The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on AFEBI Management and Business Review at: https://journal.afebi.org/index.php/ambr/article/view/739 MEDIATING EFFECT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND EMPLOYEES PERFORMANCE IN LEBANESE UNIVERSITIES Mediating Effect of Emotional Intelligence on the Relationship Ali Hassan Ezzeddine*, Yasmin Ahmad, Amani Ali Elmetwaly between Department of Communication, Faculty of Buisiness and Communication, Transformational University Malaysia Perlis, Malaysia Leadership and Employees Abstract Performance in The effectiveness of individual employee’ performance depends on the leader/supervisor. Effective Lebanese leader can enhance the individual employee performance through proper leadership style and retain high Universities performance and talent employees within the company. The behavior of leader is very importance to improve job performance and retain skillful employees for longer period in the organization. This study aims to investigate the mediating effect emotional intelligent on the relationship between transformational leadership and employees’ performance in Lebanese Universities. Three main variables consist in conceptual framework. They are independent variables (transformational leadership style), mediating variable (emotional intelligent) and dependent variable (employee performance). A sample of 400 respondents has been randomly selected from top four universities in Lebanon. Sample was selected by using simple random method and primary data was collected through structured questionnaires. Data analysis was conducted by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 23.0) and Smart-PLS 3.0. Results showed the significant contribution of 38.9 percent from transformational leadership and emotional intelligent on employees’ performance. Emotional intelligent also played a significant role as a mediator in the relationship between transformational leadership and employees’ performance. The outcomes of this study offered substantial empirical support to the research framework from a theoretical and managerial perspective. Received June 4th 2023 Review June 28th 2023 Publish June 30th 2023 Keywords: Employees Performance, Transformational Leadership, Emotional Intelligent. * Corresponding author. Email addresses: ali.ezzeddien@gmail.com AFEBI Management and Business Review (AMBR) P-ISSN2548- 530X E-ISSN2548-5318 35 AMBR INTRODUCTION Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) stated that Covid-19 has had a significant Firms Concept and application of effective leadership seems to be an inevitable element of life in groups and a necessary prerequisite for coordinating the behavior of individuals, group members and organizations in the pursuit of common goals. Superb leaders have very different ways of directing a team, a division, or a company (Goleman, 2018). The emergence of the concept of leadership in different life domains has been prevalent in the recent years. This concept is actually seen as necessary and crucial for theeffective operation and function of any organization. Fundamentally, leadership is characterized by its persuading power on human resources, organization’s source of competitive advantage, and the achieved results. While trying to sway followers and harness more members in an organization with respect to their roles, leaders mush work onimproving employees’ motivation levels due to that fact that engaging them in the work process ensures achieving desired goals (Batista-Taran et al., 2009). Previous works of literature have focused on leadership styles and have examined employees’ engagement at work and the consequences of such an involvement (Bakker and Demerouti, 2008; Kim, 2014; Park et al., 2013; Saks, 2006; Salanova et al., 2011; Salanova and Schaufeli, 2008; Schaufeli and Bakker, 2004; Song et al., 2012; Xathopoulo et al., 2007). It has been found out that benefitting from available resources, social exchange theories, social cognitive theories, and leadership has been quite crucial and implicative. Within the plethora of researches and studies in relation to employee engagement and leadership styles in Western and Asian contexts, persona attributes perceived support, learning organizations, and transformational leadership have been considered significant in having a better citizenship behavior at the organization, proactive behavior, innovative mentality, and knowledgeable decisions. Regardless of theseveral studies on the relation between work engagement and other factors, little research has been conducted in relation to the potential correlation and association between leadership behaviors and organizational performance (Carasco-Saul et al., 2015). Previous works of literature have focused on leadership styles and have examined employees’ engagement at work and the consequences of such an involvement (Bakker and Demerouti, 2008; Kim, 2014; Park et al., 2013; Saks, 2006; Salanova et al., 2011; Salanova and Schaufeli, 2008; Schaufeli and Bakker, 2004; Song et al., 2012; Xathopoulo et al., 2007). It has been found out that benefitting from available resources, social exchange theories, social cognitive theories, and leadership has been quite crucial and implicative. Within the plethora of researches and studies in relation to employee engagement and leadership styles in Western and Asian contexts, persona attributes perceived support, learning organizations, and transformational leadership have been considered significant in having a better citizenship behavior at the organization, proactive behavior, innovative mentality, and knowledgeable decisions. Regardless of the several studies on the relation between emotional intelligence and other factors, little research has been conducted in relation to the potential correlation and association between leadership behaviors and emotional intelligence as well as employees’ performance (Carasco-Saul et al., 2015). More recent studies have focused on the individual characteristics of leadership and leadership effectiveness. The emergence of transformational, transactional, and charismatic leadership styles combined can be more greatly defined as an interactional approach. Forsyth’s (2017) interactional approach defines leadership as “a reciprocal, transactional, and transformational process in which individuals are permitted to influence and motivate others to promote and achieve the attainment of group and individual goals” (p. 216). Leadership even through all the models and discussion depicted above, leaves one aspect unanswered, is it nature or nurture? Rapid changes in organizational success and commitment in this age of globalization require leaders to be adaptive, customer focused, fore thinking of systems and process improvement, effective workers, and at most, shares the efforts of the bottom line. To meet this challenge, one needs to understand why there are leaders that succeed at all levels of management and execution. Leaders need to idealize and mentor the behaviors and key elements of future leaders to lead effective outcomes. In the words of Goleman, Boyatzis, and McKee (2019), Great leaders move us. They ignite our passion and inspire the best in us. When we try to explain why they are so effective, we speak of strategy, vision, or powerful ideas. 