2023).

Sumartono

According to auditing standards, auditors must give a reasonable level of assurance that there are no
substantial misstatements in the financial statements (Backof et al., 2022).
The relationship between input auditing and the accuracy of accounting information was
insignificant (Alrabei, 2023). According to audit studies, audit fees are discounted after an auditor
change and return to typical levels within a short period of time (Goddard & Schmidt, 2021).
Nevertheless, this review underscores several challenges that arise in the digital realm. Concerns
regarding data privacy, security, and the potential for inaccurate reporting due to greenwashing persist
as major hurdles. All primary healthcare providers in England and Wales as well as all specialists in
England are expected to participate in the audit (Holman et al., 2021). The digital divide further
exacerbates the situation, hindering equitable access to digital resources, particularly for small and
medium-sized enterprises. Our findings provide information on the conditions employee representatives
should satisfy in order to minimize any possible harm to the quality of the audit (Hillebrandt &
Ratzinger-Sakel, 2021). Financial reporting and audit quality may be impacted by various positions
within audited firms (Baumann & Ratzinger-Sakel, 2020). Since our audit was conducted during a
pandemic, clinics may have participated less, which could have introduced bias. This is especially true
if participating clinics were able to treat a larger proportion of people who had coinfections than nonparticipating clinics (Raya et al., 2023). Audit companies have voiced regret that this rotation
requirement may lead to partners being allocated to customers who are more far geographically, and
have expressed worry that long commutes may have a negative impact on client service and audit
quality (Francis et al., 2022).
The methodical approach required the creation of particular guidelines for organizing and
conducting audits on a digital platform (Barretto et al., 2022). In several nations, significant
modifications have been made to the auditing procedures for local government (de Widt et al., 2022).
The quality and reliability of sustainability data are critical aspects that demand attention to ensure the
credibility and authenticity of sustainability audits. The economic data created by ecological audit and
accounting information systems for small-scale management themes (Nesterenko et al., 2021).
Additionally, as digital channels increasingly shape stakeholder engagement, maintaining open and
transparent communication with stakeholders remains fundamental to upholding the integrity of
sustainability audits and overall sustainability initiatives. For CT number calibration audits by outside
parties, stoichiometric CT number calibration based on standard tissue data is helpful (Nakao et al.,
2020). We discover that variations owing to sociological features appear to be significant in the conduct
of audits, in addition to the fact that economic and regulatory characteristics account for the majority of
variances in audit price between nations (Eierle et al., 2021). It is established that the forestry system's
economic, environmental, social, informational, organizational, and other subsystems make up the topic
of internal economic and environmental audit (Nazarova et al., 2021).
Both the commercial sector and the government are aggressively advancing the concept of
digital audit. The efficacy of auditing should be improved by the use of information technology (Zueva,
2020). Due to its idiosyncrasies, internal auditing most likely reflects the major procedures valued in
this progression. Academics have emphasized throughout the years that internal auditing techniques are
directly interested in technology advancement because of their inherent qualities (Pizzi et al., 2021).
Although environmental auditing, also known as environmental assessment, has grown in popularity in
the last ten years, most developed economies have been concerned about it for a very long time. Audit
fees and the quality of financial re- ports as reflected in discretionary accruals (Azizkhani et al., 2023).
By providing useful advice for establishing the function of IT audit in the age of digital transformation,
the findings of this study can advance the area of modern IT audit (Aditya et al., 2018; Pizzi et al.,
2021). Business intelligence audit software, database applications, and electronic audit working papers
are just a few examples of the software that is included into computer-assisted audit tools and techniques
(CAATTs) (Al-Okaily et al., 2022).
As suggested by the name, a digital sustainability audit tries to highlight the requirements that
must be met during the website creation, production, and maintenance phases in order to maintain
sustainability (Álvarez, 2020). The information age's arrival has accelerated the process of digitization,
and the state has given digital audits more priority (Lou, 2023). The digital era has ushered in a