36 While examining the relations among leadership styles, employee emotional intelligence and Mediating Effect of Emotional work results have been always emphasized. This leadership concept has been the target of several Intelligence on previous researches (Xu and Thomas, 2011; Carasco-Saul et al.,2015). More elucidations on the scarcity of the findings in the correlation of the styles withthe performance of employees have been noticed. the Relationship between Furthermore, leadership mostly has a dominant capacity over other work variables and has considerable, Transformational vulnerable modifications in relations to work outcomes and emotional intlelligence of employees. Leadership and There’s an evident lack of empirical and factual study that displays the factors which determine Employees Performance in this performance. Moreover, since the leadership style and emotional intelligence followed are a main Lebanese contributor in affecting the level of performance, this study aims to understand the manifestation of the Universities leadership style and emotional intelligence followed in higher institutions in Lebanon. Hence, the key question is to what extent does the emotional intelligent mediates the relationship between leadership style especially transformational leadership style and employees’ job performance in Lebanese higher institutions? RQ1: Is there any relationship between transformational leadership style and employees’ performance in Lebanese universities? RQ2: Is there any relationship between emotional intelligence and employees’ performance in Lebanese universities? RQ: Does the relationship between transformational leadership style and employees’ performance mediated by emotional intelligent? LITTERATURE REVIEW Employees’ Performance All the activities related to a particular job revolve around certain expectations of a workerand how they are executed and managed to achieve the organization’s goals. It happens in several institutions where the employees’ performance is assessed by personnel directors, annually or quarterly in order to recommend some changes, aiming at improving productivityand performance (Kelly Burkart, 2019). Several organizations nowadays put extensive efforts into guaranteeing and enhancing employees’ competency, productivity, communication skills,commitment, cooperation, and professionalism (Kelly Burkart, 2019). According to empirical literation on the relation between leadership styles and employees’ performance, several authors have found out that autocratic and laissez-faire leadership styleshave direct results on employees’ performance more directly. Both the transformational and transactional leadership styles work in coordination in order to bring out motivated employees in the workplace. This notion goes hand-in-hand with Bass’ theory (Yukl, 1998) which considers the transformational leadership styles as the best approachwhich can arouse or encourage employees to be prosperous and thriving at work. In the same light, David (2002) states that there are some important factors which affect the performance of employees at work, and motivation is a rudimentary factor. When employees have high motivation levels at work, the transformational leadership styles, if implemented, would affect their performance by epitomizing it (David, 2002). However, the transactional leaders highlight the notion that the leader should be able to recognize and identify the needs of their employees and how they should be better addressed to achieve the goals of the organization (David, 2002). Therefore, in order to motivate workers to do their duties more effectively, transactional leaders tend to emphasize the establishment of reward and punishment systems (Luthans, 2016). These systems constitute a motivation in themselves for the workers. Thus, motivation results from the act of encouraging leaders to fulfill the needs of their followers (Luthans, 2016). Employee performance appears then to be affected by motivation and vice versa. The transactional leadership styles also have a direct impact on employee performance.This meets what Haryadi (2003) has asserted. The positive effect of this kind of styles on employees’ performance takes place when the latter assess this style from a positive point of view, and can have negative implications when employees have tendencies to be dishonest, distrustful, and disloyal (Haryadi, 2003). Furthermore, Andarika (2004) and Ahn et al. (2005) confirm that transactional leadership styles have significant 37 AMBR impacts on the performance of employees and more positively. Through this, the subordinate groups will reciprocate by showing maximum work efforts. Transformational Leadership Style The transformational leadership style, according to Jyoti and Bhau (2015), is regarded as the process that motivates and encourages the followers in a positive sense as it appeals to better ideas and entrenched internal moral and ethical values to be sustained throughout the workplace. Besides, Puni et al. (2018) stat that this leadership style recognizes the needs of thesubordinates and finds ways to meet them within full involvement. On the other hand, Jyoti and Bhau (2015) contend that if a leader is described as being good, then there should be a marriage adoption between transactional and transformational leaderships, as they can both complement each other. Besides, Chan and Mak (2014) confirm that this leadership style pivotsthe personality and character of the leader as a key influence to affect and bring about positive changes. This happens by having a clear motivating vision and energizing goals and attitudesto improve the performance of employees. Similarly, Zwingmann et al. (2014) hinge on the main concept which underpins this theory through the belief that transformational leaders seek changes and modifications in values, ethics, thoughts, norms, traditions, and attitudes by affecting them to act in a way that goes beyond their threshold. This perspective is reinforcedby Sun et al. (2014) who suggest that transformational leadership can be highly inspirational, and leaders can play an efficacious role in changing the attitudes and perspectives of their employees’’ for the benefit of the whole organization. Such authors state that their perspective revolves around aiding the subordinate groups throughout the process of change and motivating them to critically think of how their performance influences the entire organization(Sun et al., 2014). Furthermore, this is supported by Al Khajeh (2018) who insists on the fact that this form of leadership concentrates on establishing a generic value system for the employees in an organization and focuses on upgrading their morals, abilities, potentials, and inspirations. Al Khajeh (2018) also postulates that the transformational leaders act as mediocre or mediator in the process of developing an understanding of the inspirations, values, and interests. In this regard, while trying to evaluate how leadership’s impact on the well-being of employees within transformative or transactional leadership theoretical styles, Zwingmann et al. (2014) find that guaranteeing a positive environment leads to the development of a better attitude or work perception. On a similar basis, Wang et al. (2011) and Sofi & Devanadhen (2015) strongly argue that transformational leaders importantly impact the performance of workers byaffecting their motivation, morale, and potentials. This relation between the transformational style and the employees’ performance has been emphasized by Xu and Wang (2008) who note that it results from a developed performance, and what lie behind this are enhanced skills andcapabilities, know-how and motivation for employees, and promoted organizational interests. The leadership expert James MacGregor Burns was the first to introduce thetransformational leadership style in 1978. According to Burns (1978), there are four key dimensions which govern the implementation of this theory, and they are: professional effect like confidence and trustworthiness, inspirational motivation, intellectual trigger, and individualized consideration. These dimensions play an effective role in allowing leaders to act as powerful role models in creating more productive individuals (Hay, 2000). Moreover, transformational leaders should have a high sense of intellectual motivation, as they should instill motivation and enthusiasm in the employees’ spirits, and this eventually encourages them to be more concentrated on the collective well-being and the ultimate goals of the organization (Aydin, Sarier, and Uysal, 2013; Cho and Dansereau, 2010). For these reasons, the behaviors of transformational leaders are effective in bringing change to employee by making them more aware of the outcomes of their work activities, and this helps activate theirhigher order needs and expand their abilities beyond their self-interests (Bass and Avolio, 2000). Moreover, Avolio, Walumbwa and Weber (2009) state that transformational leadership helps employees to perform tasks in an organization in a manner which goes beyond the expectations, and this is achieved through the process of transcending self-interest for the whole goodness of the workplace. Thus, transformational leaders adopt a more socialized and emotionally intelligent character (McKee, 2014). They are also highly charismatic and know how to guard, trigger, and express their emptions (McKee, 2014) 38 Lastly, they have a clear vision in order to boost excitement, hopefulness, and inspiration among Mediating Effect of Emotional employees. Jin (2010)suggests that transformational leaders have a high potential in integrating values Intelligence on like empathy, affection, compassion, sensitivity, innovation, and socialization. Those leaders also the Relationship include elements of shared decision-making process (Aldoory and Toth, 2014). Therefore, being ableto between re-invent the entire philosophy, mission statement, vision, system, and culture of organization is Transformational Leadership and facilitated through transformational leadership (. Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelyand Konopaske, 2012). Based on the above review, this study developed the following hypothesis: H1: There is significant relationship between transformational leadership style and employees’ performance. Employees Performance in Lebanese Universities Emotional Intelligence Emotional intelligence is being able to understand one’s own feelings, how others are feeling and how those feelings can affect one another. It is the capacity to be in control of one’s emotions and leverage that to produce meaningful relationships, enhance leadership skills and allow for deeper connections and understanding to take place. Generally, the four basic domains of emotional intelligence that is widely accepted include self-awareness, self-management, social awareness and relationship management. Learning, developing and exercising these domains will vary between each individual and the level of mastery they will adopt but those who master the skill should have greater potential as successful leaders. According to Mathew and Gupta (2015), emotionally intelligent leaders are thought to perform better in the workplace, be happier and more dedicated to their organization, take advantage of emotions and use them to foresee major improvements in organizational functioning, improve decision making, solve problems, instill a sense of enthusiasm, excitement, trust and cooperation in other employees through interpersonal relationships. The concept of emotional intelligence stems from the theory and studies of Thorndike and Stein’s (1937) conceptualization of Social Intelligence, which they defined initially as the ability to comprehend and manage people. Thorndike further described social intelligence as the ability to recognize one’s own and others’ internal states, motives, and behaviors, and to act toward them in the best possible manner based on that information. Because the authors hypothesized that social intelligence can be applied inward, social intelligence also includes the ability to understand and manage oneself. Gardner (1983) further conceptualized that EQ consists of adaptive skills, whereby an emotionally intelligent person has a deep awareness of his or her emotions and the ability to label and draw upon those emotions as a resource to guide behavior. A more recent conceptualization of Thorndike and Stein’s theory of social intelligence provided through the studies performed by Salovey and Mayer (1990) and Mayer and Salovey (1997) expressed EQ as the fundamental capacity to perceive emotions, assimilate emotion-related feelings, and understand the information of those emotions and manage them. To this point, research provided in the development and measurement of EQ had not been applied directly to leadership effectiveness and organizational performance, only that those individuals with high EQ were perceived and found to be able to manage the emotions of individuals and selves in a more constructive measure. Research in the conceptualization of EQ undertaken by Goleman (1995), defined five major components of EQ, which included: • • • • • Self-awareness – the ability to recognize and understand one’s moods, emotions, and drives, as well as one’s effect on others. Self-regulation – the ability to control or redirect disruptive impulses and moods. Motivation – a passion to work for reasons that go beyond money or status and a propensity to pursue goals with energy and persistence. Empathy – the ability to understand the emotional makeup of other people and skill in treating people according to emotional reactions. Social-skill – proficiency in managing relationships and building networks, as well as an ability to find common ground and build rapport. 39 AMBR Additional research by Goleman (1998) clarified that an individual with EQ would exhibit the following descriptive sub-constructs or “hallmarks” for each of the five components of EQ: • • • • • Self-awareness – self-confidence, realistic self-assessment, and a self-deprecating sense of humor. Self-regulation – trustworthiness and integrity, comfort with ambiguity, and openness to change. Motivation – strong drive for achievement, optimism – even in the face of failure, and organizational commitment. Empathy – expertise in building and retaining talent, cross-cultural sensitivity, and service to clients and customers. Social-skill – effectiveness in leading change, persuasiveness, and expertise in building and leading teams. In short, emotional intelligence means understanding your own and other people’s emotional makeup well enough to move people in the direction of accomplishing goals. Intelligence must meet several standard criteria before it can be considered scientifically legitimate. First, it should be capable of being operationalized as a set of abilities. Second, it should meet certain correlational criteria. The abilities defined by intelligence should be from a related set and be related to pre-existing intelligences, while also showing some unique variance. Third, the abilities of the intelligence should develop with age and experience (Mayer, Caruso, & Salovey, 2019). Mayer, Caruso, and Salovey (2019) argued that EQ does indeed describe actual abilities rather than preferred courses of behavior. To support EQ as an intelligence, two studies were performed to substantiate its psychometric claim. Study one (Mayer et al, 2019) included 503 adults with a mean of 23 years (range: 17 – 70). The participants were assessed using the Multifactor Emotional Intelligence Scale (MEIS), which consists of 12 tasks, divided into four classes or branches of abilities including perceiving, assimilating, understanding, and managing emotions. The results indicated that emotional intelligence shows a pattern that is consistent with a new domain of intelligence. The authors concluded that emotional intelligence can be operationalized as sets of abilities. The General Emotional Intelligence Factor can be divided into three subscales: Perception, Understanding, and Managing. Finally, EQ correlates moderately with a measure of verbal intelligence