114

Sumartono

transformative phase for sustainability audits, presenting both unprecedented opportunities and
complex challenges. For major businesses, an alternative to publicly affirm and legitimize their
corporate corporate digital responsibility policies inside their global operations and supply chains may
be independent audits of corporate digital responsibility policies and actions (Wynn & Jones, 2023).
Harnessing digital tools can significantly improve the audit process, aligning businesses with
sustainability objectives. As a solution to their worry that auditors fail to adequately respond to
substantial misstatements, audit authorities and pundits suggest encouraging auditors to take an
investor's perspective more seriously (Altiero et al., 2022; Castka et al., 2020; Jain et al., 2021;
van Raak et al., 2020). Balanced and cautious approach is vital to navigate the intricacies of data
management, security, and equitable access, ensuring the continued effectiveness and credibility of
sustainability audits. This literature review offers valuable insights to guide future research and practical
applications in this evolving landscape, aiming to foster responsible and sustainable business practices.
This result was seen as being consistent with price competitiveness in the audit industry (Hrazdil et
al., 2020).
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the implementation of sustainability audits in the digital era presents a dynamic
landscape filled with both challenges and opportunities. As organizations worldwide recognize the
imperative of sustainable practices, sustainability audits have become instrumental in assessing and
enhancing their environmental, social, and economic performance. The advent of digital technology has
ushered in a new era for sustainability audits, offering powerful tools for data collection, analysis, and
reporting. These digital advancements hold promise for more accurate and real-time sustainability
reporting, enabling businesses to identify risks and respond to stakeholder demands with agility.
However, this digital transformation is not without its share of challenges. Data privacy concerns, data
security risks, and the digital divide pose significant hurdles, potentially limiting access to digital
resources for smaller enterprises and casting doubts on data integrity. Moreover, the credibility of
sustainability audits is contingent on the quality and reliability of sustainability data, raising concerns
about greenwashing and inaccurate reporting. Amidst these challenges and opportunities, stakeholder
engagement emerges as a linchpin for the success of sustainability audits. Businesses must actively
engage with stakeholders through digital channels to foster transparency and accountability, ensuring
the credibility of sustainability audits and the broader sustainability agenda. As businesses continue to
grapple with the complexities of the digital era, this literature review contributes to a deeper
understanding of the multifaceted landscape of sustainability audit implementation. It serves as a
guiding compass for future research and practical applications, emphasizing the importance of
balancing the benefits of digital technology with the imperative of maintaining transparency, credibility,
and ethical sustainability practices. In the pursuit of a more sustainable future, the digital era offers the
tools for transformation, but it is the judicious and responsible use of these tools that will ultimately
determine the success of sustainability audits and the broader mission of fostering sustainable business
practices.
REFERENCES

Aditya, B. R., Hartanto, R., & Nugroho, L. E. (2018). The Role of IT Audit in the Era of Digital
Transformation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 407(1).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/407/1/012164
Al-Okaily, M., Alqudah, H. M., Al-Qudah, A. A., & Alkhwaldi, A. F. (2022). Examining the
Critical Factors of Computer-Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques Adoption in the PostCOVID-19 Period: Internal Auditors Perspective. VINE Journal of Information and
Knowledge Management Systems, May. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-12-2021-0311
Alrabei, A. M. (2023). Green Electronic Auditing and Accounting Information Reliability in
the Jordanian Social Security Corporation: The Mediating Role of Cloud Computing.
International
Journal
of
Financial
Studies,
11(3),
114.

Sumartono

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11030114
Altiero, E. C., Kang, Y. J., & Peecher, M. E. (2022). Motivated Perspective Taking: Why
Prompting Auditors to Take an Investor’s Perspective Makes Them Treat Identified Audit
Differences as Less Material*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(1), 339–370.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12721
Álvarez, M. (2020). Digital Sustainability Audits: a de Facto Standard for the Internet Carbon
Footprint.
Azizkhani, M., Hossain, S., & Nguyen, M. (2023). Effects of Audit Committee Chair
Characteristics on Auditor Choice, Audit Fee and Audit Quality. Accounting and Finance,
63(3), 3675–3707. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13058
Backof, A. G., Bowlin, K., & Goodson, B. M. (2022). The Importance of Clarification of
Auditors’ Responsibilities Under the New Audit Reporting Standards*. Contemporary
Accounting Research, 39(4), 2284–2304. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12802
Barretto, C. R., Drumond, G. M., & Méxas, M. P. (2022). Remote Audit in the Times of
COVID-19: a Successful Process Safety Initiative. Brazilian Journal of Operations and
Production Management, 19(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2021.048
Baumann, M. F., & Ratzinger-Sakel, N. V. S. (2020). The Time Dependence of Audit Firm
Alumni Effects: Evidence from Audit Committees. International Journal of Auditing,
24(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12182
Cahan, S. F., Che, L., Knechel, W. R., & Svanström, T. (2022). Do Audit Teams Affect Audit
Production and Quality? Evidence from Audit Teams’ Industry Knowledge*.
Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(4), 2657–2695. https://doi.org/10.1111/19113846.12807
Carson, E., Simnett, R., Thürheimer, U., & Vanstraelen, A. (2022). Involvement of Component
Auditors in Multinational Group Audits: Determinants, Audit Quality, and Audit Fees.
Journal of Accounting Research, 60(4), 1419–1462. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475679X.12418
Castka, P., & Searcy, C. (2023). Audits and COVID-19: A Paradigm Shift in the Making.
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, January, 5–11.
Castka, P., Searcy, C., & Mohr, J. (2020). Technology-Enhanced Auditing: Improving Veracity
and Timeliness in Social and Environmental Audits of Supply Chains. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 258(April 2013), 120773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120773
Christensen, L. (2022). Internal Audit: A Case Study of Impact and Quality of an Internal
Control
Audit.
International
Journal
of
Auditing,
26(3),
339–353.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12280
Claessens, P., Menten, J., Schotsmans, P., & Broeckaert, B. (2008). Palliative Sedation: A
Review of the Research Literature. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 36(3),
310–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.10.004
Dao, M., Pham, T., & Xu, H. (2023). Government Contracts and Audit Fees. International
Journal of Auditing, 27(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12298
de Widt, D., Llewelyn, I., & Thorogood, T. (2022). Stakeholder Attitudes Towards Audit
Credibility in English Local Government: A Post-Audit Commission Analysis. Financial
Accountability and Management, 38(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12267
Eierle, B., Hartlieb, S., Hay, D. C., Niemi, L., & Ojala, H. (2021). Importance of Country