indicating that it is related but not the same. In their second study, Mayer et al (2019) dealt with establishing the third criterion of intelligence, in that intellectual capacities grow with age and experience from childhood to early adulthood. To determine if this actually occurred, 229 adolescents with a mean age of 13.4 (range 12 – 16), were administered several portions of the scale employed in the first study. For reasons of time and age appropriateness, only a subset of the scales administered to adults was administered to the adolescents. As predicted, the study showed that adults performed at higher ability levels than that of adolescents. In addition, emotional intelligence in adolescents revealed the same relationships as verbal intelligence and empathy in adults. Studies examining adolescents by Richardson (2017) and Richardson and Evans (2017) imply that the lack of emotional and social learning among adolescents may lead to future adult disciplinary and social problems. Specifically, Richardson (2017) stated that the lack of interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligences may cause individuals to become self-centered and unable to empathize and relate to others and may eventually lead to violent behavior. These intelligences must be nurtured and strengthened at an early age in children’s social environments. Richardson further stated that people who lack social and emotional competence frequently cause discipline problems and are unsuccessful in their academic pursuits. As a framework for teaching social and emotional intelligence, the author cited a successful program based on three main theories: (a) cognitive behavior, (b) transactional analysis, and (c) responsible assertion to enable greater empathy and social-awareness in building adolescents’ success for the future. 40 Further, Richardson and Evans (2017) examined a successful program in developing social and Mediating Effect of Emotional emotional competence, Connecting with Others, which was developed to assist students with disabilities Intelligence on to function in inclusive classrooms. The authors research found that the skills outlined in each lesson were applicable for all students. The program for elementary grades (K to 2 and 3 to 5) includes the the Relationship between following skill areas: concept of self and others, problem solving and conflict resolution, sharing, Transformational socialization, communication, and empathy and caring. Programs developed for middle school grades Leadership and (6 to 8) vary in the skill areas. Additionally, two new areas were added to the middle school program: Employees group dynamics and time management. The eight skill areas for this age group included: awareness of Performance in Lebanese self and others, communications, responsibility, self-advocacy and assertiveness, conflict resolution, Universities cooperation and collaboration, love and caring, and time management and organization. Three studies performed by Davies, Stankov, and Roberts (1998), explored whether EQ should be included within the traditional cognitive abilities by investigating the relationships among measures of emotional intelligence, traditional human cognitive abilities, and personality. The three studies included a total population of 530 participants. Study one (Davies, Stankov, & Roberts 1998) was designed to cover as broad a range of emotional intelligence measures as possible, and participants were required to rate the extent to which each emotion was present in each stimulus on a five-point rating scale. The results of this study point to limitations in the construct of EQ, particularly with respect to its measurement through self-report instruments. The authors concluded that the limitations imposed were based on self-reports that had not been scientifically validated. The majority of subjective measures did not appear to assess anything new; they tended to define factors that have been already well-established (and construct-valid) through personality inventories. Study two (Davies, Stankov, & Roberts, 1998) employed the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB). The authors stated that the use of a different set of cognitive ability measures in this design can establish a reasonably strong argument that based on the subjective measures (self-report instruments) used do not assess any new validated measures. As with the conclusions of study one, results of study two also suggested that the linkage between cognitive abilities and emotional intelligence was weak. Because of the largely negative findings with self-report measures, the primary purpose of study three (Davies, Stankov, & Roberts, 1998) was to assess whether the Emotional Perception Factor defined in study one represented anything other than a combination of existing measures produced by using a self-reported response. The conclusions by the authors for study three indicated that replication of an emotional perception factor, as identified in study one, could not be achieved. Therefore, their findings claim that EQ is either a personality trait or a type of ability. Concluding that if it is either a personality or type of ability, it cannot yet be measured in a dependable way. Stankov (2018) further argued why his research could not establish the existence of EQ for two reasons, both of which have to do with the measurement of the construct. First, questionnaire measures of EQ seem to be closely related to factors captured by existing personality questionnaires. Second, objective measures have employed consensual scoring procedures that seem to have poor reliability. Emotion perception may be the only aspect of emotional intelligence that has a chance of becoming an established trait in the future. From the above discussion, these hypotheses were developed: H2: There is significant relationship between emotional intelligent style and employees’ performance. H3: Emotional intelligent mediates the relationship between transformational leadership and employees’ performance 41 AMBR METHODS The study focused on describing employees of Lebanese Universities as the characteristics of the population. According to Sekaran and Bougie, (2010) descriptive design is undertaken in order to describe the features of the concerned variable in a given circumstance. The survey method was adopted to achieve the aim of the study, since the study focused on the employee’ performance of the employees. Furthermore, the survey research employed questionnaires to have responses from the respondents (Zikmund, 2003). The study used a self-report questionnaire method for all adapted items to measure independent variables (transformational leadership), mediating variable (emotional intelligent) and dependent variable (employee’ performance). The research adopted quantitative method as the aim is to determine the effect on each variable on another. It also allows results generalization to the entire population as a result of vast sample population (Malhotra, 2010; Gelo et al., 2008; McDanial & Gates, 2007). The population comprises of all employees in Lebanese universities. This study selected four top universities in Lebanon, with 6,012 total employees. Therefore, according to Kriejcie and Morgan sample determination table, for 6000 to 7000 population, the minimum of 374 samples were required. Nevertheless, the size of the sample was multiplied by two to minimize error in sampling and to take care of nonresponse rate issue (Hair, Wolfinbarger & Ortinall 2008). Hence, 400 was selected as the total number of questionnaires to administer. The 400 questionnaires with self-addressed envelopes were distributed through post-mail to the employees in selected four Lebanese universities. To increase and achieve high response rates, series of follow-up were made through emails, SMS, several phone call reminders and self-visit to the respondents (Silva, Smith, & Barnmer, 2002; Traina, MacLean, Park, & Kahn, 2005; Sekaran, 2003; Dillman, 2000; Porter, 2004; Dillman et al., 2009). As suggested by De Leeuw, (2005) and Dillman et al., (2009) on response rate improvement to post-mail mode, an email was sent to some respondents through their associations as an appreciation to those that send back the questionnaire and as another remainder to those that did not send back their responses. For those could not reach by email, a self-visit was conducted to their respective representative in order to persuade them to fill in the questionnaire in their regular monthly or emergency meetings. Although the sample of the study is 374 as suggested by Krejcie and Morgan (1970) the increase of the 400 sent out questionnaires was deliberately done to overcome the likelihood of not getting the required number of sample size because of the tendency of non-responses (Bartlett, Kotrlik, & Higgins, 2001; Cochran, 1977). Thus, because of the efforts made, 330 questionnaires were returned out of 400 questionnaires that were distributed by postal delivery to the targeted respondents. After the collection of sufficient data that matches the minimum sample size requirements, researcher coded, summarized and analysed the data with SPSS, structural equation modelling (PLS). Both descriptive and inferential statistics were employed as a method of data analysis. Descriptive statistics was employed to explain the features of data quantitatively. It aims to summarize a sample rather than taking the whole population (Bichi, 2004). It gives a summary about the sample and the observation made. Therefore, PLS-SEM was employed in the data analysis. Below are details explanations on the instruments employed in analysing and interpreting the data collected for the main explanatory study. The PLS modelling is considered as the most appropriate method of data analysis in this study based on several reasons. PLS path modelling is selected in this study because of the estimation the interactions between constructs or structural model and associations between indicators and their corresponding latent constructs or measurement model concurrently, even though it is similar to conventional regression technique (Chin, Marcolin, & Newsted, 2003; Duarte & Raposo, 2010; Gerlach, Kowalslu, & Wold, 1979; Lohmoeller, 1989. Additionally, the objective of the study is to predict the role of organizational factors in increasing academicians’ commitment. In addition, the study has reflective constructs. Lastly, compared to other path modelling software, Smart PLS software was carefully chosen as a tool of data analysis for the reason that of its friendly graphical user interface that help users to create a moderating and mediating effect for path models with interaction effects (Temme, Kreis, & Hildebrandt, 2006, 2010). 42 RESULT AND DISCUSSION Overall, a total of 400 sets of questionnaires were distributed to the targeted participants. Out of 400 distributed questionnaires, 330 were returned making the response rate of 82.5 percent. 13 of the 330 questionnaires were eliminated during data cleaning process and the remaining 317 sets of questionnaires were usable for further analysis. Data was screened and cleaned to ensure the accuracy of the data collected. This was done by analysing the original data collected against the source data file. Following Tabachnick and Fidell (2001), data cleaning in this study involved checking the accuracy of the data input, dealing with missing values, detecting and treating the outliers. Table 1 summarised the demographic background of the respondents. As indicated in Table 1, 45.7 percent (N=145) of the respondents were male compared to female employees of 54.3 percent (N=172). The respondents were less than 30 years old (10.7%), 31 to 40 (40.4%), 41 to 50 (24.3%) and over 50 (24.6%). Most of Bachelor Degree (32.5%) and Master Degree (30.3%) holders. Majority of the respondents had the working experience between 7 to 10 years (45.9% and more than 10 years (26.5%). Gender Male Female Age (Years) Less than 30 30 to 40 41 to 50 >50 Education Certificate Diploma Bachelor Degree Masters/PhD Others Working Experience (Years) Less than 3 3 to 6 7 to 10 More than 10 Frequency Percentage 145 172 45.7 54.3 34 128 77 78 10.7 40.4 24.3 24.6 14 53 103 96 51 4.4 16.7 32.5 30.3 16.1 29 68 136 84 9.1 21.5 42.9 26.5 Mediating Effect of Emotional Intelligence on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Employees Performance in Lebanese Universities Table 1. Demographic Background of Respondents (N = 317) Assessment of a Measurement Model To assess the measurement model, the following activities were undertaken in this study: examining internal consistency reliability, ascertaining indicator reliability and determining convergent and discriminant validity (Hair et al., 2014). These activities were undertaken in order to identify the relationship between the observed variables and the underlying latent constructs (Hamid, Ishak & Yusof, 2015). The first stage hierarchical construct model was first assessed as seen in Tables 2, Table 3 and Figure 1 and 2. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and composite reliability coefficient were used to measure the internal consistency reliability for this study. Using composite reliability coefficient to interpret internal consistency reliability is based on the rule of thumb that composite reliability coefficient should be at least 0.70 (Hair et al., 2010). Thus, as can be seen in Table 2, the Cronbach’s Alpha values are between 0.874 and 0.953, while values of composite reliability are between 0.905 and 0.958. Thus, internal consistency reliability is not an issue for this study. 43 AMBR Figure 1. Algorithm of First-Stage Hierarchical Construct Model The indicator reliability was assessed by examining the outer loadings of each constructs’ measure (Hair et al., 2012). To ensure unidimensionality of a measurement model, items should be 0.50 or higher (Afthanorhan, 2013). Since most of the items in Figure 1 have relatively good loadings, 0.60 was taken as the minimum for the first stage model of this study; hence, all items shows good loadings greater than 0.60 and were retained in the model. Convergent validity is the extent to which items truly represent the intended latent construct and correlate with other measures of the same latent construct (Hair et al., 2006). The convergent validity of this study was examined by the AVE of each latent construct, as suggested as suggested by Fornell and Larcker (1981). The AVE of each latent construct should be at least 0.50 (Chin, 1998). The AVEs for this study as shown in Table 2 are all above 0.50, suggesting adequate convergent validity. Table 2. Loadings, Average Variance Extracted (AVE) and Reliabilities for First Stage Hierarchical Construct Model 44 Latent Construct & Indicators Standardised Loading Performance EP1 EP10 EP11 EP12 EP13 EP14 EP15 EP16 EP17 EP18 EP2 EP3 EP4 EP5 EP6 EP7 EP8 EP9 0.704 0.694 0.750 0.782 0.778 0.790 0.735 0.714 0.657 0.820 0.650 0.749 0.740 0.817 0.803 0.816 0.728 0.689 Composite Reliability Cronbach’s Alpha 0.958 0.953 Average Variance Extracted (AVE) 0.558 Transformational trans1 trans10 trans11 trans12 trans2 trans3 trans4 trans5 trans6 trans7 trans8 trans9 trans1 Emotional Intelligent EMP1 EMP2 EMP3 EMP4 EMP5 MOTIV1 MOTIV2 MOTIV3 MOTIV4 MOTIV5 SA1 SA2 SA3 SA4 SA5 SR1 SR2 SR3 SR4 SR5 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 0.905 0.874 0.613 0.964 0.960 0.508 0.846 0.747 0.815 0.685 0.631 0.660 0.682 0.653 0.732 0.740 0.824 0.793 0.846 Mediating Effect of Emotional Intelligence on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Employees Performance in Lebanese Universities 0.73 0.72 0.732 0.749 0.761 0.544 0.7 0.735 0.657 0.758 0.822 0.817 0.805 0.716 0.779 0.571 0.808 0.662 0.76 0.614 0.745 0.706 0.735 0.527 0.721 0.521 Similar to convergent validity, AVE was also used to determine the discriminant validity of this study (Fornell & Larcker, 1981). Accordingly, based on Fornell and Larcker’s (1981) suggestion, discriminant validity was evaluated with the use of the AVE with a score of 0.50 or more. Also the square root of the AVE should be greater. Thus, as seen in Table 2, the values of AVE for this study are between 0.543 and 0.613, indicating acceptable values. In Table 3, the correlations among the latent constructs are compared with the square root of AVE (in bold face). The AVEs are all greater than the correlations among latent constructs, indicating sufficient discriminant validity (Fornell & Larcker, 1981). 