116

Sumartono

Factors for Global Differences in Audit Pricing: New Empirical Evidence. International
Journal of Auditing, 25(2), 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12222
Eulerich, M., Masli, A., Pickerd, J., & Wood, D. A. (2023). The Impact of Audit Technology
on Audit Task Outcomes: Evidence for Technology-Based Audit Techniques*.
Contemporary Accounting Research, 40(2), 981–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/19113846.12847
Ferry, L., Radcliffe, V. S., & Steccolini, I. (2022). The future of Public Audit. Financial
Accountability and Management, 38(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12339
Francis, J. R., Golshan, N., & Hallman, N. J. (2022). Does Distance Matter? An Investigation
of Partners Who Audit Distant Clients and the Effects on Audit Quality†. Contemporary
Accounting Research, 39(2), 947–981. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12744
Friedrich, C., Quick, R., & Schmidt, F. (2020). Auditor-Provided Non-Audit Services and
Perceived Audit Quality: Evidence from the Cost of Equity and Debt Capital.
International Journal of Auditing.
Goddard, F., & Schmidt, M. (2021). Exploratory Insights into Audit Fee Increases: A Field
Study into Board Member Perceptions of Auditor Pricing Practices. International Journal
of Auditing, 25(3), 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12242
Grossi, G., Hay, D. C., Kuruppu, C., & Neely, D. (2023). Changing the Boundaries of
Public Sector Auditing. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial
Management, 35(6), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-05-2023-0079
Hillebrandt, S., & Ratzinger-Sakel, N. V. S. (2021). Codetermination on the Audit Committee:
An Analysis of Potential Effects on Audit Quality. International Journal of Auditing,
25(2), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12213
Holman, N., Knighton, P., Wild, S. H., Sattar, N., Dew, C., Gregg, E. W., Khunti, K., Valabhji,
J., & Young, B. (2021). Cohort Profile: National Diabetes Audit for England and Wales.
Diabetic Medicine, 38(9), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14616
Honkamäki, T., Mättö, M., & Teittinen, H. (2022). The Homogeneity of BIG4 Audit Reports
After the Implementation of key Audit Matters in the Context of Fair Value Accounting.
International Journal of Auditing, 26(3), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12285
Hrazdil, K., Simunic, D. A., & Suwanyangyuan, N. (2020). Are the Big 4 Audit Firms
Homogeneous? Further Evidence from Audit Pricing. International Journal of Auditing,
24(3), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12198
Huang, X., Ko, J. C. W., & Phang, S. Y. (2022). Effects of Regulatory Enforcement Style and
Audit Firm Remedial Actions on Investors’ Perceptions of Audit Quality. International
Journal of Auditing, 26(4), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12295
Huy, P. Q., & Phuc, V. K. (2023). Unfolding Sustainable Auditing Ecosystem Formation Path
Through Digitalization Transformation: How Digital Intelligence of Accountant Fosters
the
Digitalization
Capabilities.
Heliyon,
9(2),
e13392.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13392
Imoniana, J. O., Silva, W. L., Reginato, L., Slomski, V., & Slomski, V. G. (2021). Sustainable
Technologies for the Transition of Auditing Towards a Circular Economy. Sustainability
(Switzerland), 13(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010218
Jain, N., Moore, C. B., Quinn, E., Liu, H. M., Liu, D., Heaton, M., Gehlot, P., Dhakal, Y.,
Gupta, L., Hogbin, R., & Eastwood, J. G. (2021). Audit of the Sydney Local Health