45 AMBR Table 3. Latent Variable Correlation and Square Roots of Average Variance Extracted Emotional Performance Transformational Emotional 0.713 0.664 0.33 Performance Transformational 0.749 0.408 0.737 Assessment of Significance of the Structural Model The current study assessed the structural model. This study also applied bootstrapping method with 5000 bootstrap samples to assess the significance of the path coefficients (Hair et al., 2014; Hair et al., 2012; Hair et al., 2011; Henseler et al., 2009). Figure 2 and Table 4 therefore show the estimates for the full structural model. Figure 2. PLS Structural Model Assessment of Variance Explained in the Endogenous Latent Variables As presented in the above Table 4, the research model explains 48.1 percent of the total variance in employee performance. This advocates that the sets of exogenous latent variables (i.e., transformational leadership styles and emotional intelligent) collectively explain 48.1 percent of the variance of the employee performance. Therefore, resulting from Falk and Miller's (1992) and Chin's (1998) the criteria, the endogenous latent variables showed acceptable levels of R-squared values, which were considered as substantial respectively. Table 4. Variance Explained in the Endogenous Latent Variables Latent Variables Employee Performance Emotional intelligent Variance Explained (R2) 0.389 0.109 Adjusted R2 0.385 0.106 Hypotheses Testing At the beginning, Hypothesis 1 to Hypothesis 2 predicted that leadership styles and emotional intelligent are positively related to employee performance. Result in Table 5 and Figure 2 revealed a significant positive relationship between transformational leadership and employee performance (B = 0.212, t = 4.302, p< 0.01), supporting Hypothesis H1. Similarly, Hypothesis 2 anticipated that emotional intelligent is positively associated to employee performance. As shown in Table 5 and Figure 2, result also showed the significant association between emotional intelligent and employee performance (B=0.594, t = 15.000, p > 0.01). These findings have successfully support H1 and H2. 46 Hypothesis H1 H2 Relationship Emotional -> Performance Transformational -> Performance Beta 0.212 0.594 T 4.302 15.000 Sig. 0.000 0.000 Summary Supported Supported Mediation Effect of Emotional Intelligent H3 posits the mediating effect of emotional intelligent on the relationship between transformational leadership style and employees’ performance. According to Hair et al. (2018), “mediation occurs when a third mediator variable intervenes between two other related constructs” (p. 228). Precisely, a variation in the exogenous constructs reasons a variation in the mediator construct, which in turn, results in a variation in the endogenous construct in the PLS path model, referred as mediation effect. The current study used SmartPLS 3.2.6 (Ringle et al., 2015) to assess the structural model together with the mediator variable via bootstrapping method which can be considered as slightly rigorous for assessing the mediation effects (Hair et al., 2013). As showed in Figure 4.4, the mediating hypotheses were also tested, as per the guidelines of Hair et al. (2018). Figure 3 showed that transformational leadership significantly predicted EI (B = 0.330, p<0.01), fulfilling path ‘a’ (IV to MV). Transformational leadership also displayed a significant relationship with employees performance (B = 0.212, p<0.01) in path ‘c’. However, the present of EI in the model has decrease the relationship between Transformational leadership to EP (B = 0.196, p<0.01). Hence, it can be concluded that EI has partially mediates the relationship between Transformational leadership and EP, supporting H3. EI 0.330** Transformat ional leadership 0.212** / 0.196** Mediating Effect of Emotional Intelligence on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Employees Performance in Lebanese Universities Table 5. Structural Model Assessment Figure 3. Mediating effect of EI in the relationship between Transformational leadership and EP 0.594** EP CONCLUSION The finding revealed that Transformational leadership styles significantly influence the employee’s performance in Lebanese universities, parallel with the previous results (Peter (2018; Nadarasa, 2017; Shen et al. 2018; Zhou 2019). The two-leadership style studied were found to have significant influence on the employees’ performance. Similarly, Judge and Piccolo (2019) found a significant relationship between this leadership style and the level of employees’ performance and attitude toward the workplace. In other studies, the transformational leadershipstyle has been regarded as having a positive impact on different aspects of employees’ performance and satisfaction levels. The same notion applies for transactional leadership, andso did laissez-faire leadership (David, 2017). Transformational work in coordination in order to bring out motivated employees in the workplace. This notion goes hand-in-hand with Bass’ theory (Yukl, 2017) which considers the transformational leadership styles as the best approachwhich can arouse or encourage employees to be prosperous and thriving at work. In the same light, David (2017) states that there are some important factors which affect the performance of employees at work, and motivation is a rudimentary factor. When employees have high motivation levels at work, the transformational leadership styles, if implemented, would affecttheir performance by epitomizing it (David, 2017). 47 AMBR The positive effect of this kind of styles on employees’ performance takes place when the latter assess this style from a positive point of view, and can have negative implications when employees have tendencies to be dishonest, distrustful, and disloyal (Haryadi, 2003). Furthermore, Andarika (2004) and Ahn et al. (2005)confirm that transformational leadership styles have significant impacts on the performance of employees and more positively. Through this, the subordinate groups will reciprocate by showing maximum work efforts. Emotional intelligence mediates the influence of transformational on employees’ performance. In a sense, the indicators of transformational can improve employees’ performance due to the presence of emotional intelligence. The direct effect of transformational on performance was 25.8 percent while the indirect effect of transformational on employees’ performance through emotional intelligence was 0.7 percent. This means that the indirect effect of transformational is greater than the direct effect on employees’ performance. In other words, emotional intelligence can mediate the effect of transformational leadership on employees’ performance. This finding is consistent with Agustian (2021) who affirms that professional world possesses various issues and challenges every employee has to handle. Professional world requires not only intellectual competence, but also emotional competence or intelligence, which has appeared more crucial. If one can solve his emotional problems, his work result will increase. The outcomes of this study offered substantial empirical support to the research framework from a theoretical perspective. Through this study, the relationship between the leadership styles, emotional intelligence and employees’ performance was established. The findings of this study support the work by Agustian (2021) who reported that leadership styles and emotional intelligence have the significant effect on employees’ performance. In addition, this study discovered that emotional intelligence had a mediating impact on the relationship between leadership styles and employee’s performance. Al Khajeh (2018) found that previous studies on leadership styles tended to focus on three domains of leadership styles. However, this study focused on five domains of leadership styles including democratic, autocratic, laissez-faire, transactional and transformational leadership styles. The findings validated the theoretical underpinning of employee’s performance and the idea of employee’s performance in in organization was impacted by leadership styles and emotional intelligence (Narsir et al. (2020). The findings partially supported the hypothesis because of many distinct elements compared to previous research, such as the kind of population, decision-making process, a mix of respondents and factors, or perception of risk in a variety of settings (situational factors). Another contribution of this study was to explore leadership styles from a domestic viewpoint, which differed from previous studies that primarily involved employees in general and public organization before the pandemic and lockdown. This study's findings were based on the general participants, who included support staffs, managerial level employee, academics, and others. This study also offers an opportunity to conduct future research on employees’ performance from various dimensions (particular group of respondents) situations for comparison. This study focused on the universities’ employees, which means that researchers may not be able to directly compare the findings if studies were conducted on different individuals and conditions. References Adair, J. (2003). Not Bosses but Leaders: How to Lead the Way to Success (3rd ed.).London: Kogan Page. Afthanorhan, W. M. A. B. W., & Ahmad, S. (2013). Modelling the Multimediator on Motivation among Youth In Higher Education Institution Towards Volunteerism Program. Mathematical Theory and Modeling, 3(7), 64-70. Al Khajeh, E. H. (2018). Impact of leadership styles on organizational performance. Journalof Human Resources Management Research, 2018(2018), 1-10. Aldoory, L., & Toth, E. (2004). Leadership and gender in public relations: Perceived effectiveness of transformational and transactional leadership styles. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(2), 157–183. 48 Armstrong, M. (2012). Armstrong’s Handbook of Management and Leadership: DevelopingEffective People Skills for Better Leadership and Management (3rd ed.). London: Kogan Page. Avolio, B. J. & Bass, B. M. (2009). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Manual andsampler set. (3rd Ed.) Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. Aydin, A., Sarier, Y., & Uysal, S. (2013). The effect of school principals’ leadership styles on teachers’ organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Educational Sciences: Theoryand Practice, 13(2), 806-811. Bakker A.B., Demerouti E. (2008). Towards a model of emotional intelligence. Career Dev. Int.;13(3):209–223. Mediating Effect of Emotional Intelligence on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Employees Performance in Lebanese Universities Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Research. Published in Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43-50. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire sampleset: Technical report, leaders form, rater form, and scoring key for MLQ Form 5x-Short(2nd Ed.). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. Batista-Taran L.C., Shuck M.B., Gutierrez C.C., Baralt S. (2009). The role of leadership style in employee engagement. In: Plakhotnik M.S., Nielsen S.M., Pane D.M.,editors. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual College of Education & GSN ResearchConference. Florida International University; Miami: pp. 15– 20.http://coeweb.fiu.edu/research_conference/ Becker, W., Dale, W., Pakur, E. and Grove, J. (2010). Forensic Science in Transition: Critical Leadership Challenges. United States of America: Taylor and Francis. Bichi, M.Y (2004). Introduction to research method and statistics. Kano: Debis-co press and Publishing Company. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership, New York. Harper & Row, Onursal Arkan. Carasco-Saul M., Kim W., Kim T. (2015). Leadership and employee engagement proposingresearch agendas through a review of literature. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 14(1):38–63. Chan, S. C., & Mak, W. M. (2014). Transformational leadership, pride in being a follower of the leader and organizational commitment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Chin, W. W. (1998a). Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16. Cochran, W.G. (1977). Sampling technique (3rd edition). John Wiley and Sons. New York Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley. Dillman, D. A., Phelps, G., Tortora, R., Swift, K., Kohrell, J., Berck, J., & Messer, B. L. (2009). Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet. Social Science Research, 38(1), 1 - 18. Duarte, P. A. O., & Raposo, M. L. B. (2010). A PLS model to study brand preference: An application to the mobile phone market. In Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications, 449-485. Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A Primer for Soft Modeling. University of Akron Press. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. 49 AMBR Forsyth, D. R. (2017). Group dynamics (2nd Ed.). California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the debate. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42(3), 266-290. Gerlach, R. W., Kowalski, B. R., & Wold, H. 0. (1979). Partial least squares path modelling with latent variables (No. 15). Washington Univ Seattle Lab For Chemometrics. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bloomsbury. Goleman, D. (2018). What makes a leader? Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 93–103. Goleman, D. (2018). What makes a leader? Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 93–103. Goleman, D., & Boyatzis, R. (2019). Emotional competence inventory 360 (ECI): Technical manual. Retrieved May 10, 2004 from http://www.eiconsortium.org/measures/eci_360.htm Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. E., & McKee, A. (2019). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business School. Groves, K. S. (2014). Examining leader-follower congruence of social responsibility values in transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21, 227- 243. Hair, Hult, G., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Long Range Planning 46 (1st Edtn) Singapore: Sage. Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate DataAnalysis. A global perspective (Vol. 7). Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M and Ringle, C. M., (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM, European Business Review Vol. 31 No. 1, 2019 pp. 2-24 © Emerald Publishing Limited 0955-534X DOI 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203. Haque, A., Faizan, R., & Cockrill, A. (2017). The Relationship between Female Representation at Strategic Level and Firm’s Competitiveness: Evidences from Cargo Logistic Firms of Pakistan and Canada. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 15, 69-81. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2017.15.2.07. Hays, R. D., Morales, L. S., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Medical Care, 38, II28–II42. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-319. Igbaekemen, G. O., & Odivwri, J. E. (2015). Impact of Leadership Style on Organization Performance: A Critical Literature Review. Arabian Journal of Business and ManagementReview, 5, 1-7. Jin, Y. (2010). Emotional leadership as a key dimension of public relations leadership: National survey of public relations leaders. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(2),159-181. Jyoti, J., & Bhau, S. (2015). Impact of transformational leadership on job performance: Mediating role of leader-member exchange and relational identification. SAGE Open, 1-13. Khan M.J., Aslam N., Riaz M.N. (2012). Leadership styles as predictors of innovative work behavior. Pak. J. Clin. Psychol. 9(2):17–22. 50 Mediating Effect Khan, A., & Adnan, N. (2014). Impact of leadership styles on organizational performance. of Emotional International Journal of Management Sciences, 2(11), 501-515. Intelligence on Khan, S., Asghar, M., & Zaheer, A. (2014). Influence of Leadership Style on Employee Job the Relationship Satisfaction and Firm Financial Performance: A Study of Banking Sector in Islamabad between Pakistan. Actual Problems in Economics, 155, 374-384. Transformational Khan, Z. A., Khan, A.N., & Khan, I.D. (2016). Leadership theories and styles: A literature review. Leadership and Journal of Resources Development and Management, 16(1), 1-7. Employees Kim W. The Pennsylvania State University; 2014. An Examination of Emotional intelligence in Selected Major Organizations in Korea: its Role as a Mediator between Antecedents and Consequences. Dissertation. Klein, A. S., Cooke, R. A., & Wallis, J. (2013). The Impact of Leadership Styles onOrganizational Culture and Firm Effectiveness: An Empirical Study. Journal of Management & Organization, 19, 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2013.34 Performance in Lebanese Universities Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psycho1 Meas, 30(3), 607- 10. Longe, O. J. (2014). Leadership style paradigm shift and organizational performance: Acase of the Nigerian Cement Industry. African Research Review, 8(4), 68-83. Luthan, F. (2011). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill Press. Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing research: An applied orientation, 5th ed. Pearson Education India. Malhotra. Mathew, M., & Gupta, K. S. (2015). Transformational leadership: Emotional intelligence. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 12(2), 75-89. McDaniel, M. A., Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2007). Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 14(2), 200-206. McKee, A. (2014). Management: a focus on leaders. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc. Mohammad, I., Chowdhury, S. R., & Sanju, N. L. (2017). Leadership styles followed in the banking industry of Bangladesh: A case study of some selected banks and financial institutions. American J. of Theoretical and Applied Business, 3(3), 36-49. Mullins L. (2004). Management and organizational behavior, Pearson Higher Education FT Prentice Hall. Mullins L. J., (2000). Management and Organizational Behavior, Pitman Publishers, London Mullins, L. J. (2000). Management and Organisational Behavior. London: PitmanPublishers. Park Y.K., Song J.H., Yoon S.W., Kim J. (2013). Learning organization and innovativebehavior: the mediating effect of emotional intelligence. Eur. J. Train Puni, A., Mohammed, I., & Asamoah, E. (2018). Transformational leadership and job satisfaction: The moderating effect of contingent reward. Leadership & OrganisationDevelopment Journal, 39(4), 522-537. Puni, A., Ofei, S. B., & Okoe, A. (2014). The Effect of Leadership Styles on FirmPerformance in Ghana. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6, 177-185 Saks A.M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. J. Manag. Psychol.21(7):600–619. 51 AMBR Salanova M., Lorente L., Chambel M.T., Martinez I.M. (2011). Linking transformational leadership to nurses’ extra-role performance: the mediating role of self-efficacy and emotional intelligence. J. Adv. Nurs. ;67(10):2256–2266 Salanova M., Schaufeli W.B. (2008). A cross-national study of emotional intelligence as amediator between job resources and proactive behavior. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 19(1):116–131. Schaufeli W.B., Bakker A.B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J. Organ. Behav. 25(3):293–315. Schaufeli W.B., Bakker A.B. (2010). Defining and measuring emotional intelligence: bringing clarity to the concept. In: Bakker A.B., Leiter M.P., editors. Emotional intelligence: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. Psychology Press; New York, NY: pp. 10–24. Sekaran, U & Bougie, R. J. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons. Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5thed.). John Willey & Sons Ltd. Sekaran, U. (2000). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons,Inc. Silva, M. S., Smith, W. T., & Bammer, G. (2002). Telephone reminders are a cost effective way to improve responses in postal health surveys. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 56(2), 115- 118. Sofi, M.A., & Devanadhen, D.K. (2015). Impact of leadership styles on organizational performance: An empirical assessment of the banking sector in Jammu and Kashmir. IOSRJournal of Business and Management, 17(8), 31-45. Song J.,H., Kolb J.A., Lee U.H., Kim H.K. (2012). Role of transformational leadership in effective organizational knowledge creation practices: mediating effects of employees’ emotional intelligence. Human Dev. Q. 23(1):65–101. Sun, W., Xu, A., & Shang, Y. (2014). Transformational leadership, team climate, and team performance within the NPD team: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31, 127-147. Tabachnich, B. G., & Fidel, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate statistics (5th Ed), Boston: Pearson Education Limited. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Temme, D., Kreis, H., & Hildebrandt, L. (2006). PLS path modeling: A software reviewwo. 2006, 084). SFB discussion paper. Traina, S. B., MacLean, C. H., Park, G. S., & Kahn, K. L. (2005). Telephone reminder calls increased response rates to mailed study consent forms. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 58(7), 743-746. Wang, F.-J., Shieh, C., & Tang, M. (2010). Effect of Leadership Style on Organizational Performance as Viewed from Human Resources Management Strategy. African Journal of Business Management, 14, 3924-3936. Xanthopoulou D., Bakker A.B., Demerouti E., Schaufeli W.B. (2009). Emotional intelligence and financial returns: a diary study on the role of job and personal resources. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol.;82(1):183–200. Xenikou, A. (2017). Transformational Leadership, Transactional Contingent Reward, and Organizational Identification: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Innovation and Goal Culture Orientations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1754. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01754. 52 Mediating Effect of Emotional Zikmund W., G. (2003). Business research methods. Mason: Thomson South-Western. Intelligence on the Relationship Zwingmann, I., Wegge, J., Wolf, S., Rudolf, M., Schmidt, M., & Richter, P. (2014). Is transformational between leadership healthy for employees? A multilevel analysis in 16 nations. German Journal of Transformational Leadership and Research in Human Resource Management, 28(1-2), 24. Employees Performance in Lebanese Universities Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in Organizations (6th Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson- Prentice. 53