Sumartono

District Public Health Unit Notification and Contact Tracing System During the First
Wave of COVID-19. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 45(5), 526–
530. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13145
Kafel, P., & Rogala, P. (2022). Auditing Management Systems in Digital Transformation Era.
International
Journal
for
Quality
Research,
16(1),
193–206.
https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR16.01-13
Khafid, M., Suryandari, D., Hidayah, R., Dahlan, T. A., Husna, D. R., & Kayati, I. N. (2023).
Environmental Sustainability : Insight into Paperless Policy and Integrated Audit Internal
System Environmental Sustainability : Insight into Paperless Policy and Integrated Audit
Internal System. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1248.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1248/1/012008
Kustinah, S. (2019). Implementation of Public Sector Accounting to Handle Fraud in the Public
Sector in the Digital Era. INFLUENCE : International Journal of Science Review, 1(3),
25–35. https://doi.org/10.54783/influence.v1i3.188
Lou, J. (2023). Research and Analysis of the Impact of Company Digitalization on Auditing. 9,
719–728.
Mamidu, A. (2023). The Akungba Administrator and Management Scientist (TAAMS) Digital
Accounting Practices and Audit Performance in Nigeria : a. September.
McIntyre, D., McGuire, A., & Bonner, A. (2023). Feasibility of the McIntyre audit Tool For
Haemodialysis Nurses. Journal of Renal Care, April. https://doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12477
Nakao, M., Ozawa, S., Miura, H., Yamada, K., Habara, K., Hayata, M., Kusaba, H., Kawahara,
D., Miki, K., Nakashima, T., Ochi, Y., Tsuda, S., Seido, M., Morimoto, Y., Kawakubo,
A., Nozaki, H., & Nagata, Y. (2020). Development of a CT Number Calibration Audit
Phantom in Photon Radiation Therapy: A Pilot Study. Medical Physics, 47(4), 1509–
1522. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14077
Nazarova, K., Hotsuliak, V., Miniailo, V., Nezhyva, M., & Mysiuk, V. (2020). Accounting,
Analysis and Environmental Audit as an Imperative of the Development of Green
Economy in the State’s Economic Security System. E3S Web of Conferences, 166.
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016613003
Nazarova, K., Nezhyva, M., Kucher, A., Hotsuliak, V., Melnyk, T., & Zaremba, O. (2021).
Environmental Audit in the Sustainable Development of Green Economy. European
Journal
of
Sustainable
Development,
10(3),
273.
https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n3p273
Nesterenko, O. O., Kovalevska, N. S., & Nesterenko, I. V. (2021). Audit of Integrated
Reporting In Context.
Pizzi, S., Venturelli, A., Variale, M., & Macario, G. P. (2021). Assessing the Impacts of Digital
Transformation on Internal Auditing: A Bibliometric Analysis. Technology in Society,
67(August). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101738
Plokhikh, R., Shokparova, D., Fodor, G., Berghauer, S., Tóth, A., Suymukhanov, U.,
Zhakupova, A., Varga, I., Zhu, K., & Dávid, L. D. (2023). Towards Sustainable Pasture
Agrolandscapes: A Landscape-Ecological-Indicative Approach to Environmental Audits
and
Impact
Assessments.
Sustainability
(Switzerland),
15(8).
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086913
Raya, R. P., Curtis, H., Kulasegaram, R., Cooke, G. S., Burns, F., Chadwick, D., & Sabin, C.

118

Sumartono

A. (2023). The British HIV Association National Clinical Audit 2021: Management of
HIV and Hepatitis C Coinfection. HIV Medicine, 24(4), 471–479.
https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.13417
Rosman, A. N., van Dillen, J., Zwart, J., Overtoom, E., Schaap, T., Bloemenkamp, K., & van
den Akker, T. (2022). Lessons Learned from the Perinatal Audit of Uterine Rupture in the
Netherlands: A Mixed-Method Study. Health Science Reports, 5(5).
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.664
Thottoli, M. M., Islam, M. A., Sobhani, F. A., Rahman, S., & Hassan, M. S. (2022). Auditing
and Sustainability Accounting: A Global Examination Using the Scopus Database.
Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(23), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316323
van Raak, J., Peek, E., Meuwissen, R., & Schelleman, C. (2020). The Effect of Audit Market
Structure on Audit Quality and Audit Pricing in the Private-Client Market. Journal of
Business Finance and Accounting, 47(3–4), 456–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12414
Wynn, M., & Jones, P. (2023). Corporate Responsibility in the Digital Era. Information
(Switzerland), 14(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14060324
Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu, Y., Wallage, P., Emanuels, J., & Gold, A. (2021). Audit Committee
Strength and Auditors’ Risk Assessments: The Moderating Role of CEO Narcissism.
International Journal of Auditing.
Zueva, A. (2020). Geoinformation System as a Controlling Tool for External State Audit
Bodies. Annual Geospatial Almanac, 8(1).